Keywords
pengembangan, active knowledge sharing, saintifik
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran bercirikan Active Knowledge Sharing dengan pendekatan saintifik dalam upaya meningkatkan pengetahuan, kemampuanpemecahan masalah, dan sikap terhadap matematika siswa SMP Kelas VIII Semester 2 yang valid, praktis, dan efektif. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian pengembangan (Development Research). Penelitian ini mengembangkan perangkat pembelajaran yang meliputi: silabus; Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP); dan Lembar Kegiatan Siswa (LKS) dengan menggunakan model pengembangan 4-D yang dikembangkan oleh Thiagarajan, Semmel, dan Semmel. Hasil validasi menunjukkan perangkat yang dikembangkan layak digunakan dengan kategori sangat baik. Hasil uji coba menunjukkan bahwa perangkat yang dikembangkan praktis dan efektif. Ketuntasan belajar secara klasikal sudah mencapai kriteria minimal 80% yaitu untuk tes pengetahuan mencapai 97,2%, sedangkan tes pemecahan masalah mencapai 95,4%. Berdasarkan angket sikap terhadap matematika, 98,1% siswa menunjukkan peningkatan skor sikap terhadap matematika, dan 94,4% siswa menunjukkan sikap terhadap matematika dengan kategori minimal baik.
Kata Kunci: pengembangan, active knowledge sharing, saintifik
Developing the learning kit characterized by active knowledge sharing with scientific approach for grade VIII
Abstract
This research aimed to produce valid, practical, and effective learning kit characterized by Active Knowledge Sharing with Scientific Approach, as an effort to improve knowledge, problem-solving skills, and attitudes toward mathematics among Junior High School students in Class VIII Semester 2. This was a research and developmental study. The learning kit developed consist of: syllabus; lesson plans; and students worksheets. This developmental study refers to the model 4-D suggested by Thiangarajan, Semmel & Semmel. The results of the validation shows that the kit developed was valid with "very good" category. The experimental results show that the kit developed was practical and effective. Classical learning completeness reached at least 80% criterion for the test of knowledge 97.2%, while the troubleshooting tests reached 95.4%. Based on the questionnaire attitudes towards mathematics, 98.1% of students show increased scores for attitudes toward mathematics and 94.4% of students show attitudes towards mathematics with minimum category of good.
Keywords: developmental study, active knowledge sharing, scientific
Page Range
245-258
Issue
2
Volume
3
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jrpm.v3i2.10633
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/10633
Recommended Citation
Rusnilawati, R. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika bercirikan active knowledge sharing dengan pendekatan saintifik kelas VIII. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i2.10633
References
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing, a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
Atkin, M. J. & Paul, B. (2003). Ways of knowing in science and mathematics series. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Bechina, A. A. & Bommen, T. (2006). Knowledge sharing practices: Analysis of a global scandinavian consulting company. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2),109 - 116.
Booker, G., Bond, D., Sparrow, L., & Swan, P. (2004). Teaching primary mathematics (3rd Ed.). Sidney: Pearson Prentice Hall.
BSNP. (2011). Laporan hasil ujian nasional SMP/MTS tahun pelajaran 2010-2011. SMPN 1 Mijen Demak.
BSNP. (2012). laporan hasil ujian nasional SMP/MTS tahun pelajaran 2011-2012. SMPN 1 Mijen Demak.
BSNP. (2013). Laporan hasil ujian nasional SMP/MTS tahun pelajaran 2012/2013. SMPN 1 Mijen Demak.
Cápay, M., & Magdin, M. (2013). Tasks for teaching scientific approach using the black box method. Paper presented at the 64-XII. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1467836041?accountid=31324
Presiden. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19, Tahun 2005, tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Freeman, et al. (2013). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the Nation Academy of Sciences, 111 (23)
Gable, R. K. (1986). Instrument development in the affeective domain. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Gooding, J. T. C. (2009). Comparing the perceptions of scientific inquiry between experts and practitioners (Disertasi Doktor, Robert Morris University, 2009). Diambil pada tanggal 10 September 2014, dari http:// Journal of ProQuest.html.
Kawiyah, S. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika berbasis saintifik untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan prestasi belajar siswa. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 201-210. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v10i2.9163
Leder, G. (1992). Attitude to mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 4(3).
Majid, S. & Chitra P. K. (2013). Role of knowledge sharing in the learning process. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 2(1), 1201-1207.
Manoah, S. A., Indoshi, F. C., & Othuon, L. O. A. (2011) Influence of attitude on performance of students in mathematics curriculum. Educational Research, 2(3), 965-981.
Manoah, S. A., Indoshi, F. C., & Othuon, L. O. A. (2011). Influence of attitude on performance of students in mathematics curriculum. Educational Research, 2(3), 965-981. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267236551_Influence_of_attitude_on_performance_of_students_in_mathematics_curriculum
Mohamed, L. & Waheed, H. (2011). Secondary students' attitude towards mathematics in a selected school of Maldives. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(15), 277-281.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standars for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teacher of Mathemaics, Inc.
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. Dalam J. Van Den Akker, et al (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training. London, UK: Kluwer Academic Publisaher.
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Educational assesment of students. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Pimta, S, Tayruakham, S., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2009). Factors influencing mathematics problem-solving ability of sixth grade students. Journal of social sciences, 5(4), 381-385.
Rosetta, Z. & Pietro, D. M. (2007). Attitude toward mathematics: overcoming the positive/negative dichotomy. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, Monograph 3, pp.157-168.
Setiawan, R., & Harta, I. (2014). Pengaruh pendekatan open-ended dan pendekatan kontekstual terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan sikap siswa terhadap matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 241-257. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2679
Silberman, M. (2013). Pembelajaran aktif 101 strategi untuk mengajar secara aktif. (Terjemahan Sarjuli dkk) Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Buku asli terbit tahun 2001.
Shumway, R. J. (1980). Research in mathematics education. Reston, VA: National Council Teachers of Mathematics.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Blomington: may be ordered from the Council for Exceptional Children.
Widoyoko, E, P. (2009). Evaluasi program pembelajaran panduan praktis bagi pendidik dan calon pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Zain, S. F. H. S., Farah E. M. R., & Ismin I. Z. A. (2012). Student-centred learning in mathematics-constructivism in the classroom. Journal of International Education Research - Fourth Quarter 2012, 8(4), 319-328.
