Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika
Keywords
pendekatan problem solving dengan setting STAD, pendekatan problem solving dengan setting TAI, prestasi belajar, self-confidence
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan dan perbandingan keefektifan dari pendekatan problem solving dengan setting pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD, pendekatan problem solving dengan setting pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TAI, serta pendekatan konvensional ditinjau dari aspek prestasi belajar matematika dan self-confidence siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain nonequivalent group pretest-posttest design. Populasi penelitian mencakup seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Prambanan. Selanjutnya dengan memilih secara acak dari keseluruhan kelas tersebut, terpilih kelas VIII A, VIII C dan VIII D sebagai sampel penelitian. Uji keefektifan masing-masing pendekatan pembelajaran menggunakan one sample t-test. Selanjutnya untuk menguji perbandingan keefektifan dari ketiga pendekatan pembelajaran, data dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji Tukey HSD. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) ketiga pendekatan pembelajaran efektif ditinjau dari masing-masing aspek; (2) pendekatan problem solving dengan setting pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan pendekatan problem solving dengan setting pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TAI, masing-masing lebih unggul dari pada pendekatan konvensional ditinjau dari masing-masing aspek, sedangkan antara pendekatan problem solving dengan setting pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TAI dengan pendekatan problem solving dengan setting pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan ditinjau dari masing-masing aspek.
Kata Kunci: pendekatan problem solving dengan setting STAD, pendekatan problem solving dengan setting TAI, prestasi belajar, self-confidence.
The Effectiveness of Problem Solving Approach in STAD and TAI Setting Viewed from the Students' Achievement and Self-Confidence
Abstract
The aim of this research was to describe the effectiveness and comparison the effectiveness of the problem solving approach in STAD setting, problem solving approach in TAI setting, and conventional approach viewed from students' achievement and self-confidence.. This research was a nonequivalent group pretest-posttest design.The research population covered the entire VIII class students' of SMP Negeri 1 Prambanan. From the population, classes of VIIIA, VIII C and VIII D were selected randomly as the research sample. The effectiveness of problem solving approach in STAD setting, problem solving approach in TAI setting, and conventional approachused one sample t-test. Furthermore, The comparison of the problem solving approach in STAD setting, problem solving approach in TAI setting, and conventional approach used Tukey HSD test. The research result suggests that (1) the problem solving approach in STAD setting, problem solving approach in TAI setting, and conventional approach were effective viewed from each aspect, (2) the problem solving approach in STAD setting and problem solving approach in TAI setting were more effective than conventional approach viewed from each aspect, but between the problem solving approach in TAI setting and problem solving approach in STAD setting, there is no significant difference viewed from the students' achievement and self-confidence Keywords: problem solving approach in STAD setting, problem solving approach in TAI setting, students' achievement, self-confidence.
Page Range
1-15
Issue
1
Volume
3
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jrpm.v3i1.9825
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/9825
Recommended Citation
Martyanti, A. (2016). Keefektifan pendekatan problem solving dengan setting STAD dan TAI ditinjau dari prestasi dan self-confidence. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i1.9825
References
Astuti, R., & Abadi, A. (2015). Keefektifan pembelajaran jigsaw dan TAI ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran dan sikap belajar matematika siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 235 - 250. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i2.7339
Ee Ng, D. K. & Stillman, G. (2007). Interdisciplinary learning: development of mathematical confidence, value, and the interconnectedness of mathematics. Proceeding of 30th annual conference of mathematics education research group of Australia, Australia, 2, 533-542.
Fahrurrozi, F., & Mahmudi, A. (2014). Pengaruh PBM dalam setting pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan GI terhadap prestasi belajar dan kecerdasan emosional siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 1-11. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i1.2653
Ghufron, M. N. & Risnawita S., R. (2012). Teori-teori psikologi. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Gok & Silay. (2010). The effects of problem solving strategies on students' achievement, attitude adn motivation. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, l (4), 7-21.
Goldsmith, B. (2010). 100 Ways to boost your self-confidence. Franklin Lakes: The Career Press.
