Keywords
Civics, Civic Education, Political Education, Law Education, Governance, Social, Humaniora
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui problematika yang dialami guru dan upaya yang dapat dilakukan untuk mengatasi hambatan dalam penerapan pendekatan saintifik pada pembelajaran PPKn. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Keabsahan data dalam penelitian ini ditetapkan melalui teknik triangulasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa problematika guru dalam penerapan pendekatan saintifik, antara lain: (1) keterbatasan kompetensi guru; (2) ketimpangan sarana dan prasarana; (3) keterbatasan waktu dan biaya; (4) minimnya kreativitas dan inovasi; (5) kurangnya antusiasme, motivasi, dan rasa ingin tahu peserta didik; (6) rendahnya kemampuan berpikir kritis, menyelesaikan masalah, dan mengambil keputusan; (7) kurangnya kemampuan komunikasi dan kolaborasi; (8) rendahnya minat baca; (9) kurangnya literasi informasi; (10) rendahnya literasi teknologi informasi dan komunikasi (TIK); (11) keterbatasan pelatihan dan sosialisasi mengenai perencanaan, proses, maupun evaluasi pembelajaran. Solusi yang dilakukan guru untuk mengatasi hambatan dalam penerapan pendekatan saintifik dalam pembelajaran, antara lain: (1) mengikuti seminar, pelatihan, dan kegiatan MGMP; (2) menjalin kerjasama dengan kepala sekolah, waka kurikulum, dan rekan sejawat; serta (3) membangun hubungan kemitraan antara guru dengan wali murid.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This study aimed to reveal the problems experienced by teachers and the efforts to overcome obstacles in implementing the scientific approach toward civics and citizenship education. This study used qualitative descriptive method. Data collected through interviews, observation, and documentation. The validity of the data in this study determined through triangulation techniques. The results of the study showed that the teachers' problems in applying the scientific approach included: (1) the limitations of the teachers' competency; (2) inequality of facilities and infrastructure; (3) time and cost limitations; (4) lack of creativity and innovation, (5) lack of enthusiasm, motivation and curiosity of the students; (6) lack of critical thinking, problem-solving, and decision-making skills; (7) lack of communication and collaboration skills; (8) low interest in reading; (9) lack of information literacy; (10) low information and communication technology literacy (ICT); (11) limited training and socialization regarding learning planning, process and evaluation. The solutions made by the teacher to overcome the obstacles in applying the scientific approach on learning included: (1) attending seminars, training programs, and MGMP activities; (2) collaborating with the principal, the vice-principal, and colleagues, (3) and fostering collaboration between teachers and parents.
First Page
165
Last Page
176
Page Range
165-176
Issue
2
Volume
16
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jc.v16i2.24603
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/civics/article/view/24603
Recommended Citation
Haq, M. N., & Murdiono, M. (2019). Problematika guru dalam penerapan pendekatan saintifik pada pembelajaran PPKn. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 16(2), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v16i2.24603
References
Baadte, C., & Schnotz, W. (2014). Feedback effects on performance, motivation and mood: Are they moderated by the learner's self concept. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(5), 570-591.
Balser, T. J., Grabau, A. A., Kniess, D., Page, L. A. (2018). Collaboration and communication. New directions for institutional research, 175, 65-79.
Basrowi & Suwandi. (2008). Memahami penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. J. (1988). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A phenomenological approach to the social sciences. Canada: A Wiley-Interscience Publication.
Broome, E. (1973). Educating for the future: 21st century teaching. North Carolina: Division for Exceptional Children Department of Public Instruction.
Burgers, C., Eden, A., Van Engelenburg, M. D., Buningh, S. (2015). How feedback boosts motivation and play in a brain training game. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 94-103.
Bushman, B. J., Moeller, S. J., & Crocker. J. (2010, October). Sweets, sex, or self-esteem? Comparing the value of self-esteem boosts with other pleasant rewards. Journal of Personality, 1-28.
Chen, Y. C., Hand, B., Norton-Meier, L. (2016). Teacher roles of questioning in early elementary science classrooms: A framework promoting student cognitive complexities in argumentation. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 373-405.
Clarkeburn, K., & Kettula, K. (2012). Fairness and using reflective journals in assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(4), 439-452.
Cogan, J. J., & Derricot, R. (1998). Citizenship for the 21st century. London: Kogan Page Limited.
Creswell, J.W. (2015). Penelitian kualitatif & desain riset: memilih di antara lima pendekatan. (3rd ed.) (A.L. Lazuardi Trans). CA: Sage.
Davoudi, M., & Sadeghi, N.A. (2015). A systematic review of research on questioning as a high-level cognitive strategy. English Languge Teaching, 8(10), 76-90.
Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In Bellanca, J., & Brandt, R. 21st century skills: Rethinking how students Learn (Eds). 51-76. Bloomington: Solution Tree.
Dzhamalova, B. B., Timonin, A. I., Kolesov, V. I., Pavlov, V. V., Evstegneeva, A. A. (2016). Consolidating orientation of pedagogic functions of university teachers in international students training. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(9), 3041-3051.
Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2016). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms. (10th Ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Emmer, E. T., & Evertson, C. M. (2013). Classroom management for middle and high school teachers. (9th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson.
Endersby, L., Phelps, K., Jenkins, J. (2017). The virtual table: A framework for online teamwork, collaboration, and communication. New Directions for Student Leadership, 153, 75-88.
Febriana, B. W., Arlianty, W. N., Diniaty, A., Fauziah, L. (2017). An analysis of curriculum implementation on high school in Yogyakarta. AIP Conference Proceeding: American Institute of Physics.
