Keywords
pengembangan, perangkat pembelajaran, geometri, model pembelajaran CORE, efikasi diri, development, learning kit, geometry, CORE learning model, self-efficacy
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran yang diadaptasi dari model CORE (Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, dan Extending) yang valid, praktis, dan efektif untuk meningkatkan efikasi diri siswa. Pengembangan perangkat menggunakan model pengembangan Borg dan Gall yang dimodifikasi oleh peneliti dengan tahapan: (1) studi pendahuluan, (2) perencanaan, (3) pengembangan rancangan produk awal, (4) uji coba terbatas, (5) revisi tahap I, (6) uji coba operasional, (7) revisi tahap II, dan (8) desiminasi produk akhir. Uji coba produk dilakukan di SMA Negeri 1 Prambanan Sleman dengan melibatkan 52 siswa dan seorang guru matematika. Instrumen yang digunakan terdiri atas lembar validasi, lembar observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran, lembar penilaian guru terhadap kepraktisan perangkat pembelajaran, angket penilaian siswa terhadap kepraktisan LKS dan proses pembelajaran, dan angket efikasi diri siswa dalam belajar geometri. Hasil penelitian adalah perangkat pembelajaran yang terdiri dari RPP dan LKS dengan mengadaptasi model pembelajaran CORE yang memenuhi kriteria valid, praktis, dan efektif untuk meningkatkan efikasi diri siswa.
This research aimed to produce a valid, practical, and effective learning kits adapted from CORE (Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, and Extending) model to improve student's self-efficacy. The development refered to the modified Borg and Gall model which consists of: (1) preliminary studies, (2) plan, (3) initial product design development, (4) limited trial, (5) revision phase I, (6) operational trials, (7) revision phase II, dan (8) final product dissemination. The product was implemented at SMA Negeri 1 Prambanan Sleman which involved 52 students and the mathematics teacher. The instruments used in this research were validation sheets, the observation sheet of learning implementation, an evaluation sheet for practicality of lesson plans and worksheets by the teacher, the questionnaire for practicality of worksheets and learning process, and student's self-efficacy in geometry learning questionnaire. The result was a valid, practical, and effective learning kits which consist of lesson plans and worksheets adapted from CORE instructional model to improve self-efficacy.
Page Range
39-52
Issue
1
Volume
6
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jrpm.v6i1.11599
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/11599
Recommended Citation
Nugroho, D. A. (2019). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran geometri dengan mengadaptasi model CORE untuk meningkatkan efikasi diri. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v6i1.11599
References
Ayda, E., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2014). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran teorema Pythagoras dengan media berbantuan komputer. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 216. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2677
Azwar, S. (2004). Metode penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, N. Y.: Macmillan.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction. New York: Longman.
Brown, L. J., Malou, J. M., & Schutte, N. S. (2013). Self-efficacy theory (pp. 13-38). Retrieved from http://samples.jbpub.com/9781449689742/Chapter2.pdf
Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. R. (2010). Cognitive psychology and instruction (5th ed.). Boston, MA.: Pearson Education Inc.
Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1997). Education on the edge of possibility. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Curwen, M. S., Miller, R. G., White-smith, K. a., & Calfee, R. C. (2010). Increasing teachers' metacognition develops students' higher learning during content area literacy instruction: Findings from the read-write cycle project. Issues in Teacher Education, 19(2), 127-151.
Deswita, R. (2015). Penerapan model pembelajaran connecting-organizing-reflecting-extending (CORE) dengan pendekatan scientific untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi dan koneksi matematis serta self-efficacy siswa SMP: Studi kuasi eksperimen pada salah satu SMP negeri di P. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/18026/
Dymock, S. (2005). Teaching expository text structure awareness. The Reading Teacher, 59(2), 177-181. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.59.2.7
Gillies, R. M. (2007). Cooperative learning: Integrating theory and practice. California: SAGE Publications.
Günter, M. A., Estes, T. H., & Schwab, J. H. (1990). Instruction: A models approach. Allyn & Bacon.
Henson, K. T., & Eller, B. F. (2012). Educational psychology for effective teaching. Kendall Hunt.
Hoffman, B. (2010). "I think I can, but I'm afraid to try": The role of self-efficacy beliefs and mathematics anxiety in mathematics problem-solving efficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 276-283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.02.001
Hosnan, M., & Sikumbang, R. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21: Kunci sukses implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Khoiriyah, J., Suharto, S., & Trapsilasiwi, D. (2014). Pengembangan rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran dan lembar kerja siswa model pembelajaran CORE dengan teknik mind mapping pokok bahasan bangun ruang sisi lengkung kelas IX SMP. KadikmA, 5(3), 137-146. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/kadikma/article/view/1382
Margolis, H., & Mccabe, P. P. (2006). Improving self-efficacy and motivation: What to do, what to say. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(4), 218-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512060410040401
Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia nomor 64 Tahun 2013 tentang standar isi pendidikan dasar dan menengah, Pub. L. No. 64 (2013). Indonesia.
Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 69 Tahun 2013 tentang kerangka dasar dan struktur kurikulum sekolah/madrasah aliyah menengah atas (2013). Indonesia.
Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan nomor 103, tahun 2014, tentang pembelajaran pada pendidikan dasar dan pendidikan menengah, Pub. L. No. 103, Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia (2014).
Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia nomor 59 tahun 2014 tentang Kurikulum 2013 SMA/MA (2014).
Miller, M. D., Linn, R. L., Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L. (2008). Measurement and assessment in teaching (10 Edition). Boston, MA.: Pearson.
Miller, R. G., & Calfee, R. C. (2004). Making thinking visible: A method to encourage science writing in upper elementary grades. Science and Children, 42(November/December), 20-25.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kemp, J. E., & Kalman, H. (2010). Designing effective instruction. New York, N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons.
National Council of Teacher Mathematics. (2000). Prinsiples and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. In Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training (pp. 125-135). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7_10
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them, Technical report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008. IHMC CmapTools. https://doi.org/Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 2008-01
Nurfayziah, P. (2012). Peningkatan kemampuan koneksi matematis dan self-efficacy siswa SMP melalui pembelajaran matematika model CORE. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/9479/
Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842-866. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00181
Santrock, J. (2010). Educational psychology. Handbook of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.05.020154.002041
Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2), 112-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209508406961
Soekamto, T., & Winataputra, U. S. (1997). Teori belajar dan model-model pembelajaran. Jakarta: PAU-PPAI, Universitas Terbuka.
Suyatno, D. (2009). Menjelajah pembelajaran inovatif. Sidoarjo: Masmedia Buana Pustaka.
Trianto, T. (2010). Model pembelajaran terpadu: Konsep, strategi, dan implementasinya dalam Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. https://doi.org/2010
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.09.002
Wade, C., & Tavris, C. (2007). Psikologi. (T. P. Mursalin & Dinastuti, Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016