Keywords
education, culture, George S. Counts, Ki Hajar Dewantara, competency of students, the 21st century
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkontekstualisasikan pemikiran dua tokoh di abad 19 tentang pendidikan dan kebudayaan serta menemukan relevansi pemikiran tersebut dengan kompetensi peserta didik di abad 21. Penelitian ini merupakan kajian studi pustaka dengan menggunakan pendekatan analisis isi. Data berupa sumber primer dan sekunder. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan teknik library research. Data dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan pendekatan induktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konsep pemikiran kedua tokoh saling berkaitan khususnya tentang empat poin pokok, yaitu tujuan pendidikan, fungsi pendidikan, proses pendidikan, dan peran pendidik. Konsep pemikiran tersebut masih relevan jika dikontekstualisasikan dengan kompetensi peserta didik di abad 21. Abad 21 menghendaki peserta didik memiliki keterampilan berpikir kritis, pemecahan masalah, dan kolaborasi. Tujuan pendidikan dipandang sebagai cara mengekspresikan peradaban yang dilayani dan mengusahakan kebudayaan yang berazas keadaban. Peradaban yang akan dilayani peserta didik di abad 21 adalah perpaduan pengetahuan, pemikiran, keterampilan inovasi, media, literasi Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (ICT), dan pengalaman kehidupan nyata. Untuk itu diperlukan peran optimal pendidik dalam memvariasikan proses pembelajaran dengan menggunakan berbagai metode sehingga pendidikan dapat menjalankan fungsinya untuk mengatasi krisis sosial dan ketertinggalan budaya, sehingga mampu mempertinggi derajat kemanusiaan. Pendidikan juga harus selalu mewariskan kebudayaan dalam setiap prosesnya agar peserta didik memiliki keluhuran budi.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This research aims to contextualize the thoughts of two figures in the 19th century about education and culture, and to find out the relevance of that thought to the competence of students in the 21st century. This research conducted a literature study using the content analysis approach. Data in the form of primary and secondary sources. Data collection is done by library research techniques. Data are analyzed qualitatively with an inductive approach. The research results show that the concepts of thought of the two figures are interrelated especially about the four main points, namely the purpose of education, the function of education, the educational process, and the role of educators. The concept of thought is still relevant if contextualized with the competence of students in the 21st century. The 21st century requires students to have critical thinking skills, problem solving, and collaboration. The purpose of education is seen as a way of expressing the civilization served and cultivating a culture based on civilization. The civilization that will be served by students in the 21st century is a blend of knowledge, thought, innovation skills, media, information and communication technology literacy (ICT), and real life experiences. For this reason, the optimal role of educators is needed in varying the learning process by using various methods so that education can carry out its functions to overcome social crises and cultural backwardness, so as to enhance humanity. Education also must always transmit the culture in every process so that students have nobility.
First Page
175
Last Page
186
Page Range
175-186
Issue
2
Volume
16
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jc.v16i2.22045
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/civics/article/view/22045
Recommended Citation
Kawuryan, S. P. (2019). Relevansi konsep pemikiran pendidikan dan kebudayaan George S. Counts dan Ki Hajar Dewantara dengan kompetensi peserta didik abad 21. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 16(2), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v16i2.22045
References
Abao, E., Dayagbil, F. & Boholano, H. (2015). Engagement to Social Networking: Challenges and Opportunities to Educators. European Scientific Journal.11(16), 173"191.
Boholano, H. (2013). ICT Based Instruction in a Constructivist Classroom. Int. J. Comp. Educ. Dev., Aug. 2013, Vol. 15, No. 2, 124"136.
Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A Systematic Literature Review of 21st Century Skills and Competencies in Primary Education. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1131a
Commision on Education for the Twenty-First Century. Paris: UNESCO.
Delors, J. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the International
Dewantara, K. H. (2011). Bagian pertama: pendidikan (Cetakan Ke). Yogyakarta: Majelis Luhur Persatuan Tamansiswa.
Drew, Sally Valentino (2013). Open up the ceiling on the common core state standards: preparing students for 21st-century literacy"”now. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 56(4), 321-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.00145
Gutek, G. L. (1974). Philosophical Alternatives in Education. Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., & Hopkins, D. (2009). Second internationa lhandbook of educational change, Dordrecht : Imprint: Springer.
Heinrichs, C. R. (2016). Exploring the influence of 21st century skills in a dual languageprogram: A case study. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 7(1), 3756. Retrieved from https://www.cpp.edu/~ceis/education/international-journalteacher-leadership/index.shtml
Joyce, Bruce, Marcia Weil, Emily Calhoun. (2009). Models of teaching. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Kumalasari, D. (2015). Konsep pemikiran Ki Hadjar Dewantara dalam pendidikan taman siswa (tinjauan humanis-religius). Istoria, 8(1).
Levy, F., & Murnane, R. (2005). How computerized work and globalization shape human skill demand, IPC Working Paper series MIT-IPC-05-006, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause Learning Initiative, 23(1), 240-241.
McCoog, I.J. (2008). 21st Century teaching and learning. Education Resource Center. Retrieved from eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED502607.pdf
National Council of Teachers of English. (2008). The NCTE definition of 21st century literacies. Retrieved from http://www2.ncte.org/statement/21stcentdefinition/
Paige, J. (2009). The 21st century skills movement. Educational Leadership, 9(67). 11-11.
Robinson, K. (2007, January 7). Do Schools kill creativity? Sir Ken Robinson. Ted Talks [video file] Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG9CE55wbtY Robinson
Senge, P. M. (2009). Education for an interdependent world: developing systems citizens. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fulan, D. Hopkins (Eds.). Second international handbook of educational change (131-152). Dordrecht : Imprint: Springer.
Shute, V. J., & Becker, B. J. (2010). Innovative assessment for the 21st century. New York. NY: SpringerVerlag.
Stewart, V. (2010). A classroom as wide as the world. In Curriculum 21: Essential Education for a Changing World. ed. H. Hayes Jacobs. 97-114. Alexandria. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Velez, A. (2012). Preparing students for the future- 21st Century Skills. Unpublished dissertation, University of Southern California.
West Virginia Department of Education (2009). Closing the achievement gap report for 21st century learners in West Virginia. Third Edition, 2009-2010. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED508066.pdf
Wilmarth, S. 2010. Five socio-technology trends that change everything in learning and teaching. In Curriculum 21: Essential education for a changing world. ed. Heidi Hayes Jacobs. 80-96. Alexandria. VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Zaidieh, A.J. (2012). The Use of Social Networking in Education: Challenges and Opportunities. World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal (WCSIT). 2(1), 18"21.
Zajda, (2010). Global Pedagogies. Schooling for the Future, Dodrecht: Springer.
