PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika
Keywords
pengembangan, perangkat pembelajaran, PBL
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran matematika dengan model PBL yang berkualitas baik. Perangkat pembelajaran yang dikembangkan terdiri dari Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) dan Lembar Kegiatan Siswa (LKS). Penelitian ini adalah penelitian pengembangan yang menggunakan model pengembangan ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, dan Evaluation). Subjek uji coba penelitian adalah 65 siswa (33 siswa dari kelas VIII A dan 32 siswa dari kelas VIII D) dan satu guru di SMP N 2 Karangnongko Klaten. Penelitian ini mengembangkan perangkat pembelajaran matematika dengan model PBL berupa Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) dan Lembar Kegiatan Siswa (LKS) yang valid, praktis, dan efektif. Hasil validasi menunjukkan perangkat yang dikembangkan valid dengan kriteria sangat baik. Kepraktisan pada uji coba lapangan mencapai kategori sangat baik dengan rata-rata keterlaksanaan 94,03%. Keefektifan perangkat yang dikembangkan terlihat dari (1) ketuntasan belajar secara klasikal sudah mencapai kriteria minimal 75% yaitu untuk tes prestasi belajar mencapai 89,23%; (2) hasil tes kemampuan berpikir kreatif mencapai 84,62%; dan (3) berdasarkan angket tingkat inisiatif siswa, 95,38% siswa menunjukkan peningkatan skor tingkat inisiatif belajar, dan 84,62% siswa menunjukkan tingkat inisiatif belajar dengan kriteria minimal tinggi.
Kata Kunci: pengembangan, perangkat pembelajaran, PBL
Developing Instructional Kits with PBL Model Oriented to Creative Thingking and the Initiation of the Students
Abstract
This research aims to produce mathematics instructional kits with PBL's model which has good quality. The instructional kits which are developed consists of lesson plans and student's worksheets. This study was research and development that used ADDIE's model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). The subjects of this research involved 65 students (33 students of class VIII A and 32 students of class VIII D) and one teacher at SMP N 2 Karangnongko Klaten. This research developed the instructional kits of mathematic with PBL model with the student's worksheet and the lesson plans which are valid, practical and effective. The result of validation shows that the kits developed are valid in a very good criterion. The practicality on field trials achieves excellent category with an average adherence to 94.03%. Effectiveness of instructional kits are developed by (1) classical learning completeness reaching at least 89.23%; (2) result of thinking creative test reaching at least 84.62%; and (3) based on the questionnaire of the level of initiative student, 95.38% of students shows increased scores for the level of initiative learning, and 84.62% of the student shows the level of initiative learning with minimum category of "high".
Keywords: development, intructional kits, PBL
Page Range
2024-11-01
Issue
1
Volume
12
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/pg.v12i1.14052
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/14052
Recommended Citation
Cahyono, A. E. (2017). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran dengan model PBL berorientasi pada kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan inisiatif siswa. PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i1.14052
References
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed). New York, NY: Mc Graw Hill Companies.
Arends, R. I, & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning becoming an accomplished teacher. New York, NY: Routledge.
Baldwin, D. A., Wilkinson, F. C., & Barkley, D. C. (2000). Effective management of student employment. Colorado: Greenwood.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York, NY: Springer Science Bussiness Media, Inc.
Delisle, R. (1997). How to use problem-based learning in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Gable, R. K. (1986). Instrument development in the affective domain. Boston, CA: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing.
Gauthier, G., Frasson, C., & VanLehn, K. (2000). Inteligent tutoring system. Montreal: Springer.
Happy, N & Widjajanti, D. B. (2014). Keefektifan PBL ditinjau dari kemampuana berpikir kritis dan kreeatif matematis, serta self-esteem siswa SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 48-57.
Kargar, F. R., Ajilchi, B., Choreishi, M. K., & Zangene, Z. Z. (2013). The effect of teaching critical and creative thinking skills on the locus of control and psychological well-being in adolescents. Prosedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82(1), 51-56.
Negovan, V. & Bogdan, C. (2013). Learning context and undergraduate students' needs for autonomy and competence, achievement motivation and personal growth initiative. Prosedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78(1), 300-304.
Nieveen, N. (1999). Design approaches and tools in education and training. Dordrecht: ICO Cluwer academic publisher.
Noer, S. H. (2011). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis dan pembelajaran matematika berbasis masalah open-ended. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 5(1), 104-111.
Nugroho, I. A., Chotim, M., & Dwijanto, D. (2013). Keefektifan pendekatan problem-based learning terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematik. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2 (1), 137-152.
Repubik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Wilson, V. (2010). Measurement and assessment in education. Upper Sadle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Safitri, D. & Hadi, C. (2015). Perbedaan inisiatif personal ditinjau dari persepsi budaya organisasi karyawan [Versi Elektronik]. Jurnal Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi, 4 (3), 313-322.
Sanusi, U. (2013). Pembelajaran dengan pendekatan humanistik: Penelitian pada MTs Negeri Model Cigugur Kuningan. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam-Ta'lim, 11(2), 123-142.
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Zentralblattfur Dikdaktik der Mathematik, 97(1), 75-80.
Tan, O. S. (2003). Problem-based learning innovation: using problems to power learning in the 21st century. Shenton Way, Singapore: Cengage Learning.
Widoyoko, E. P. (2009). Evaluasi program pembelajaran panduan praktis bagi pendidik dan calon pendidik, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.