•  
  •  
 

PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika

Keywords

berpikir kreatif, kreatif matematis

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas pada materi Sistem Persamaan Linier Dua Variabel secara keseluruhan kemampuan siswa, berdasarkan kategori kemampuan, dan berdasarkan kemampuan setiap indikator kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa dari kelas X sebanyak 30 siswa pada salah satu Sekolah Menengah Atas di kota Garut, Jawa Barat-Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan tes kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan wawancara. Indikator kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang diukur meliputi: fluency (berpikir lancar); flexibility (berpikir luwes); originality (keaslian); elaboration (berpikir elaborasi). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) secara keseluruhan kemampuan berpikir kreatif sebesar 60,65% termasuk kategori cukup; (2) berdasarkan kategori kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis menunjukkan bahwa 86,25% siswa berkemampuan sangat baik, 73,92% kategori baik, 53,31% kategori cukup, dan 35,00% kategori kurang; (3) kemampuan berpikir kreatif berdasarkan indikator a) Fluency siswa sebesar 56,67% (kategori cukup), b) Flexibility siswa 26,67% (kategori kurang), c) Originality siswa sebesar 40,00% (kategori cukup), dan d) Elaboration siswa sebesar 46,67% (kategori cukup). Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa masih belum optimal dan memerlukan perhatian bagi pendidikan dan pemangku kebijakan pendidikan.

Analyzing mathematical creative thinking skills of senior high school students in Algebra

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the mathematical creative thinking skills of senior high school students in solving two-variable linear equation systems problems generally, based on the ability category, and on the ability of each indicator of the mathematical creative thinking ability. The research subjects are 30 grade X students of one of the high schools in the city of Garut, West Java-Indonesia. This research is a qualitative descriptive study employed the purposive sampling technique. The research instrument includes a creative thinking skills test and interview guide. The indicators of creative thinking abilities that are measured include fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration. The results show: (1) the ability to think creatively has a percentage of 60.65% (sufficient category); (2) the mathematical creative thinking ability: 86.25% in very good category, 73.92% in good category, 53.31% in moderate category (53.31%), and 35.00% in an insufficient category; (3) the ability to think creatively based on indicators shows a) fluency has a percentage of 56.67% (sufficient category, b) flexibility has a percentage of 26.67% (poor category), c) originality has a percentage of 40.00 % (sufficient category), and d) elaboration has a percentage of 46.67% (sufficient category). This implies that teachers and policymakers need to pay attention to students' mathematical creative thinking skills.

Page Range

253-265

Issue

2

Volume

16

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pythagoras.v16i2.40007

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/40007

References

Aisyah, P. N., Khasanah, S. umi N., Yuliani, A., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2018). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SMP pada materi segiempat dan segitiga. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 1(5), 1025. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i5.p1025-1036

Arifin, U., & Purwasih, R. (2017). Penerapan pembelajaran berbasis alternative solutions worksheet untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematik. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Univ, Muhammadiyah Metro Vol. 6, No. 2.

Arista, E. D. W., & Mahmudi, A. (2020). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis dalam penyelesaian soal open-ended jenis PISA berdasarkan level sekolah. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v15i1.34606

Bakker, A., & Cai, J. (2021). Future themes of mathematics education research : an international survey before and during the pandemic.Copur-gencturk, Y. (2021). Teachers ’ Conceptual Understanding of Fraction Operations : Results from a National Sample of Elementary School Teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, January.

Drijvers, P., Kodde-Buitenhuis, H., & Doorman, M. (2019). Assessing mathematical thinking as part of curriculum reform in the Netherlands. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(3), 435–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09905-7

Eka, P., Nuurjannah, I., Hendriana, H., Fitrianna, A. Y., Cimahi, S., & E-mail, K. P. (2018). Faktor mathematical habits of mind dan kemampuan literasi matematis siswa SMP di Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 51–58.

Ekawati, E. (2011). Peran, Fungsi, Tujuan, dan Karakteristik Matematika Sekolah. http://p4tkmatematika.org/2011/10/peran-fungsi-tujuan-dan-karakteristik-matematika-sekolah/

Fardah, D. K. (2012). Analisis proses dan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam matematika melalui tugas open ended. Jurnal Kreano Vol 3(2).Fitriarosah, N. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen berpikir kreatif matematis untuk siswaSMP. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Vol 1.

