Keywords
model SSCS, model konvensional, prestasi belajar, penalaran matematis, motivasi belajar siswa
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan model search, solve, create, and share (SSCS) dan apakah pembelajaran matematika dengan model SSCS lebih baik dibandingkan dengan model konvensional ditinjau dari prestasi, penalaran matematis, dan motivasi belajar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain kontrol grup non-ekuivalen. Populasi dalam penelitian adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Muhammadiyah Banguntapan yang terdiri dari lima kelas. Sampel penelitian diambil dua kelas secara acak, yaitu kelas VIII-D dan VIII-E. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah uji T2 Hotteling's, uji MANCOVA, dan uji lanjut dengan prosedur t-test. Setiap analisis dilakukan pada taraf signifikansi 5%. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pembelajaran matematika dengan model SSCS efektif ditinjau dari prestasi dan motivasi belajar, tetapi tidak efektif ditinjau dari penalaran matematis siswa dan pembelajaran matematika dengan model SSCS lebih baik dibandingkan dengan pembelajaran konvesional ditinjau dari prestasi dan penalaran matematis, tetapi tidak lebih baik ditinjau dari motivasi belajar siswa kelas VIII SMP Muhammadiyah Banguntapan.
Kata Kunci: model SSCS, model konvensional, prestasi belajar, penalaran matematis, motivasi belajar siswa
The Effectiveness of the Model of Search, Solve, Create, and Share Terms of Achievement, Mathematical Reasoning, and Motivation to Learn
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to describe the effectiveness of teaching with the teaching model search, solve, create, and share (SSCS) and to describe whether teaching by teaching model SSCS better than by model conventional regarding students' achievement, mathematical reasoning, and mathematics learning motivation. This research was quasi-experimental with the non-equivalent control group design. The population was all students of class VIII SMP Muhammadiyah Banguntapan consisting of five classes. The sample taken at random consisted of two classes: classes VIII-D dan VIII-E. Class VIII-D was taught by using the model conventional, while class VIII-E was taught by using the SSCS teaching model. The data were analyzed by using a multivariate test Hotelling's T2, MANCOVA test, and tested further by using t-test procedures. Each analysis regarding at the significance level of 5%. The results showed that: the first, the teaching of mathematics by using the SSCS model is effective regarding students' achievement and students' mathematics learning motivation, but it is not effective in terms of mathematical reasoning Banguntapan Muhammadiyah junior high school students of class VIII. The second, the SSCS teaching model is better than the conventional teaching model regarding students' achievement and mathematical reasoning abilities, but not better terms of students' mathematics learning the mathematics of class VIII SMP Muhammadiyah Banguntapan.
Keywords: teaching model of SSCS, teaching model of conventional, academic achievement, mathematical reasoning ability, mathematics learning motivation
Page Range
87-99
Issue
1
Volume
4
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jrpm.v4i1.7863
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/7863
Recommended Citation
Satriawan, R. (2017). Keefektifan model search, solve, create, and share ditinjau dari prestasi, penalaran matematis, dan motivasi belajar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i1.7863
References
Ali, R., Hukamdad, D., Akhter, A., & Khan, A. (2010). Effect of using problem solving method in teaching mathematics on the achievement of mathematics students. Asian Social Science, 6(2), 67. http://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n2p67
BNSP. (2012). Laporan Hasil Ujian Nasional SMP/MTS Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012. [Versi Elektronik].
BNSP. (2013). Laporan Hasil Ujian Nasional SMP/MTS Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. [Versi Elektronik].
Brodie, K. (2010). Teaching mathematical reasoning in secondary school classrooms. (K. Brodie, Ed.). Boston, MA: Springer US. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09742-8
Brophy, J. E. (2010). Motivating students to learn (3rd Edition). New York: Routledge.
