Keywords
pendekatan problem posing, problem-based learning, prestasi belajar, motivasi belajar mahasiswa
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan pengaruh pendekatan problem posing dan pendekatan problem-based learning; dan untuk mengetahui mana yang lebih baik antara pendekatan problem posing dan pendekatan problem-based learning ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, dan motivasi belajar mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin Baubau. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison-group design. Populasi penelitian mencakup seluruh mahasiswa pendidikan matematika Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin Baubau yang mengambil mata kuliah Kalkulus II. Instrumen penelitian meliputi tes prestasi belajar, dan angket motivasi. Analisis yang digunakan, yaitu uji one sample t-test, T2 Hotteling's, dan uji independent sample t-test dengan data gain ternormalisasi. Setiap analisis dilakukan pada taraf signifikansi 5%. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) pendekatan problem posing dan pendekatan PBL berpengaruh positif terhadap prestasi belajar mahasiswa; (2) pendekatan problem posing tidak berpengaruh terhadap motivasi belajar mahasiswa sedangkan pendekatan PBL berpengaruh terhadap motivasi belajar mahasiswa; (3) pendekatan problem posing sama baiknya dengan pendekatan PBL ditinjau dari prestasi belajar mahasiswa; dan (4) pendekatan PBL lebih baik dibandingkan dengan pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari motivasi belajar mahasiswa.
Kata Kunci: pendekatan problem posing, problem-based learning, prestasi belajar, motivasi belajar mahasiswa.
The Effect Problem Posing and PBL on Learning Achievement, and Learning Motivation Students Mathematics Education
Abstract
This study aims is to describe the effect of problem posing and problem-based learning; and to knowing the better approach between problem posing approach and problem-based learning approach viewed from the learning achievement, and learning motivation of the students of mathematics Education Department of Dayanu Ikhsanuddin University of Baubau. This research was a quasi-experimental study with the pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison-group design. The population included all students of Mathematics Education Department who took Calculus II. The instrument used including an achievement test, and motivation questionnaire. The test was analyzed by One sample t-test, T2 Hottelling's and independent sample t-test with gain data normalized each analysis was performed at the significance level of 0.05.The research found: (1) the problem posing approach and PBL approach positive effect the learning achievement; (2) PBL approach affect student's learning motivation while the problem posing does not; (3) the problem posing approach is equal good to PBL approach in achieving the learning objective; and (4) the problem-based learning approach is better than the problem posing approach viewed from student's learning motivation. Keywords: problem posing approach, problem-based learning, learning objective achievement, student's learning motivation.
Page Range
100-108
Issue
1
Volume
3
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jrpm.v3i1.7303
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/7303
Recommended Citation
Amiluddin, R., & Sugiman, S. (2016). Pengaruh problem posing dan PBL terhadap prestasi belajar, dan motivasi belajar mahasiswa pendidikan matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 100-108. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i1.7303
References
Akay, H. (2010). The effect of problem posing oriented analyses-ii course on the attitudes toward mathematics and mathematics self-efficacy of elementary prospective mathematics teachers: Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 57-75. Sutcu Imam University.
Antara News. (2012). IPM Sultra berada urutan 25 di Indonesia. http:m.antarasultra.com/berita/263308/ipm-berada-urutan-25-di-indonesia. Di akses pada tanggal 5 November pukul 19.00.
Arends, R.I. (2013). Belajar untuk mengajar. Learning to teach. Edisi 9. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Bao, L. (2006). Theoretical comparison of average normalized gain calculations. Physics Education Research.
Bell, G. M. E. (1978) Learning and instruction. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2015). Indeks pengembangan manusia tingkatan provinsi. Jakarta: BPS
Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn (2rd Ed). New Jersey: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
Brown, S.I., & Walter, M.I. (1990). The art of problem posing (2nd Ed). New Jersey: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
Cahyo, A.N. (2013). Panduan aplikasi teori-teori belajar mengajar teraktual dan terpopuler.Yogyakarta: DIVA Press.