Haylock, D. & Tangata, F. (2007). Key concept in teaching primary mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publication.
Husni, M. (2014). Keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan problem posing dan problem solving ditinjau dari prestasi dan curiosity. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 11-21. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v9i1.9058
Jacobsen, D.A., Eggan, P. & Kauchak, D. (2009) Methods for teaching: metode-metode pengajaran meningkatkan belajar siswa TK-SMA. (terjemahan Achmad Fawaid & Khoirul Anam). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Kemdiknas. (2011). Instrumen penilaian hasil belajar matematika SMP: belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Yogyakarta: PROGRAM BERMUTU (Better Education through Reformed Management and Universal Teacher Upgrading). Diakses tanggal 20 September 2012, dari www.p4tkmatematika.org
Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. Pasific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
Lie, A. (2003). 101 Cara menumbuhkan percaya diri anak. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo
Lindenfield, G. (1997). Mendidik anak agar percaya diri. (Terjemahan Ediati Kamil). Jakarta: Penerbit Arcan.
Mendikbud. (2013a). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan republik indonesia nomor 65 tahun 2013 tentang standar proses pendidikan dasar dan menengah.
Mendikbud. (2013b). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan republik indonesia nomor 68 tahun 2013 tentang kerangka dasar dan struktur kurikulum sekolah menengah pertama/madrasahtsanawiyah.
Margono, G. (2005). Pengembangan instrumen pengukur rasa percaya diri mahasiswa terhadap matematika. [Versi Elektronik]. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 12(1), 45-61.
McElmeel, S. L. (2002). Character education: A book guide for theacers, librarians, and parents. Greenwood Village: Greenwood Publishing Group. Inc.
McGee, P. (2010). Self-confidence the remarkable truth of why a small change can make a big difference. West Sussex: Capstone Publishing Ltd.
Mullis, I. V. S., et.al. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standard for school mathematics. Reston VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
Nitko, A. J. & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assesment of students. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Meril Prentice Hall.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results in focus: what 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Diakses tanggal 25 Desember 2013, dari http://www.oecd.org/A/
Polya, G. (1985). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton: Princenton University Press.
Posamentier, A. S. & Krulik, S. (2009). Problem solving in mathematics grade 3-6: powerful strategies to deepen understanding. California: Cowin, a SAGE Company.
Preston, L. D. (2007). 365 Steps to self-confidence. Oxford: How To Content.
Shanti, W., & Abadi, A. (2015). Keefektifan pendekatan problem solving dan problem posing dengan setting kooperatif dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 121 - 134. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i1.7155
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: theory, research, and practice.(2nd ed). New York, NY: Pearson Education, Inc.
Slavin, R. E. (2008). Educational psychology: theory, research, and practice. (8th ed). London, UK: Pearson Education, Inc.
Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Suhendri, H. (2012, November). Pengaruh kecerdasan matematis-logis, rasa percaya diri, dan kemandirian belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika di Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Susanto, H. P. (2011). Keefektifan pembelajaran tipe tipe Student Team-Achievement Divisions (STAD) dan Team-Assisted Individualization (TAI) di kelas bilingual ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan motivasi belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran sistem persamaan linear dua variabel di SMP kelas VIII. Tesis, tidak dipublikasikan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Van de Walle, J. (2008). Sekolah dasar dan menengah: pengembangan pengajaran. (terjemahan Suyono). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Walpole, R. E. (1995). Pengantar statistika.(terjemahan Bambang Sumantri). Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.
Wartiningsih, K. (2011). Pengaruh model kooperatif dalam pembelajaran Trigonometri terhadap prestasi akademik, toleransi dan kepercayaan diri siswa SMA N di Klaten. Tesis, tidak dipublikasikan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Yates, S. M. (2002). The Influence of optimism and pessimism on student achievement in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal,14(1), 4-15.
Zahar, I. (2009). Belajar matematikaku pembelajaran matematika secara visual dan kinestetik. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Ziemba. L. (2007). Increasing Student Confidence and Knowledge through Student Presentation. Tesis, tidak dipublikasikan, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.