Keywords
pengembangan, perangkat pembelajaran matematika, problem-based learning, higher order thinking skills
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran matematika bercirikan problem-based learning (PBL) yang valid, praktis, dan efektif untuk mengembangkan higher order thinking skills (HOTS) siswa SMA kelas X semester 2 berupa: rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran (RPP) dan lembar kegiatan siswa (LKS) yang dilengkapi instrumen tes hasil belajar. Penelitian pengembangan ini menggunakan model pengembangan 4-D dari Thiagarajan dengan empat tahapan, yaitu: pendefinisian, perancangan, pengembangan, dan penyebaran. Uji coba dilaksanakan dalam tiga tahap, yaitu: uji coba ahli, uji coba terbatas, dan uji coba lapangan. Subjek uji coba dalam penelitian ini adalah guru dan siswa yang dipilih dari dua sekolah. Instrumen yang digunakan terdiri atas lembar validasi, penilaian guru, penilaian siswa, dan instrumen tes hasil belajar. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perangkat yang dikembangkan telah memenuhi aspek validitas, kepraktisan, dan keefektifan.(1) Hasil validitas menunjukkan bahwa RPP dan LKS yang dikembangkan pada kategori valid dengan indeks Aiken pada RPP sebesar 0,69 dan LKS sebesar 0,70. (2) Hasil uji coba terbatas menunjukkan perangkat pembelajaran yang dikembangkan pada kategori praktis. (3) Hasil uji coba lapangan menunjukkan perangkat pembelajaran efektif ditinjau dari HOTS siswa dengan persentase ketuntasan secara klasikal subjek uji coba lebih dari 75%.
Kata Kunci: pengembangan, perangkat pembelajaran matematika, problem-based learning, higher order thinking skills
Mathematics teaching kits based on PBL to develop hots of senior high school students
Abstract
This research is aimed at developing mathematics teaching kit based on problem-based learning which is valid, practical, and effective to develop the higher order thinking of grade X students senior high school in their second semester, which consists of lesson plan and students' worksheet with test instrument. The research development used the model adapted from 4-D model developed by Thiagarajan with employing steps: defining, planning, developing, and disseminating. The tryout is conducted three steps: expert validation, limited tryout, and field tryout. The tryout subjects were teachers and students from two schools. The instruments used in this research were validation sheet, teacher's assessment sheet, student's assessment sheet, and test. The result of the research shows that the developed mathematics teaching kitbased on problem-based learning has met the aspect of validity, practicality, and effectiveness. (1) The result of validation shows that the lesson plan and the students' worksheet are chategorized as valid with the Aiken analysis showing the index for the lesson plan has achieved 0.69 and the 0.70 for the students' worksheet. (2) teh result of limited tryout shows that the developed of mathematics teaching kit is practical. (3) the result of field tryout shows that the developed of mathematics teaching is effective interm students's HOTS with percentage of clasisical mastery subjects reached 75%.
Keywords: development, mathematics teaching kit, problem-based learning, higher order thinking skills
Page Range
189-197
Issue
2
Volume
3
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jrpm.v3i2.10631
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/10631
Recommended Citation
Susanto, E., & Retnawati, H. (2016). Perangkat pembelajaran matematika bercirikan PBL untuk mengembangkan HOTS siswa SMA. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i2.10631
References
Ajai, J.T., Imoko, B.I., & O'kwu. E.I. (2013). Comparison of the learning effectiveness of problem-based learning (pbl) and conventional method of teaching algebra. Journal of Education and Practice, 1 (4), 131-135
Baden, M.S. (2007). A practical guide to problem-based learning online. New York: Maggi Savin-Baden.
Barrett, T. (2010). The problem-based learning process as finding and being in flow.Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47 (2), 165-174.
Brookhart, S.M. (2010). How to assess higher order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria: ASCD
Cheong, F. (2008).Using a problem-based learning approach to teach an intelligent systems course. Journal of Information Technology Education, 7, 47-60.
Conklin, W. (2012). Higher order thinking skills to develop 21st century learners. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education Publishing,Inc
Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2012). Strategi dan model pembelajaran mengajar konten dan keterampilan berpikir. (Terjemahan Satrio Wahono). Boston: Pearson Educational, Inc. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 2012)
Sastrawati, E., Rusdi, M., & Syamsurizal. (2011). Problem-based learning, strategi metakognisi, dan keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa, Tekno-Pedagogi, 1 (2), 1-14,
Fatade, A.O., Mogari, D., & Arigbabu, A.A. (2013). Effect of problem-based learning on senior secondary school students' achievements infurther mathematics. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 3 (6), 27-43
Farhan, M., & Retnawati, H. (2014). Keefektifan PBL dan IBL ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan representasi matematis, dan motivasi belajar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 227-240. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2678
Fogarty, R. (1997). Problem based learning & kurikulum models for the multipleintelligences classroom. Glenview: Pearson SkyLight
Jeong, H., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25 (1), 101-116.
Retnawati, H. (2014). Membuktikan validitas instrumen dalam pengukuran. Diambil pada tanggal 2 Juni 2015 di:http://www.evaluation-edu.com
Kemendikbud.(2013).Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 65, Tahun 2013, tentang Standar Proses
Kemendikbud.(2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 59, Tahun 2013, tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah
Miri, B., David, B.C., & Uri, Z. (2007) Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37, 353-369
Moon, B., Mayes, A.S., & Hutchinson, S. (2002). Teaching, learning and the curriculum in secondary school. New York: RoutledeFalmer
Mullis, et al. (2011). Trends in international mathematics and science study. (2011). TIMSS 2011 internationalresults in mathematics. Boston: Iternational Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement
Murray, E., C. (2011). Implementing higher-order thinking in middle school mathematics classrooms. Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia,Georgia. Tersedia di https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/murray_eileen_c_201105_phd.pdf
Nieveen, N. (1999). Design approaches and tools in education and training. Dordrecht: ICO Cluwer academic publisher
Posamentier, A.S., Jaye, D., & Krulik, S. (2007). Exemplary practices for secondary math teacher. Alexandria: ASCD
Protheroe, N. (2007). What does good math instruction look like?. Principal, 7,51-54
Setiawan, T., Sugianto, & Junaedi, I. (2012). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan problem based learning untuk meningkatkan keterampilan higher order thinking. Unnes Journal of Research Mathematics Education, 1 (1), 73-80
Wardhani, S.,& Rumiati. (2011). Instrumen penilaian hasil belajar matematika SMP: Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Matematika, Yogyakarta: P4TK
Tan, O., S. (2004).Enhancing thingking through problem-based learning approaches: international perspectives. Shenton Way, SG: Cengage Learning
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, M.I. (1974). Intructional development for training teacher of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Reston: Association Drive
Widoyoko, E., P. (2009). Evaluasi program pembelajaran panduan praktis bagi pendidik dan calon pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.