Keywords
Citizenship Education, Smart Mobile Civic, Tollerance
Document Type
Article
Abstract
The formation of student characters is carried out with variations in the form of digital-based "Smart Mobile Civic" learning media innovations that can be applied to learning civic education. It is hoped that this innovation has the potential to improve critical, rational, and creative thinking skills following Pancasila's values in responding to various problems in the field of citizenship. This research aims to (1) analyse the implementation and improvement of tolerance character. (2) analysis of the effectiveness of the tolerant values applied in Smart Mobile Civic. The research results show that: (1) Lecturers act as presenters and models for students to develop good values. (2) Smart Mobile Civic is an effective medium for efforts to form an attitude of tolerance shown through the learning achievements of citizens' rights and obligations in maintaining the integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. The diversity of Indonesian society as a Unitary State is integrated with the Teaching Module developed with the Smart Mobile Civic application. It is very relevant to the demands of digitalisation of citizenship education learning technology as a form of increasing "civic disposition" competence, which develops attitudes as a form of implementing citizenship education and achieving the Pancasila student profile, namely having six main characteristics: faith, devotion to God Almighty, and noble character, global diversity, cooperation, independence, critical thinking and creativity.
First Page
1
Last Page
10
Page Range
1 - 10
Issue
1
Volume
22
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jc.v22i1.1280
Recommended Citation
Trisiana, A., Triyanto, T., Zakaria, G., Sakinah, S., & Arvinth, N. (2025). Promoting diversity tolerance among Indonesians through smart mobile civic media in Citizenship Education. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 22(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v22i1.1280
References
Abdullah, N. N., & Sahar, R. (2020). Exploring intercultural interaction: The use of semiotic resources in meaning-making processes. GLOCAL Conference Proceedings, 2020-Janua, 332–336.
Andrews, L., Higgins, A., Andrews, M. W., & Lalor, J. G. (2012). Classic grounded theory to analyse secondary data: Reality and reflections. Grounded Theory Review, 11(1). https://groundedtheoryreview.com/2012/06/01/classic-grounded-theory-to-analyse-secondary-data-reality-and-reflections/
Arant, R., Larsen, M., & Boehnke, K. (2021). Acceptance of diversity as a building block of social cohesion: Individual and structural determinants. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.612224
Arsyad, A. (2006). Media pembelajaran. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Arsyad, A. (2013). Media pembelajaran edisi revisi. Rajawali Pers.
Bakar, A. (2015). Konsep toleransi dan kebebasan beragama. Toleransi: Media Ilmiah Komunikasi Umat Beragama, 7(2), 123–131. https://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/toleransi/article/view/1426
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Croucher, S. M. (2017). Why intercultural communication? In Global perspectives on intercultural communication (pp. 3–13). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716282-2
de Araujo Gil, L., Leckie, C., & Johnson, L. (2016). The impact of self on materialism among teenagers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(3), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1573
Del Águila, R. (2005). Tolerance. European Political Science, 4(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210040
Dima, B., & Dima, Ş. M. (2016). Income distribution and social tolerance. Social Indicators Research, 128(1), 439–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1038-y
Divo, M., Gartner, E., & Scinto, S. (2008). Communication alternatives. In Ventilatory support for chronic respiratory failure (pp. 361–370). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.3109/9781420020229-32
Durvasula, S., & Lysonski, S. (2010). Money, money, money - how do attitudes toward money impact vanity and materialism? - The case of young Chinese consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011027268
Erawati, D. (2017). Interpretasi multikulturalisme agama dan pendidikan. Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Masyarakat, 13(1), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.23971/jsam.v13i1.594
Fletcher, M. (2016). Writing an e-communications strategy. In e-Communication Skills: A guide for primary care. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315378404-19
Guo, Q. (2019). Competency in globalization and intercultural communication. In The Wiley Handbook of Global Workplace Learning. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119227793.ch16
Harell, A., & Stolle, D. (2010). Diversity and democratic politics: An introduction. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000842391000003X
