Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran limit berbasis pendekatan saintifik berorientasi prestasi belajar dan kemampuan komunikasi matematika

Authors

Juliana Rakony Untayana, Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Musamus Merauke Jalan Kamizaun Mopah Lama, Kec. Merauke, Papua 99611, Indonesia
Idris Harta, Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Jalan A. Yani Tromol Pos 1, Pabelan, Kartasura, Jawa Tengah 57162, Indonesia

Keywords

perangkat pembelajaran, pendekatan saintifik, kemampuan komunikasi matematika

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan produk berupa perangkat pembelajaran matematika SMK menggunakan pendekatan saintifik berorientasi prestasi belajar dan kemampuan komunikasi matematika. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian pengembangan dengan model four-D dari Thiagarajan. Model ini terdiri atas empat tahapan pengembangan yaitu define (pendefenisian), design (desain), develop (pengembangan) dan desseminate (penyebaran). Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah dengan mengelompokan data berdasarkan kualifikasi produk, kemudian dilakukan perhitungan untuk memperoleh nilai rata-rata yang dimasukkan dalam kategori penilaian skala Likert. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah produk perangkat pembelajaran matematika SMK menggunakan pendekatan saintifik yang berorientasi pada prestasi belajar dan kemampuan komunikasi matematika siswa SMK yang terdiri atas RPP, LKS dan TPB. Setelah melalui tahapan validasi, produk RPP produk dinyatakan valid, produk perangkat memenuhi kategori sangat praktis, dan hasil tes prestasi belajar dan kemampuan komunikasi matematika memenuhi kategori efektif. Produk pengembangan yang dihasilkan telah memenuhi kriteria valid, praktis dan efektif, maka produk layak dimanfaatkan untuk pembelajaran di kelas.

Kata Kunci: perangkat pembelajaran, pendekatan saintifik, kemampuan komunikasi matematika

Developing Scientific-Approach-Based Learning Kit of Limit Oriented to Mathematics Learning Achievements and Communication Skills

Abstract

This study is aimed at producing mathematics learning kit for SMK using the scientific approach oriented to students' mathematics learning achievements and communication skills.This research was a research and development employing the four-D model by Thiagarajan. The model consisted of four development stages, namely define, design, develop, and disseminate. The research instruments were validation sheets, practicallity sheets, and learning achievement tests. The data were analyzed by grouping the data based on the product qualification and then calculations were made to obtain mean scores classified into categories in the Likert scale assessment. The results of the study are a product in the form of mathematics learning kit for SMK using the scientific approach oriented to students' mathematics learning achievements and communication skills, consisting of lesson plans, student worksheets, and learning achievement tests. Through the product validation stage, the lesson plans are considered to be valid. The product is very practical, and the results of the mathematics learning achievement and communication skill tests show that the product is effective. The developed product is valid, practical, and effective, and is appropriate to be used in classroom. Keywords: learning kit, scientific approach, mathematics communication skills

Page Range

45-54

Issue

1

Volume

3

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jrpm.v3i1.9683

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/9683

Recommended Citation

Untayana, J. R., & Harta, I. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran limit berbasis pendekatan saintifik berorientasi prestasi belajar dan kemampuan komunikasi matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i1.9683

References

Aragon, A. (2007). Girth control. The science of fat loss and muscle Gain. Alan Aragon Publishing.

Azwar, S. (2009). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Brodie, K. (2010). Teaching mathematical reasoning in secondary school classroom. London: Springer.

Cai, J., Lane, S. & Jakabcsin, M. S. (1996). The role of open ended tasks and holistic scoring rubrics: Assesing student' mathematical reasoning communication. Reston, VA: NCTM

Cooke, B. D., & Buchholz, D. (2005). Mathematical communication in the classroom: a teacher makes a difference. Early Childhood Education Jurnal, 32(6), 365-369. Retrive from: http:// http://link.springer.com/ article/10.1007/s10643-005-0007-5

Daryanto, dkk. (2014). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Gava Media

Dyer, J. et al. (2011). The innovators DNA. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press

Eggen P., & Kaucak, D. (2012). Strategi dan model pembelajaran (mengajarkan kontent dan ketrampilan berpikir). (Terjemahan Satrio Wahono). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Greenes, C. & Schulman, L. (1996). Communication processes in mathematical explorations and investigations. Dalam P. C. Elliot & M. J. Kennedy (Eds.), 1996 yearbook: Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond (pp. 159-169). Reston, Va.: NCTM.

Hosnan. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia

Johnson, R. L. et al. (2009). Assesing performance: Designing, scoring, and validating performance task. New York: Guilford.

Kemp. J. E., Morrison, G. R & Ros, S. M. (1994). Designing effective instruction. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company.

Kusnaeni, K., & Retnawati, H. (2013). Problem posing dalam setting kooperatif tipe TAI ditinjau dari kemampuan komunikasi dan pemecahan masalah. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 33-43. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v8i1.8492

Kyriacou, C. (2009). Effective teaching in school: Theory and practice. Third edition. London: Nelson Thornes

Moon, B., Meyes, A. S., & Hutchinson, S. (2002). Teaching, learning and the curriculum in secondary school. New York: Routledge Falmer

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standars for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Nazarudin. (2007). Manajemen pembelajaran, implementasi konsep, karakteristik dan metodologi agama Islam di sekolah umum. Yogyakarta: Teras.

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: what students know and can do - student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume 1, Revised Edition, February 2014). PISA: OECD Publishing.

Posamentier, A. S., Jaye, D., & Krulik, S. (2007). Exemplary practices for secondary math teachers. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Pugalee, D. K. (2001). Using communication to develop students' mathematical literacy. Journal Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(5), 296-299.

Rahmawati ES, Y., & Harta, I. (2014). Keefektifan pendekatan open-ended dan ctl ditinjau dari hasil belajar kognitif dan afektif. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 113-126. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i1.2669

Sutherland, R. (2007). Teaching for learning mathematics. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Thiagarajan S., Semmel D., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Minneapolis, MA: Central for Innovation on Teaching the Handicaped.

Varelas, M., & Ford, M. (2009). The scientific method and scientific inquiry: Tensions in teaching and learning. Journal Science Education, 94, 29-47

Wilder, S. J., et al. (Eds.). (2011). Learning to teach mathematics in the secondary school: a companion to school experience (3rd ed). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Winkel, W. S (2014). Psikologi pengajaran. Jakarta: Gramedia