Keywords
pendekatan open-ended, pendekatan problem solving, kemampuan penalaran, kemampuan pemecahan masalah, kemampuan komunikasi matematis
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan keefektifan dan perbandingan keefektifan dari pendekatan open-ended dan problem solving pada pembelajaran bangun ruang sisi datar ditinjau dari pencapaian kemampuan penalaran, pemecahan masalah, dan komunikasi matematis. Penelitian ini adalah quasi experiment dengan desain pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. Populasi penelitian mencakup seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Pandak, Bantul, Yogyakarta. Selanjutnya dengan memilih secara acak dari keseluruhan kelas tersebut, terpilih kelas VIII F dan VIII G sebagai sampel penelitian. Untuk menguji keefektifan masing-masing pendekatan pembelajaran digunakan uji one sample t-test. Untuk menguji bahwa pendekatan open-ended lebih efektif daripada pendekatan problem solving, data dianalisis menggunakan MANOVA yang dilanjutkan dengan uji t-Bonferroni. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kedua pendekatan pembelajaran efektif ditinjau dari masing-masing aspek, dan pendekatan open-ended lebih efektif daripada pendekatan problem solving pada pembelajaran bangun ruang sisi datar ditinjau dari pencapaian kemampuan penalaran, pemecahan masalah, dan komunikasi matematis di SMP.
Kata Kunci: pendekatan open-ended, pendekatan problem solving, kemampuan penalaran, kemampuan pemecahan masalah, kemampuan komunikasi matematis
The Effectiveness of Open-Ended and Problem Solving Approach in Matter of Flat Side Construct in Junior High School
Abstract
The aims of this research are to decide the effectiveness and the comparison of the effectiveness of open-ended and problem solving approach toward matter of flat side construct lesson viewed from achivement of reasoning ability, problem solving and mathematics communication. This study was a quasi experimental study using the pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. The research population covered the entire VIII class students' of SMP Negeri 1 Pandak, Bantul, Yogyakarta. From the population, classes of VIII F and VIII G were selected randomly as the research sample. To test the effectiveness of open-ended and problem solving approach, the one sample t-test was carried out. Then, to test the more effectiveness of the open-ended approach than the problem solving approach, the MANOVA was carried out and then continued by the t-Bonferroni test. The results of the study show that open-ended and problem solving approaches are effective and open-ended approach is more effective than problem solving approach in matter of flat side construct' viewed from achivement of reasoning ability, problem solving, and mathematics communication in junior high school. Keywords: the open-ended approach, the problem solving approach, reasoning ability, problem solv-ing ability, mathematics communication ability
Page Range
211 - 223
Issue
2
Volume
2
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jrpm.v2i2.7335
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/7335
Recommended Citation
Melianingsih, N., & Sugiman, S. (2015). Keefektifan pendekatan open-ended dan problem solving pada pembelajaran bangun ruang sisi datar di SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i2.7335
References
Al-Absi, Muhammad. (2012). The effect of open-ended tasks-as an assessment tool-on fourth graders' mathematics achievement, and assessing students' perspectives about it. Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences Vol. 9 No. 3, pp 345-351.
Capcaro, M. M., Robert M. C., & Victor V. Cifarelli. (2007). What are students thinking as they solve open-ended mathematics problems?. Presented at the annual conference of School Science and Mathematics, Missoula, MT.
CBS (Capacity Building Series). (2010). Communication in the mathematics classroom. Diambil tanggal 08 Juli 2013, dari http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/research/CBS_Communication_Mathematics.pdf.
Haylock, D. (2010). Mathematics explained for primary teachers. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication.
Haylock, D., & Thangata, F. (2007). Key concepts in teaching primary mathematics. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication.
Inprasitha, M. (2006). Open-ended Approach and Teacher Education. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematic. Vol. 25, pp 169-177.
Junaidi. (2012). Perbandingan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan open ended dan problem solving ditinjau dari sikap siswa terhadap proses pembelajaran matematika dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika di kelas X SMAN 1 pringgarata lombok tengah tahun ajaran 2011/2012. Tesis Magister, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.
Kemendiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 22, Tahun 2006, tentang Standar Isi.
Kemendiknas. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 64, Tahun 2013, tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Kirkley, J. (2003). Principles for teaching problem solving. The Technical Paper, No. 4, 1-14. Plato learning.
Mahmudi, A. (2009). Komunikasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Makalah termuat pada Jurnal MIPMIPA UNHALU Volume 8, Nomor 1.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. United States: National Council of Teachers of mathematics, Inc.
Orlich, D. C. (2004). Teaching strategies: a guide to effective instruction. Belmount, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
O'Shea, J. (2010). Teaching mathematical problem solving in the primary school. Resource & Research Guides Vol. 2 No. 5. Limerick: National centre for excellence in mathematics and science and learning.
Posamentier, A. S., Smith, B. S., & Stepelman, J. (2010). Teaching secondary mathematics techniques and enrichment units (eight ed). Boston, MA: Perason Education, Inc.
Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20, Tahun 2003, tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Sawada, T. (1997). Developing lesson plans. Dalam J. P. Becker dan S. Shimada (ed). The Open-ended Approach: A New Proposal for Teaching Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Schwanke, B. (2008). Reasoning and Proof (RAP) Journals: I Am Here. Action Research Project Report. Lincoln: Department of Mathematics University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Shimada, S., & Becker, J. (1997). The Significance of an open-ended approach. Dalam J. P. Becker dan S. Shimada (ed) The Open-ended Approach: A New Proposal for Teaching Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Stevens, J. (2009). Applied multivariat statistic for the social sciences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.
Tatsuoka, M. M. (1971). Multivariate analysis: Techniques for educational and psychological research. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Zahman, A. (2012). Keefektifan Pendekatan Kontekstual dan Pendekatan Pemecahan Masalah pada Pembelajaran Matematika pada Pembelajaran Matematika ditinjau dari Pencapaian Kompetensi Dasar, Kemampuan Penalaran, dan Komunikasi Matematika. Tesis, Yogyakarta: Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