Huat See, B. (2018). Understanding the moral values of young people and the key influences on their character development. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.31532/InterdiscipEducPsychol.2.2.001
Jain, D., & Patodia, P. (2022). Degradation of moral values in young generation: A study of Shekhawati region of Rajasthan. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2022.v04i05.926
Jay, S., Batruch, A., Jetten, J., McGarty, C., & Muldoon, O. T. (2019). Economic inequality and the rise of far-right populism: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2409
Liu, Z., Zhang, H., Wei, L., & Ge, X. (2022). Moral chameleons: The positive association between materialism and self-interest-triggered moral flexibility. Journal of Research in Personality, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104268
Mawadda, M., Supriadi, U., Anwar, S., & Abbas, H. M. (2023). Tolerance learning in Islamic religious and character education textbooks. Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion, 8(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.18784/analisa.v8i1.1901
Mulyana, D. (2005). Ilmu komunikasi suatu pengantar. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ng, E. S., & Lillevik, W. (2017). Intercultural communication in the world of business. In Intercultural Communication. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501500060-027
Nye, M. (2019). Postcolonial formations of power and whiteness. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 31(3), 210–237. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26743839
Nys, T., & Engelen, B. (2021). Tough on tolerance: The vice of virtue. In The Palgrave Handbook of Toleration. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42121-2_30
Okditazeini, V. (2022). The role of MAFINDO (Masyarakat Anti Fitnah Indonesia) in maintaining religious harmony. Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion, 7(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.18784/analisa.v7i1.1575
Rozak, A. (2008). Komunikasi lintas agama: Modal sosial pembentukan masyarakat sipil. Jurnal Dakwah, 9, 13–28. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/dakwah/jurnaldakwah/article/view/2008.09102
Russo, M. T. (2010). Communication (action with communicative content). La Clinica Terapeutica, 161(2), 193–194.
Sari, A. F., Rusnaini, R., & Rejekiningsih, T. (2019). Dialog of interfaith and interbelief communities of pantura (tali akrap): an overview from the structural functional theory. Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion, 4(02), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.18784/analisa.v4i02.920
Sebastião, S. P. (2021). Introduction: The rationale for a communication perspective. In S. P. Sebastião & S. de C. Spínola (Eds.), Diplomacy, organisations and citizens: A European communication perspective (pp. 1–12). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81877-7_1
Suparlan, P. (2014). Menuju masyarakat Indonesia yang multikultural. Antropologi Indonesia, 0(69), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v0i69.3448
Tillman, D. G. (2019). Values education for young adults. Association for Living Values Education International.
Trisiana, A. (2019). Innovation design development of citizenship education model on characters of indonesian communities in digital media era and technology revolution. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2S9), 322–328. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1074.0982S919
Trisiana, A. (2020). Digital literation models for character education in globalization era. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(1), 522–531. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8164
Trisiana, A., Priyanto, A., & Sutoyo, S. (2024). Analysis of developing anti-corruption education in Indonesia through media-based citizenship education learning smart mobile civic. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v43i1.60261
Verkuyten, M. (2022). The meanings of tolerance: Discursive usage in a case of ‘identity politics.’ Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 52(2), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12339
Verkuyten, M., & Kollar, R. (2021). Tolerance and intolerance: Cultural meanings and discursive usage. Culture and Psychology, 27(1), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X20984356
Weber, R. (Ed.). (2016). Toleranz lernen zur auseinandersetzung mit toleranz und Intoleranz. Landeszentrale für politische Bildung Baden-Württemberg.
Wise, J., & Driskell, R. (2017). Tolerance within community: Does social capital affect tolerance? Social Indicators Research, 134(2), 607–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1449-4
Yang, Z., Fu, X., Yu, X., & Lv, Y. (2018). Longitudinal relations between adolescents’ materialism and prosocial behavior toward family, friends, and strangers. Journal of Adolescence, 62, 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.11.013
Zimmerman, G. I., Owen, J. L., & Seibert, D. R. (1986). Speech communication. West Publishing Company, College & School Division.