Gazali, R. Y., & Atsnan, M. F. (2017). Peningkatan motivasi dan minat belajar matematika siswa melalui pendekatan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran matematika yang bermakna. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 123–134.

Hankeln, C. (2020). Mathematical modeling in Germany and France: a comparison of students’ modeling processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09931-5

Happy, N., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2014). Keefektifan PBL ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif matematis, serta self-esteem siswa SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 48–57. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/2663/2216

Ismara, L., & Suratman, D. (2016). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal open ended di smp. 1–8.Kohen, Z., & Orenstein, D. (2021). Mathematical modeling of tech-related real-world problems for secondary school-level mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10020-1

Kollosche, D. (2021). Styles of reasoning for mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, February. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10046-z

Levenson, E. (2013). Tasks that may occasion mathematical creativity: Teachers’ choices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(4), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9229-9

Ma, E. T., Borsa, T., Şehit, İ., Sami, U., Anadolu, Ş., & Mersin, T. (2019). Integrating 4Cskills of 21st century into 4 language skills in EFL classes vacide erdoğan. 7(11), 113–124.Mahmudi, A., & Sumarmo, U. (2011). Pengaruh strategi mathematical habits of Mind Mhmberbasis masalah terhadap kreativitas siswa. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 2, 216–229. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v0i2.4229

Maizora, S., & Rosjanuardi, R. (2021). Konsepsi siswa kelas tiga sekolah dasar tentang bilangan bulat. Pythagoras: JurnalPendidikan Matematika, 15(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v15i2.37645

Marliani, N. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa melalui model pembelajaran missouri mathematics project (MMP). FORMATIF: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 5(1), 14–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v5i1.166

Miliyawati, B. (2014). Urgensi strategi disposition habits of mind matematis. Infinity Journal, 3(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v3i2.62

Molad, O., Levenson, E. S., & Levy, S. (2020). Individual and group mathematical creativity among post–high school students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09952-5

Nurlaela, L., Ismayati, E., Samani, M., Suparji, S., & Buditjahjanto, I.G.P.A. (2019). Strategi Belajar Berpikir Kreatif (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Pustaka Media Guru.

Pradana, D. A. Y., & Murtiyasa, B. (2020). Kemampuan siswa menyelesaikan masalah berbentuk soal cerita sistem persamaan linear ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v15i2.35419

Prasetyani, A. I. (2014). Upaya Penerapan Strategi Mathematical Habits of Mind Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa.

Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9127-3

Rahayu, E. L., Akbar, P., & Afrilianto, M. (2018). Pengaruh metode mind mapping terhadap strategi thinking aloud pair problem solving terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis. Journal on Education, 1(2), 271-278.

Rasnawati, A., Rahmawati, W., Akbar, P., & Putra, H. D. (2019). Analisis kemampuan berfikir kreatif matematis siswa SMK pada materi sistem persamaan linier dua variabel (SPLDV) di Kota Cimahi. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v3i1.87

Setiawati, E. (2014). Mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir logis, kreatif, dan habit of mind matematis, melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Unpublished Dissertation. Bandung: SPs Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Suratih, S., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita program linear berdasarkan Newman’s error analysis. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v15i2.30990

Suriany, E. (2016). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa sma melalui pembelajaran math-talk learning. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education,3(5), 296–305. http://idealmathedu.p4tkmatematika.org/wp-content/uploads/IME-V3.5-02.

Erma_Suriany.pdfThanheiser, E., Melhuish, K., Sugimoto, A., Rosencrans, B., & Heaton, R. (2021). Networking frameworks: A method for analyzing the complexities of classroom cultures focusing on justifying. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 285-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10026-3

Van Harpen, X. Y., & Sriraman, B. (2013). Creativity and mathematical problem posing: An analysis of high school students’ mathematical problem posing in China and the USA. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9419-5

Widiani, T., Rif'at, M., & Ijuddin, R. (2016). Penerapan pendekatan saintifik dan pengaruhnya terhadap kemampuan komunikasi matematis dan berpikir kreatif siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 5(1), 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v5i1.13550

Download

Share

COinS