Brown, T., & McNamara, O. (2011). Becoming a mathematics teacher. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0554-8
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experiment al designs for research. Bosston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. Retrieved from https://www.sfu.ca/~palys/Campbell&Stanley-1959-Exptl&QuasiExptlDesignsForResearch.pdf
Chen, W.-H. (2013). Applying problem-based learning model and creative design to conic-sections teaching. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 7(3), 73-80. Retrieved from http://www.naun.org/main/NAUN/educationinformation/c012008-099.pdf
Fierro, R. D. (2013). Mathematics for elementary school teachers. Belmont: Brooks/Cole.
Haryanto, D. (2013). Penerapan model search, solve, create, and share dengan pendekatan problem posing untuk meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran dan komunikasi matematis siswa SMP. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/1864/
Irwan. (2001). Pengaruh pendekatan problem posing model search, solve, create and share (SSCS) dalam upaya meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematis mahasiswa matematika (suatu kajian eksperimen pada jurusan matematika FMIPA Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 11(1). Retrieved from http://jurnal.upi.edu/penelitian-pendidikan/view/1817/pengaruh-pendekatan-problem-posing-model-search,-solve,-create-and-share--sscs--dalam-upaya-meningkatkan-kemampuan-penalaran-matematis-mahasiswa-matematika--suatu-kajian-eksperimen-pada-jurusan-matemat
Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (1998). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Pearson Education International, 226-235. http://doi.org/10.1198/tech.2005.s319
Kirk, R. E. (2002). Experimental design : Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Waco, Texas: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/asi/experimental-design/book233742
Lia, K., & Bunga, F. (2014). Problem solving learning approach using search, solve, create and share (SSCS) model and the student's mathematical logical thinking skills. In Proceeding of International Conference On Research, Implementation And Education Of Mathematics And Sciences . Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Retrieved from http://eprints.uny.ac.id/11570/
Linn, R., Bond, L., carr, P., Darling-Hammond, L., Harris, D., Hess, F., & Shulman, L. (2009). Student learning student achievement: How do teachers measure up?. New York: National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Retrieved from http://www.nbpts.org/sites/default/files/documents/research/NBPTS_Student Learning Student Achievement (2).pdf
Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2005). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice. London: SAGE Publications.
Pazzini, E. L. (1991). SSCS problem solving: Implementation handbook. Iowa: Science Education Department, the University of Iowa.
Pazzini, E. L., Abell, S. K., & Shepardson, D. S. (1988). Rethinking thingking in the science classroom. In The Science Teacher (pp. 22-25). Retrieved from http://plato.acadiau.ca/courses/educ/GMacKinnon/Educ4143/graphics/Rethinking thinking.pdf
Rahmatudin, J. (2013). Penerapan model pembelajaran search, solve, create, and share untuk meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematis dan self concept siswa SMP Negeri 1 Kedawung. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/583/
Rencher, A. C. (1998). Multivariate statistical inference and applications. New York: Wiley.
Rosnawati, R. (2013). Kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa SMP Indonesia pada TIMSS 2011. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA (p. M-6). Yogyakarta: Fakultas MIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Retrieved from http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/132001808/penelitian/Makalah+Semnas+2013+an+R+Rosnawati+FMIPA+UNY.pdf
Santrock, J. (2010). Educational Psychology. Handbook of Educational Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.05.020154.002041
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. New Jersey: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Educational Psychology Theory and Practice- Pearson Etext Access Card. Pearson College Div.
Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. London: Routledge.
Suryadi, D. (2012). Membangun budaya baru dalam berpikir matematika. Bandung: Rizqi Press.
The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). NCTM principles and standards for school mathematics,. Association Drive, Reston, VA: Library of Congres Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/store/Products/NCTM-Principles-and-Standards-for-School-Mathematics,-Full-Edition-(PDF)/
Turmudi. (2009). Landasan filsafat dan teori pembelajaran matematika : Berparadigma eksploratif dan investigatif. Jakarta : Leuser Cita Pustaka.
Wijayanti, D. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran statistika dan peluang dengan metode penemuan terbimbing berorientasi kurikulum 2013 untuk siswa kelas X. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 23. http://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i1.6449
