•  
  •  
 

Keywords

pendekatan problem posing, pendekatan problem solving, sikap terhadap kalkulus, prestasi belajar

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving serta membandingkan keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dengan problem solving ditinjau dari sikap mahasiswa terhadap Kalkulus dan prestasi belajar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non equivalent comparison group design. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa Universitas Musamus Merauke. Sampel penelitian adalah mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika semester II yang dibagi dalam dua kelompok. Pengujian keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving menggunakan uji one sample t-test dan untuk mengetahui pendekatan mana yang lebih efektif menggunakan uji independent sample t-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) pendekatan problem posing efektif ditinjau dari sikap terhadap Kalkulus dan prestasi belajar; (2) pendekatan problem solving efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar; dan (3) pendekatan problem posing lebih efektif dari pada pendekatan problem solving ditinjau dari sikap mahasiswa terhadap Kalkulus.

Kata Kunci: pendekatan problem posing, pendekatan problem solving, sikap terhadap kalkulus, prestasi belajar

The effectiveness of problem posing and problem solving approach in calculus II learning

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the effectiveness of problem posing and problem solving approach, and to compare the effectiveness between problem posing and problem solving approach in terms of attitude toward Calculus and learning achievement. This study was a quasi-experimental study using the pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison group design. The population of this study were student of Musamus University. The sample in this study were 2nd semester students of mathematics educations departement who were divided into two groups. To assess the effectiveness of the problem posing and problem solving approach, the one sample t-test was carried out and to determine the more effective approach, independent sample t-test was used. The results of this study show that (1) the problem posing approach was effective in terms of attitude towards Calculus and learning achievement; (2) problem solving approach was effective in terms of learning achievement; and (3) problem posing approach was more effective than problem solving approach in terms of students attitude toward calculus.

Keywords: problem posing approach, problem solving approach, attitude toward Calculus, leraning achievement

Page Range

234-244

Issue

2

Volume

3

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jrpm.v3i2.9369

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/9369

References

Akay, H. & Boz, N. (2010). The effect of problem posing oriented analisis-II course on attitude toward mathematics and mathematics self-efficacy of elementary prospective mathematics teacher. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35 (1), 60-75.

Akinsola, M. K. & Olowojaiye, F. B., (2008). Teacher instructional methods and student attitudes towards mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3 (1), 61-73.

Amiluddin, R., & Sugiman, S. (2016). Pengaruh problem posing dan PBL terhadap prestasi belajar, dan motivasi belajar mahasiswa pendidikan matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 100-108. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i1.7303

Arikan, E. E. & Unal, H. (2015). An investigation of eighth grade students' problem posing skills (turkey sample). International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1 (1), 23-30.

Bell, F. H. (1978). Teaching and learning mathemathics (in secondary school). (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IO: Wn, C Brown Company Publisher.

Bonotto, C. & Dal Santo, L. (2015). On the relationship between problem posing, problem solving, and creative in the primary school. Dalam Cai, J. & Middleton, J. (Ed.). Mathematical Problem Posing from Research to Effective Practice. New York, NY: Springer.

Clements, P. & Jones, J. (2008). The adversity trining handbook: a practical guide to understanding & changing attitudes. London, UK: Kogan Page.

Douglas, A. G. (1992). Handbook of research on matemathics teaching learning. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Effandi, Z. & Norulbiah, N. (2011). A preliminary analysis of students' problem posing ability and its relationship to attitudes towards problem solving. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 3 (9), 866-870.

Ghasempour, Z., Bakar, N., & Jahanshahloo, G.R. (2013). Innovation in teaching and learning through problem posing task and metacognitive strategies. International Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 1 (1), 53-62.

Haylock, D. & Thangata, F. (2007). Key concepts in teaching primary mathematics. London, UK: SAGE Publication Ltd.

Isnawan, M. G. (2014). Perbandingan keefektifan pendekatan problem solving dengan problem posing pada pembelajaran logika ditinjau dari aspek prestasi belajar matematika, kemampuan metakognitif, dan sikap siswa terhadap proses pembelajaran matematika di SMA. (studi eksperimen pada siswa kelas X SMA negeri 1 Lingsar). Tesis, tidak dipublikasikan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2014). Buku kurikulum pendidikan tinggi. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Killen, R. (2009). Effective teaching strategies: lessons from research and practice (5th ed.). South Melbourne: Cengange Learning.

Lianghuo, F., Seng, Q. K., Yan, Z., Mei, Y. S., Pereira-Mendoza, L., & Yee, L. P. 2005. Assessing singapore students' attitudes toward mathematics and mathematics learning: findings from a survey of lower secondary students. Diakses 12 Agustus 2015 dari https://repository.nie.edu.Sg../CRP24_03FLHConf05(EARCOME)

Lovat, T. (2010). The new values education: a pedagogical imperative for student wellbeing. Dalam Lovat, T., Toomey, R., & Clement, N. (Ed.). International Research Handbook of Values Education and Student Wellbeing. New York, NY: Springer. Hal 3-18.

Montague, M. (2005). Math problem solving for primary elementary sudents with disabilities. Diakses pada tanggal 15 agustus 2015 dari http://165.139.150.129/intervention/Math%20Problem%20Solving%20for%20Primary%20Elementary%20Students%20with%20Disabilties.pdf Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.

Syah, M. (2013). Psikologi pendidikan: suatu pendekatan baru. Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Narmadha, U. & Chamundeswari, S. (2013). Attitude towards learning of science and academic achievement in science among students at the secondary level. Journal of Sociological Research, 4 (2), 114-124.

Popham, R. J. (1995). Classroom assesment: what teacher need to know. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Republik Indonesia. (2012). Undang-undang RI nomor 12, tahun 2012, tentang pendidikan tinggi.

Sardin, S. (2015). Perbandingan keefektifan pembelajaran guided inquiry dan problem solving ditinjau dari prestasi belajar peluang, kemampuan penalaran, dan sikap siswa terhadap matematika. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 189-200. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v10i2.9158

Stevens, J. P (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.) New York, NY: Routlege Taylor & Francis Group.

Siswono, T. Y. E. (2008). Identifikasi proses berpikir kreatif siswa dalam pengajuan masalah (problem posing) matematika berpandu dengan model wallas dan creative problem solving (CPS). Buletin Pendidikan Matematika, 6 (2), 1-16.

Tatsuoka, M. M. (1971). Multivariate analysis: techniques for educational andpsychological research. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Van de walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2013). Elementary and middle shool mathematics: teaching developmentally (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Wijayanti, T., & Sugiman, S. (2013). Keefektifan pendekatan CTL dan problem solving ditinjau dari prestasi belajar matematika dan religiusitas siswa. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 213-223. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v8i2.8951

Download

Share

COinS