Fisher, A., Greiff, S., Funke, J. (2012). The process of solving complex problems. The Journal of Problem Solving, 4(1), 19-42.
Fisher, J. (2011). The four domain model: connecting spirituality, health, and well-being. Journal of Religions, 2, 17-28.
Garcia, J. A., & Lewis, T. E. (2014). Getting a grip on the classroom: From psychological to phenomenological curriculum development in teacher education programs. Journal of Curriculum Inquiry, 44(2), 141-168.
Goodlad, J. I. (1968). The future of learning and teaching. Washington: National Education Association.
Heffernan, A. (2018). Power and the 'autonomous' principal: Autonomy, teacher development, and school leaders' work. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 50(4), 379-396.
Johnson-Mardones, D. (2014). Toward a multidimensional concept of curriculum: Understating curriculum as phenomenon, field and design. European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1(2), 172-177.
Jonnaert, P., & Therriault, G. (2013). Curricula and curricular analysis: some pointers for a debate. Prospects, 43(4), 397-417.
Kelley-Mudie, S., & Phillips, J. (2016). To build a better question. Knowledge Quest, 44(5), 14-19.
Kemendikbud. (2013). Modul pelatihan kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan.
Kemendikbud. (2015). Materi pelatihan implementasi kurikulum jenjang sekolah dasar tahun 2015. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan.
Kemendikbud. (2016). Materi pelatihan guru mata pelajaran pendidikan pancasila dan kewarganegaraan SMP, kurikulum 2013. (edisi revisi). Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama.
Kemendikbud. (2017). Panduan penilaian oleh pendidik dan satuan pendidikan sekolah menengah pertama. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama.
Kisfalvi, V., & Olivier, D. (2015). Creating and maintaning a safe space in experiental learning. Journal of Management Education, 39(6). 713-740.
Lederman, N.G. (2006). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Ed.). Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implication for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 301-318). Chicago: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Leslie, I. (2014). Curious, the desire to know and why: your future depends on it. London: Quercus.
Morris, P., Lloyd, C. M., Millenky, M., Leacock, N., Raver, C. C., Bangser, M. (2013). Using classroom management to improve preschoolers' social and emotional skills: Final impact and implementation findings from the Foundations of Learning Demonstration in Newark and Chicago. New York: MDRC.
Moyer, J. E. (1970). Bases for world understanding and cooperation: suggestions for teaching the young child. Prepared for the World Conference on Education. Asilomar, California, San Fransisco: ASCD Commission on International Cooperation in Education.
Mulyasa. (2014). Pengembangan & implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Murawski, L.M. (2014). Critical thinking in the classroom and beyond. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 10(1). 25-30.
Musingafi, M. C. C., Mhute, I., Zebron, S., Kaseke, K. E. (2015). Planning to teach: Interrogating the link among the curricula, the syllabi, schemes and lesson plans in the teaching process. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(9). 54-59.
Muth'im, A. (2014) Understanding and responding to the change of curriculum in the context of indonesian education. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(11), 1094-1099.
Neeleman, A. (2018). The scope of school autonomy in practice: An empirically based classification of school interventions. Journal of Educational Change, 20(1). 31-55.
OECD. (2017). Education at a glance 2017: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pike, Graham C. (2000). Global Education. The SAGE Handbook of Education for Citizenship and Democracy, 36, 468-484.
Rahmawati, A., Tairas, M. M. W., Nawangsari, N. A. F. (2018). Children's school readiness: teachers' and parents' perceptions. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2(1). 9-20.
Robinson, Ken. (2001). Out of my mind: Learning to be creative. Chichester: Capstone Publishing Ltd.
Rumahlatu, D., Huliselan, E. K., Takaria, J. (2016). An analysis of the readiness and implementation of 2013 curriculum in the west part of seram district, maluku province, indonesia. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(12). 5662-5675.
Santrock, John W. (2016). Educational psychology: Theory and application to fitness and performance (6th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Schleicher, A. (Ed.). (2012). Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Schmidt, S. J. (2018). Creating a classroom culture built on community. Journal of Food Science Education, 17 (1), 2-4.
Shane, H. G., & Tabler, M. B. (1981). Educating for a new millenium: Visions of 132 scholars. Blomington: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sun, Z. (2012). An empirical study on new teacher-student relationship & questioning strategies in ESL classroom. English Language Teaching, 5 (7), 175-183.
Suyanto, S. (2017). A reflection on the implementation of a new curriculum in Indonesia: a crucial problem on school readiness. AIP Conference Proceedings. 1868, 100008.
Tobiason, G., Heritage, M., Chang, S., Jones, B., Herman, J. (2014). Developing and refining lessons: planning learning and formative assessment for math college and career ready standards. California: The Regent of the University of California.
Toharudin, U., & Kurniawan I. S. (2017). Values of local wisdom: A potential to develop an assessment and remedial. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 6(1). 71-78.
Wahyudin, A.Y. & Sukyadi D. (2015). A closer at the implementation of the curriculum 2013 in Indonesia: should the scientific approach be used in EFL classroom? Rangsit Journal of Education Studies. 2(2). 56-70.
Wang, X., & Zheng, H. (2016). Reasoning critical thinking: Is it born or made? Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 6(6). 1323-1331.
Wanless, S. B. (2016). The role of phychological safety in human development. Research in Human Development. 13(1). 6-14.
Williams, J. H. (2015). Education from the bottom up: UNICEF's education programme in Somalia. International Peacekeeping. 22(4). 419-434.
