Keywords
realistik, kooperatif, RESIK
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan model pembelajaran Realistik dalam Seting Kooperatif (RESIK) ditinjau dari sikap terhadap matematika, motivasi belajar matematika, dan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa SMP. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan pretest-postest non equivalent group design. Penelitian ini menggunakan satu kelompok eksperimen dan satu kelompok kontrol. Populasi penelitian mencakup seluruh siswa kelas VII SMPN 1 Selong, Kabupaten Lombok Timur, NTB yang terdiri dari 6 kelas. Untuk menguji keefektifan model pembelajaran RESIK dan model konvensional ditinjau dari masing-masing aspek yaitu sikap terhadap matematika, motivasi belajar matematika, dan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis digunakan analisis one sample t-test pada taraf signifikansi 5%. Selanjutnya untuk membandingkan keefektifan model pembelajaran RESIK dan model konvensional ditinjau dari aspek sikap terhadap matematika, motivasi belajar matematika, dan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis data dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji T2 Hotteling dengan taraf signifikansi 5%, dan uji-t univariat untuk menentukan model manakah yang lebih efektif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan model pembelajaran RESIK efektif ditinjau dari sikap terhadap matematika, motivasi belajar matematika, dan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa. Model pembelajaran RESIK lebih efektif daripada model konvensional ditinjau dari sikap terhadap matematika, motivasi belajar matematika, dan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis.
Kata Kunci: realistik, kooperatif, RESIK
The effectiveness of the realistic model in cooperative setting in terms of the attitude, motivation, and mathematical critical thinking skill of junior high school students
Abstract
This research aimed to describe the effectiveness of the realistic model in cooperative setting (RESIK model) in terms of the attitude, motivation, and mathematical critical thinking skill of junior high school students. This research was a quasi experimental study using pretest-posttest non equivalent group design. In this study, two experimental groups were used. Population of research covered the whole number of six classes of grade VII student of SMPN 1 Selong, Lombok Timur, NTB. There were three different tests used to examine the data. One sample t-test at a significance level of 5% was used to examine the effectiveness of learning using RESIK model and conventional approach in terms of the aspect of students' attitude toward mathematics, mathematics learning motivation, and mathematical critical thinking skill. Then the data was analyzed using T2 Hotteling test at significance level of 5% to compare the effectiveness of RESIK model and conventional approach, and the last test was by using t-univariat test to determine which approach was more effective. The result indicates that both RESIK model and conventional approach in learning mathematics were effective in terms of the aspect of students' attitude toward mathematics, mathematics learning motivation, and mathematical critical thinking skill at grade VII of SMPN 1 Selong. RESIK model more effective than conventional model in terms of the aspect of students' attitude toward mathematics, mathematics learning motivation, and mathematical critical thinking skill. Keywords: realistic, cooperative, RESIK
Page Range
137-149
Issue
2
Volume
3
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jrpm.v3i2.7994
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/7994
Recommended Citation
Abdurahim, A. (2016). Keefektifan model pembelajaran resik ditinjau dari sikap, motivasi, dan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i2.7994
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing (Rev. ed.) New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
Aizikovitsh-Udi, E., & Cheng, D. (2015). Developing critical thinking skills from dispositions to abilities: mathematics education from early childhood to high school. Creative Education, 6(1), 455-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.64045
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach.(9 th ed.) New York, NY: McGrow- Hill
Armanto, D. (2002). Teaching multiplication and division realistically in Indonesia primary school. A prototype of local instructional theory. Dissertasi, Enshede: Print Partners Ipskamp.
Azwar, S. (2007). Sikap manusia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar.
Brodie, K (2010). Teaching mathematical reasoning in secondary school classrooms. New York, NY: Springer.
Chambers, P. (2008). Teaching mathematics developing as a reflective secondary teacher. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
CORD. (1999) Teaching mathematics contextually. Waco, TX: CORD Communications, Inc.
Chrissanti, M., & Widjajanti, D. (2015). Keefektifan pendekatan metakognitif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan minat belajar matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 51 - 62. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i1.7150
Depdiknas (2006). Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 22 Tahun 2006, tentang Standar Isi.
Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1986). Essentials of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Fauzan, A. (2002). Applying realistic mathematics education (RME) in teaching geometri in Indonesia Primary School. Enchede: Print Partners Ipskamp.
Fisher, A. (2009). Berpikir kritis. (terjemahan Benyamin Hadinata). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (buku asli diterbitkan tahun 2007).
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gable, R. K. (1986). Instrument development in the affective domain. Lancaster: Kluwer-Nijhoffshing.
Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2010). Realistic mathematics education theory as a guideline for problem-centred, inter-active mathematics education. Dalam Sembiring, R. & Hoogland, K. & Dolk, M. (2010) A Decade of PMRI in Indonesia. Bandung.
Hadi, S. (2005). Pendidikan matematika realistik dan implementasinya. Banjarmasin: Tulip.
Hough, S., & Gough, S. (2007). Realistic Mathematics Education. Mathematics Teaching Incorporating Micromath, 203, 34-38.
Huberty, J. C., & Olejnik, S. (2006). Applied MANOVA and discriminant analysis. Athens. Wiley-interscince.
Isjoni (2011). Pembelajaran kooperatif meningkatkan kecerdasan komunikasi antar peserta didik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ivie, S. S. (1998). Ausubel's learning theory: An approach to teaching higher order thingking skills. The High School Journal, 82(1), 35-42.
Joyce, B. & Weil, M. (1996). Models of teaching. London, UK: Allyn & Bacon.
Kulm, G. (1980). Research on mathematical attitude. Dalam Shumway R. J., (1982) Research in mathematics education. Reston, VA: National Council Theachers of Mathematics.
McLean, A. (2009). Motivating every learner. Washington, DC: PAGE Publication Inc.
Muijs, D. & Reynolds, D. (2011). Effective teaching. London, UK: SAGE Publication.
Nugraha, T., & Mahmudi, A. (2015). Keefektifan pembelajaran berbasis masalah dan problem posing ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir logis dan kritis. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 107 - 120. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i1.7154
Sanjaya, W. (2011). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.
Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperatif learning. (terjemahan Zubaedi). Bandung: Misan Nusa Media. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 2005).
Sopia, H., & Wutsqa, D. (2015). Keefektifan pendekatan realistik ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan pemecahan masalah, dan kepercayaan diri matematika. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 146-154. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v10i2.9139
Trianto (2009). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif-progresif. Konsep, landasan, dan implementasinya pada kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (1996). Mathematics education in the Netherlands: A guide tour. Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University.
Wijaya, A. (2012). Pendidikan matematika realistik, suatu alternatif pendekatan pembelajaran matematika. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Zaini, A., & Marsigit, M. (2014). Perbandingan keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan matematika realistik dan konvensional ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran dan komunikasi matematik siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 152-163. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2672