Dehyadegary, E., et al. (2012). Academic engagement as a mediator in relationship between emotional intelligence and academic achievement among adolescents in kerman-iran [Versi elektronik]. Journal of American Science, 8,9, 823-832.
Djidu, H. (2014). DPNA mata kuliah Kalkulus II program studi pendidikan matematika. Baubau: Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin.
Duch, B.J, Allen D.E., & White, H.B. (2000). Problem based learning: Preparing students to succeed in the 21st century. University of Delaware.
Farhan, M., & Retnawati, H. (2014). Keefektifan PBL dan IBL ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan representasi matematis, dan motivasi belajar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 227-240. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2678
Gable, R.K. (1986). Instrument development in the affective domain. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Glass, G.V., & Hopkins, K.D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and physchology (2rd Ed). New Jersey. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood.
Haji, S. (2011). Pendekatan problem posing dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal kependidikan triandik.
Hake, R.R. (1999) Analyzing change/gain scores. American educational research assosiation's division d, measurement and research methodology.[http://lists.asu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9903 &L=aera-d&P=R6855].
Hake, R.R. Inretactive-engagment vs traditional method: a six-thousand-student survey of mecanics test data for introductory physics courses. American journal of physics.[hake@ix.netcom.com].
Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative and mixed approach (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publiction, Inc.
Levin, B.B. (2001). Energizing teacher education and professionl development with problem-based learning. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes.Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendekia Press.
Mars, C. (2010). Becoming a teacher: knowledge, skill, & issue. (5rd ed). Sydney: Pearson Educational International.
Muslimin, Z.I. (2012). Prestasi belajar mahasiswa ditinjau dari jalur penerimaan mahasiswa baru, asal sekolah, dan skor tes potensi akademik. Jurnal penelitian psikologi, 3, 1, 381-393.
Ormrod, J.E. (2009). Psikologi pendidikan membantu siswa tumbuh dan berkembang edisi keenam jilid 2. (diterjemahkan oleh Amitya Kumara). Upper Saddle River, Nj: Merril Prentice Hall.
Popham, W.J. (1999). Clasroom asessment: What teacher need to know. Los Angeles: Allyn-Bacon.
Prastiti, S.D., & Pujiningsih, S. (2009). Pengaruh faktor preferensi gaya belajar terhadap prestasi belajar mahasiswa akutansi. Jurnal ekonomi bisnis, 14, 3, 224-231.
Schunk, D.H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perpective (6rd Ed). Boston: Pearson Educational, Inc.
Schunk, D.H, Printrinch, P. R, dan Meece, J. L. (2012). Motivasi dalam pendidikan: Teori, penelitian, dan aplikasi. Jakarta: Indeks. (diterjemahkan oleh Ellys Tjo dari Motivation in education, theory, research, and application (3rd ed). Trenton, New Jersey: Pearson Educational International.
Silver, E.A. (1996). An analysis of arithmeticproblem posing by middle school students. Journal for research in mathematics education 1996,vol.27, no 5. 521-539. University of Pittsburgh.
Silver, E.A. (1996). Posing mathematical problems: An exploratory study. Journal for research in mathematics education 1996. Vol 27, No 3. 293-309. University of Pittsburgh.
Skemp, R.R. (1971). The psycology of learning mathematics. Victoria, Australia: Penguin books Australia ltd.
Slavin, R.E. (2006). Educational psychology theory and practice (8rd Ed). Boston: Pearson Educational, Inc.
Slavin, R.E. (2011). Psikologi pendidikan. (jilid 2) Jakarta: Indeks. (diterjemahkan oleh Matianto Samosir dari Educational psycology) (9rd ed).Boston, Massachusetts: Pearson Educational, Inc.
SNDIKTI. (2014). Kepmendiknas no 49 tahun 2014 tentang kerangka kualifikasi nasional Indonesia (KKNI).
Stevens, J. P (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social science, New York: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Widjajanti, D.B. (2009). Mengembangkan keyakinan (belief) siswa terhadap matematika melalui pbl. Makalah disajikan dalam seminar, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
