Keywords
problem solving, guided inquiry, team assisted individualization, prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, kedisiplinan diri
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan dan membandingkan keefektifan problem solving setting team assisted individualization (TAI) dengan guided inquirysetting TAI ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kedisiplinan diri siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Lebaksiu yang terdiri atas 9 kelas. Dari populasi yang ada diambil secara acak dua kelas, yaitu kelas VII H dan kelas VII I sebagai sampel kelas penelitian. Kelas VII H diberi treatment dengan pendekatan pembelajaran problem solving setting TAI, sedangkan kelas VII I dengan guided inquiry setting TAI. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji one sample t-test, uji MANOVA dengan T2 Hotteling's dilanjutkan dengan uji t-Benferroni untuk menentukan pendekatan pembelajaran mana yang lebih efektif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan pembelajaran problem solving setting TAI dan guided inquiry setting TAI keduanya efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kedisiplinan diri; pendekatan pembelajaran guided inquiry setting TAIlebih efektif daripada problem solving setting TAI ditinjau dari masing-masing aspek.
Kata Kunci: problem solving, guided inquiry, team assisted individualization, prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, kedisiplinan diri
The effectiveness of problem solving and guided inquiry viewed from students' learning achievement, critical thinking skills, and self-discipline
Abstract
This study aims to describe the effectiveness and compare the effectiveness of problem solving in team assisted individualization (TAI) setting with guided inquiry in TAI setting viewed from the students' learning achievement, critical thinking skills, and self-discipline. The research population comprised all Class VII students, consisting of 9 classes of SMP Negeri 1 Lebaksiu. From the population, two groups (classes), class VII H and class VII I, were selected randomly as the research class sample. Class VII H was treated with the approach of learning problem solving in TAI setting, while class VII I was treated with the guided inquiry in TAI setting. The data were analyzed using one sample t-test, MANOVA with T2 Hotteling's and then continued by t-Benferroni test to determine which the approach of learning is more effective. The results of study show that the approaches of learning problem solving in TAI setting and guided inquiry in TAI setting are both effective viewed from students' learning achievement, critical thinking skills, and self-discipline, and the approach of learning guided inquiry in TAI setting is more effective than problem solving in TAI setting in terms of each aspect.
Keywords: problem solving, guided inquiry, team assisted individualization, learning achievement, critical thinking skills, self-discipline
Page Range
221-233
Issue
2
Volume
3
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jrpm.v3i2.6143
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/6143
Recommended Citation
Setianingsih, H. (2016). Keefektifan problem solving dan guided inquiry dalam setting TAI ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kedisiplinan diri. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i2.6143
References
Azwar, S. (2013).Tes prestasi: Fungsi dan pengukuran prestasi belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
BNSP.(2010). Paradigma pendidikan nasional abad XXI. Jakarta: Badan Nasional Standar Pendidikan.
Bell, F. H (1978).Teaching and learning mathematics (in secondary schools) Dubuque, Lowa: William C. Brown CO.
Bilgin, I. (2009). The effects of guided inquiry instruction incorporating a cooperative learning approach on university students' achievement of acid and bases concepts and attitude toward guided inquiry instruction [Versi electronik]. Journal of Scientific Research and Essay. 4(10), 1038-1046
Brownlie, F., et al. (2003). Enhanching learning: Report of the student achievement task force. British Columbia. Diambil pada tanggal 13 Agustus 2014, dari http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/taskforce/achieve_task_rep.pdf.
Dehyadegary, E., et al. (2012). Academic engagement as a mediator in relationships between emotional intelligence and academic achievement among adolescents in kerman-iran [Versi electronik].Journal of American Science, 8, 9, 823-832.
Gok & Silay. (2010). The effects of problem solving strategies on students' achievement, attitude and motivation [Versi electronik]. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, l 4, 7-21.
Gordon, T. (1996).Mengajar anak berdisiplin diri di rumah dan di sekolah.(Terjemahan S. Suprayitna & Amitya Kumara). Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. (Buku asli diterbitkan 1989)
Happy, N., & Widjajanti, D. (2014). Keefektifan PBL ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif matematis, serta self-esteem siswa SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 48-57. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i1.2663
Haryani, D. (2012). Profil proses berpikir kritis siswa SMA dengan gaya kognitif field independen dan berjenis kelamin laki-laki dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. Prosiding SNMPM Universitas Sebelas Maret, 145-163.Haylock, D. & Thangata, F. (2007).Keyconcept in teaching primary mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication.
Herman, T. (2007). Pembelajaran berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa SMP. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXVI, 1, 41-62.
Jalal, A. (2012). Keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan pemecahan masalah model Polya ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran, berpikir kritis, dan berpikir kreatif matematis pada siswa SMA N 5 Kota Ternate. Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.
Mustamil, H. (2012). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran multilevel dengan pendekatan problem solving untuk meningkatkan sikap dan prestasi belajar matematika siswa SMP pada materi lingkaran. Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.
Johnson, K.L (2003). Willpower: The secrets of self-discipline. California: Louis & Ford Publishing.
Junaidi. (2012). Perbandingan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan open ended dan problem solving ditinjau dari sikap siswa terhadap proses pembelajaran matematika dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika di kelas X SMAN 1 Pringgarata Lombok Tengah tahun ajaran 2011/2012. Tesis Magister, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.
Kemendiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 23 Tahun 2006, tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan.
Kirk, R.E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Kuhlthau, C.C., Maniotes, L.K., & Caspari, A.K. (2007).Guided inquiry: learning in the 21st century. London: Libraries Unlimited.
Lovat, T., et al. (2011). Value pedagogy and student achievement: Contemporary research evidence. London: Springer Science+Business Media.
Markaban.(2006). Model penemuan terbimbing pada pembelajaran matematika SMK [Versi elektronik]. Yogyakarta: P4TK, Dinas Pendidikan Nasional.
Mayadiana, D. (2005). Pembelajaran dengan pendekatan diskursif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematik mahasiswa calon guru sekolah dasar. Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
McElmeel, S. L. (2002). Character education: A book guide for teachers, librarians, and parents. Greenwood village: Librries unlimited.
McKinley, J. (2010). Raising black students' achievement through culturally responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Muijs, D. & Reinold, D. (2005). Effective teaching: Evidence practice (2nded.). London, UK: SAGE Publications.
Muslimin, Z.I. (2012). Prestasi belajar mahasiswa ditinjau dari jalur penerimaan mahasiswa baru, asal sekolah, dan skor tes potensi akademik. Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 3, 1, 381-393.
Polya, G. (1985). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton: Princenton University Press.
Priatna, N. (2003). Kemampuan penalaran dan pemahaman matematika siswa kelas III SLTP di Kota Bandung. Disertasi, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Republik Indonesia.(2003). Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20, Tahun 2003, tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Rudinow, J. & Barry, V.E. (2011). Invitation to critical thinking. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
Savage, T.V., & Savage, M.K. (2010). Successful classroom management and discipline: Teaching self control and responsibility. Thousand Oaks, CA. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Slavin, R.E. (2006). Educational psychologi: Theory, research, and practice. (8thed). London: Pearson Education, Inc.
Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
TIMSS & PRILS. (2012). TIMSS 2011: International results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Trilling, B & Fadel, C. (2009).21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.
Trowbridge, L.W. & Bybee, R. W. (1986).Becoming a secondary school science teacher (4thed.). Colombus, Ohio: Merrill Publishing Company.
Wray, D. (2010). Looking at learning. Dalam J. Arthur & T. Cremin (Eds.), Learning to teach in the primary school (2nded.) (pp.41-52). Madison Ave, NY: Routledge
