Keywords
authority; constitutional complaint; the Constitutional Court
Document Type
Article
Abstract
This research aims to determine the constitutional rights of citizens through constitutional complaints based on the authority of the Constitutional Court from the perspective of Constitutional Law. Types of normative juridical research with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The data sources used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The research results show that constitutional complaints as the authority of the Constitutional Court have become an urgent need to be enforced in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. The authority for constitutional complaints to the Constitutional Court is eliminated, the legal implication of which is to create protection for the human rights of Indonesian citizens from actions by government officials or individuals who injure citizens' human rights and recognition of the Constitution. The Court as an institution has the authority to submit constitutional complaints to the Constitutional Court. Authorised institution. Guardian of the Constitution. The Constitutional Court protects the constitutional rights of citizens if their constitutional rights are violated by the provisions of the law so that the law is then declared to be contrary to the Constitution. The possibility of violations of citizens' constitutional rights does not only occur through normative provisions in law. There are many ways and opportunities for citizens' constitutional rights violations, whether by the authorities or other parties. This is where we learn the importance of the Constitutional Complaints mechanism at the Constitutional Court.
First Page
171
Last Page
185
Page Range
171-185
Issue
1
Volume
20
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jc.v21i1.66414
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v21i1.66414
Recommended Citation
Adnyani, N. K., Landrawan, I. W., & Agustini, D. A. (2024). Regulating constitutional complaint cases is the authority of the constitutional court. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 21(1), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v21i1.66414
References
Adnyani, N. K. S. (2021). Perlindungan hukum kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat dalam pengelolaan pariwisata berbasis kearifan lokal. Media Komunikasi FPIPS, 20(2), 70-80. https://doi.org/10.23887/mkfis.v20i2.33738
Adnyani, N. K. S., Atmaja, G. M. W., & Sudantra, I. K. (2021). Indigenous people between recognition and disclaimer of legal pluralism perspective. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(9), 352-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i9.2762
Alfiyah, N., & Riyanto, S. (2019). The effect of compensation, work environment and training on employees’ performance of politeknik LP3I Jakarta. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 2(5), 947-955. https://www.ijisrt.com/the-effect-of-compensation-work-environment-and-training-on-employees-performance-of-politeknik-lp3i-jakarta
Asmono, A. (2011). Gagasan pengaduan konstitusional dan penerapannya dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Yuridika, 26(3), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v26i3.273
Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian hukum. Yuridika, 16(1).
Marzuki, P.M. (2010). Penelitian hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Marzuki, P.M. (2017). Penelitian hukum : Edisi revisi. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mulyadi. (2010). Riset desain dalam metodologi penelitian. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi dan Media, 16. (1). 19-28.
Nonet, P., Selznick, P., & Kagan, R. A. (2017). Law and society in transition: Toward responsive law. Routledge.
Palguna, I. D. G. (2010). Constitutional question: latar belakang dan praktik di negara lain serta kemungkinan penerapannya di indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 17(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss1.art1
Perkara Pengujian KUHP yaitu Perkara No. 013-022/PUU-IV/2006 yang diajukan oleh Eggi Sudjana dan Pandopan Lubis, Perkara No. 6/PUU-V/2007 yang diajukan oleh Panji Utomo, Perkara Nomor 7/PUU-VII/2009 yang diajukan oleh Rizal Ramly.
Purnamasari, G. C. (2017). Upaya hukum terhadap pelanggaran hak-hak konstitusional warga negara melalui pengaduan konstitusional (constitutional complaint). Veritas et Justitia, 3(2), 244-269. https://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/veritas/article/view/2668
Rahardjo, S. (2004). Hukum progresif penjelasan suatu gagasan. Universitas Diponegoro.
Rahardjo, S. (2004). Menuju produk hukum progresif. Universitas Diponegoro.
Rahardjo, S. (2005). Hukum progresif: hukum yang membebaskan. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 1(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.1.1.1-24
Salim, H. S., & Nurbani, E. S. (2013). Penerapan teori hukum pada penelitian tesis dan disertasi. PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Setiawan, H. (2017). Mempertimbangkan constitutional complaint sebagai kewenangan mahkamah konstitusi. Lex Jurnalica, 14(1), 146952. https://ejurnal.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/Lex/article/view/1781
Sunggono, B. (2009). Metodologi penelitian hukum. PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Susanti, D.O. & Efendi, A. (2013). Peneltiian hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Taniady, V., & Furqoni, L. (2022). Perluasan kewenangan mahkamah konstitusi: penerapan constitutional complaint dalam menjaga hak konstitusional warga negara. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(1), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i1.6688
Taniady, V., & Furqoni, L. (2022). Perluasan kewenangan mahkamah konstitusi: penerapan constitutional complaint dalam menjaga hak konstitusional warga negara. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(1), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i1.6688
Tanya, B. L., Simanjuntak, Y. N., & Hage, M. Y. (2013). Teori hukum. Genta Publishing.
Zoelva, H. (2012). Constitutional complaint dan constitutional question dan perlindungan hak-hak konstitusional warga negara. Jurnal Media Hukum, 19(1). 153-165. https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/1984
