Keywords
Mandailing society, regional head general election, voting rights
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Modern society presents a problem where it is increasingly common for minority groups/cultural groups/indigenous groups to show their identity to fulfill their collective right to vote in politics. This study aims to describe the form of democracy that is still hampered because the fulfillment of the voting rights of the Mandailing community is still limited. This research is qualitative descriptive research conducted in the Mandailing community in Kecamataan Sungai Kanan. Data was collected through interviews, observation, and documentation. The collected data is then analyzed using Creswell's techniques which consist of organizing and preparing the data, reading the data, the coding process or general analysis, the coding categorization process that has been made, and describing the themes into qualitative explanations and analysis. The results of this study prove that the level of understanding of the Mandailing community on the importance of the right to vote is still shallow; this is related because the KPU, as the organizer, does not seriously socialize the political rights of citizens. In this case, the right to vote and be elected. Meanwhile, monotonous activities are always represented by the Mandailing community by representing their voting rights to traditional leaders or elders in the area.
First Page
86
Last Page
98
Page Range
86-98
Issue
1
Volume
19
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jc.v19i1.42518
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/civics/article/view/42518
Recommended Citation
Neva, C. F., Gunawati, D., & Triyanto, T. (2022). Fulfillment of the Mandailing community suffrage right in the 2020 regional head election. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 19(1), 86-98. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v19i1.42518
References
Agustino, L. (2007). Perihal imu politik. Graha Ilmu.
Anaya, S. J., & Williams, R. A. (2001). The protection of indigenous peoples' rights over lands and natural resources under the Inter-American Human Rights System (Vol. 33). HUM. RTS.
Belcastro, A. T. (2015). Rebalancing quality education in a democratic society. Creative Education, 6(4), 428-439. https://doi.org/10.4236/CE.2015.64043
Bijl, P., & van Klinken, G. (2019). Citizenship in Asian history. Citizenship Studies, 23(3), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2019.1603268
Campbell, M. S. (2007). The right of indigenous peoples to political participation and the case of Yatama V. Nicaragua. https://law.arizona.edu/yatma-v-nicaragua
Cisse, J. M. (1976). Multilateral: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 19 December 1966. United Nations.
Convention, A. (2006). Organization of American States [OAS], American Convention on Human Rights art.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design Qualitatif, Quantitatif and Mixed Method Approaches. Sage Publication.
Crick, B. (2002). Democracy: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Crick, B. (2007). Citizenship: The political and the democratic. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(3), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00377.x
Damsar. (2010). Pengantar Sosiologi Politik. Prenada Media Group.
Hidayat, Y. (2018). Menyelamatkan Hak Pilih. DetikNews.
Hikam, M. A. S. (1999). Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. PSHTN-FHUI.
Khoirudin. (2004). Pemilihan Umum dan Kedaulatan Rakyat. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Konstitusi, M. (2003). Putusan Nomor 011-017/PUU-I/2003.
Latuharhary. (2018). Negara wajib memenuhi hak pilih masyarakat adat. Komnasham.Go.Id.
Marijan, K. (2010). Sistem Politik Indonesia Konsolidasi Demokrasi Pasca Orde Baru. Kencana Predana Media Group.
Milton, J. (1979). Hans Wehr; A Dictionary of modern written Arabic. Oto Harrassowitz.
Perkins, G. (2000). What is Suffrage? Abby Rhinehart.
Perry, M. J. (2007). Toward a Theory of Human Rights; Religion, Law, Courts. Cambridge University Press.
Pratama, T. G. (2019). Pemenuhan hak-hak politik terhadap penyandang disabilitas dalam pemilu serentak di Kota Bengkulu Tahun 2019 menurut hukum positif dan hukum Islam (Studi di Komisi Pemilihan Umum Kota Bengkulu). Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bengkulu.
Rosyada, D. (2004). Paradigma Pendidikan Demokratis. Kencana.
Sant, E. (2019). Democratic Education: A Theoretical Review (2006-2017). Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 655-696. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319862493
Schudson, M. (2001). Politics as cultural practice. Political Communication, 18(4), 421-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600152647128
Shephard, K., & Brown, K. (2017). How democratic is higher education for sustainable development? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(5), 755-767. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2016.1150254
Surbakti, R., Supriyanto, D., & Asy'ari, H. (2011). Menjaga kedaulatan pemilih (S. Pramono (ed.)). Kemitraan bagi Pembaharuan Tata Pemerintahan.
Turpel, M. E. (1992). Indigenous peoples' rights of political participation and self-determination: recent international legal developments and the continuing struggle for recognition. Cornell International Law Journal, 25(3), 579-602. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol25/iss3/6/
Undang-Undang. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia [Pasal 23 ayat (1); Pasal 43 ayat (1); dan Pasal 49 ayat (1)] dan UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2005 mengenai Pengesahan International Covenant On Civil And Political Rights (Kovenan Internasional Tentang Ha.
Nikaragua Case, (2005).
