•  
  •  
 

Keywords

asynchronous; blended learning; civic responsibility

Document Type

Article

Abstract

The development of technology and the world of education today requires complex thinking. Technology can be used to make the learning process easier, more interesting, and more enjoyable. However, learning must continue to focus on the elements of competency achievement that must be achieved and the humanist element. The blended learning model with synchronous and asynchronous systems is one model that can be used in today's technology-based learning era, especially asynchronous systems. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of asynchronous learning in increasing the students’ civic responsibility at one of the universities in Bandung City. Experiments in research are considered more appropriate for answering the research objectives. The research subjects were students of the environmental engineering study program (experimental class) and food engineering study program (control class). The results showed that asynchronous learning was more effective for increasing students' civic responsibility, with an average post-test score of 91.50.

First Page

1

Last Page

8

Page Range

1-8

Issue

1

Volume

20

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jc.v21i1.67361

References

Belladonna, A. P., & Anggraena, S. N. (2019). Penguatan pengetahuan kewarganegaraan (civic knowledge) dalam meningkatkan kesadaran hukum mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 3(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.31571/pkn.v3i2.1442

Branson, M. S. (1998). The role of civic education. Communitarian Network.

Cahyono, C., Danial, E., Affandi, I., & Masyitoh, I. S. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning with the syncronous and asyncronus system in Civic Education courses. Proceedings of the Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2021), 636, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220108.010

Center for Civic Education. (1994). National Standards for Civics and Government. Center for Civic Education.

Chaeruman, U. A. (2013). Merancang model blended learning [Designing blended learning model]. Jurnal Teknodik, 17(4), 399. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v17i4.482

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.

Erwin, M. (2011). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan Republik Indonesia [Civic Education of the Republic of Indonesia]. Refika Aditama.

Fahmi, M. H. (2020). Komunikasi synchronous dan asynchronous dalam e-learning pada masa pandemic COVID-19 [Synchronous and asynchronous communication in e-learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic]. Jurnal Nomosleca, 6(2), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.26905/nomosleca.v6i2.4947

Heinze, A., Procter, C., & Scott, B. (2007). Use of conversation theory to underpin blended learning. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 1(1–2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTCS.2007.014213

Herring, M. C., Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Rosenberg, J. M., & Teske, J. (2016). Introduction to the second edition of the TPACK handbook. In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators (pp. 3–29). Taylor & Francis.

Jumaini, J., Hertin, H. H., Nisfiyati, M., & Ibrahim, M. (2021). penerapan metode pembelajaran blended learning dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep hasil belajar siswa: Sebuah meta - analisis. Al Khawarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.22373/jppm.v5i1.9805

Mulyono, B. (2017). Reorientasi civic disposition dalam kurikulum pendidikan kewarganegaraan sebagai upaya membentuk warga negara yang ideal [Reorientation of civic disposition in the civic education curriculum as an effort to form an ideal citizen]. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 14(2), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.21831/civics.v14i2.17007

Quigley, C. N., & Bahmueller, C. F. (1991). Civitas: A framework for civic education. Center for Civic Education.

Sudarman, S., & Mulawarman, U. (2018). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran blended learning terhadap perolehan belajar konsep dan prosedur pada mahasiswa yang memiliki self-regulated learning berbeda. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, VOLUME, 21(March), 107–117.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D [Research methods of quantitative, qualitative and R&D]. PT Alfabet.

Sundayana, R. (2018). Statistika penelitian pendidikan [Educational research statistics]. Alfabeta.

Surahman, S. (2013). Dampak globalisasi media terhadap seni dan budaya indonesia [The impact of media globalization on indonesian art and culture]. Jurnal Komunikasi, 2(1), 29–38.

Zemmrich, E. (2020). Making sense of shifts in perspectives: Perceiving and framing examples of interreligious learning in Indonesia. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 31(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2020.1782096

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.