•  
  •  
 

PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika

Keywords

developing, teaching kit, solid geometry, SAVI approach

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran bangun ruang SMP dengan menggunakan pendekatan SAVI yang layak yaitu valid, praktis, dan efektif. Jenis penelitian ini adalah pengembangan. Penelitian pengembangan ini menggunakan model 4-D yang dikembangkan oleh Thiagarajan, Semmel dan Semmel. Pengembangan perangkat terdiri dari tahap analisis awal-akhir, analisis siswa, analisis materi, analisis tugas, spesifikasi tujuan pembelajaran, pemilihan media, pemilihan format, desain produk, uji ahli, uji coba terbatas dan uji coba lapangan. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 52 orang yang terdiri dari dua kelas yang berasal dari siswa SMPN 5 Sumbawa Besar dan SMPN 2 Unter Iwes. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan terdiri dari lembar validasi, lembar observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran, lembar penilaian sisiwa, lembar penilain guru, dan tes prestasi belajar. Analisis data dilakukan secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perangkat pembelajaran berupa silabus, Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) dan Lembar Kegiatan Siswa (LKS) yang dikembangkan memenuhi kriteria valid, praktis dan efektif serta Tes Prestasi Belajar (TPB) yang valid dan reliabel.

Kata kunci: pengembangan, perangkat pembelajaran, bangun ruang, pendekatan SAVI

Developing the Solid Geometry Teaching Kit for Junior High School Using SAVI Approach (Somatic, Auditory, Visual, and Intellectual)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to produce the solid geometry teaching kit for junior high schools which use SAVI approach that is valid, practical, and effective. This was a developmental research using a 4-D model by Thiagarajan, Semmel and Semmel. The developmental process consisted of front-end analysis, learner analysis, task analysis, concept analysis, specifying instructional objectives, format selection, product design, expert validation, small try-out, and field try-out. There were 52 subjects from two junior high schools namely SMPN 5 Sumbawa Besar and SMPN 2 Unter Iwes. This research instruments consisted of validation sheets, learning observation sheets, students evaluation sheets, teachers evaluation sheets and test. The data were analyzed descriptively.This research results revealed that the syllabus, lesson plan, and student work sheet which were developed are valid, practical, and effective, and achievement test is valid and reliabel. Keywords: developing, teaching kit, solid geometry, SAVI approach

Page Range

175-185

Issue

2

Volume

9

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pg.v9i2.9078

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/9078

References

Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Inc.

Arends, R.I., & Kilcher, A., (2010). Teaching for student learning: Becoming an accomplished teacher. New York, NY: Routledge.

Awofala, A.O.A., Balogun, T. A., & Olagunju, M. (2011). Effects of three modes of personalisation on students' achievment in mathematical word problems in Negeria. Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning , 1-25.

Azwar, S. (2010). Tes prestasi: Fungsi dan pengembangan pengukuran prestasi belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Clausen, T. (2005). Teaching math to pupils with different learning styles. London: A SAGE Publications Company.

Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 22 tahun 2006, tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah.

Depdiknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 41, tahun 2007, tentang Standar Proses untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Deporter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2013). Quantum learning. (Terjemahan Alwiyah Abdurrahman). New York, NY: Dell Publishing. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 1992).

Iswadji, D. (2001). Geometri ruang. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Duru, A. (2010). The experimental teaching in some of topics geometri. Educational Research and Review. 5(10) , 584-592.

Ebel, R., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

French, D. (2004). Teaching and learning geometry: Issu methods in mathematical and education. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Ganiron, T. U. (2013). Aplication of accelerated in teaching environmental control system in qassim university. International Journal and learning. 2, 27-38.

Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). Visual, auditory, kinestetik learning styles and their impacts on english language teaching. Journal of Studies in Education , 104-109.

Kennedy, L. M., Tipps, S., & Johnson, A. (2008). Guiding children's learning of mathematics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.

Meier, D. (2000). The accelerated learning handbook. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. Dalam van den Akker, J., Branc, R.M., Design approaches and tools in education and traning. Dordrecht, London: ICO Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Rappaport, D. (1996). Understanding and teaching: Elementary school mathematics. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Rose, C., & Nicholl, M. J. (2012). Accererated learning for the 21 century. (Terjemahan Dedy Ahimsa). London: Judy Piatkus. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 1997)

Sobel, M. A. & Maletsky, E. M. (2004). Mengajar matematika (edisi ketiga). (Terjemahan Suyono). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 1999)

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A Sourcebook. Minneapolis, MN: Central for Innovation on Teaching the Handdicaped.

Waluyo, M. (2011). Penerapan pendekatan SAVI melalui strategi penemuan untuk memahamkan materi volume pada siswa kelas XI teknik gambar bangunan SMKN 3 Tanjung Selor. Tesis Magister, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Negeri Malang.

Download

Share

COinS