•  
  •  
 

PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika

Keywords

CTL approach, problem posing approach, achivement of SK/KD, and student's mathematics connection ability

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan CTL ditinjau dari keter-capaian SK/KD dan kemampuan koneksi matematik siswa, mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari ketercapaian SK/KD dan kemampuan koneksi matematik siswa, dan menentukan mana yang lebih efektif antara pendekatan CTL atau pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari ketercapaian SK/KD dan kemampuan koneksi matematik siswa. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design. Populasi penelitian mencakup seluruh siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 11 Yogyakarta. Kelas VIIA dan VIIB ditentukan sebagai sampel menggunakan random sampling technique.Untuk menguji keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan CTL dan problem posing digunakan analisis one sample t-test. Selanjutnya untuk mengetahui perbedaan keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan CTL dan problem posing, data dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji T2 Hotelling's, dan uji t untuk menentukan pendekatan yang lebih efektif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan CTL efektif ditinjau dari ketercapaian SK/KD dan kemampuan koneksi matematik siswa, pendekatan problem posing efektif ditinjau dari ketercapaian SK/KD dan kemampuan koneksi matematik siswa, dan pendekatan CTL lebih efektif daripada pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari ketercapaian SK/KD, dan kemampuan koneksi matematik siswa.

Kata Kunci: pendekatan CTL, pendekatan problem posing, ketercapaian SK/KD, dan kemampuan koneksi matematik siswa.

The Effectiveness of Mathematics Teaching Using the CTL and Problem Posing Approaches Viewed from the Achievement of SK/KD and Ability of Mathematics Connection

Abstract

The aims of this research are to describe the effectiveness of the CTL approach viewed from students' achievement in SK/KD and mathematics connection ability, describe the effectiveness of the problem posing approach viewed from students' achievement in SK/KD and mathematics connection ability, and determine which one is more effective between the CTL approach and the problem posing approach viewed from the students' achievement in SK/KD and mathematics connection ability. This research was a quasi-experiment with apretest-posttest non- equivalent group design. The research population covered the entire students' of class VII of SMP Negeri 11 Yogyakarta. Classes of VIIA and VIIB were established as the sample using the random sampling technique. To test the effectiveness of mathematics teaching using the CTL approach and the problem posing approach, the analysis of one sample t-test was used. Furthermore, to discover the difference between the effectiveness of mathematics teaching using the CTL approach and the problem posing approach, the data were analyzed using T2Hotelling'stest, and t test to determine which approach was more effective. The research result suggests that the CTL approach is effective viewed from the student's achievement in SK/KD and mathematics connection ability, the problem posing approach is effective viewed from the students' achievement in SK/KD and mathematics connection ability, and the CTL approach is more effective than the problem posing approach viewed from the students' achievement in SK/KD, and mathematics connection ability. Keywords: CTL approach, problem posing approach, achivement of SK/KD, and student's mathematics connection ability.

Page Range

79-89

Issue

1

Volume

9

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pg.v9i1.9070

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/9070

References

Deen., Shamsid. I., & Smith. B. P. (2006). Contextual teaching and learning practies in the family and consumer sciences curriculum. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education. 24, 1, 14-27.

Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pen-didikan Nasional nomor 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pen-didikan Nasional nomor 23 tahun 2006 tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Depdiknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pen-didikan Nasional nomor 41 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Proses. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Guvercin, S., Cilavdaroglu, A. K. & Savas, A. C. (2014). The effect of problem posing instruction on 9th grade students' mathematics academic achievement and retention. Anthropologist, 17, 1, 129-136.

Iffah, Siti. (2009). Keefektifan pendekatan pembelajaran kontekstual dalam mening-katkan pemahaman konsep matematika siswa SMP Negeri 2 Depok Sleman Yogyakarta. Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

Johnson, E. B. (2009). Contextual teaching and learning: what it is and why it's here to stay. (Terjemahan A. Chaedar Alwasilah). California: Corwin Press, Inc. (Buku asli diterbitan tahun 2002)

Lavy, I., & Shriki, A. (2007). Problem posing as a means for developing mathematical knowledge of prospective teachers. Proocedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 129-136.

Lesh. R., et al. (2010). Modeling students' mathematical modeling competencies. Realistic Mathematical Modelling and Problem Posing. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and standars for school mathematics. Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.

PISA. (2013). PISA 2012 results infocus: what 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Diambil pada tanggal 25 Desember 2013, dari http://www.oecd.org/A/

Ramdhani, S. (2012). Pembelajaran mate-matika dengan pendekatan problem posing untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan koneksi matematis siswa. Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Rauf, S. (2004). Pembelajaran kontekstual dalam upaya meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan kemampuan koneksi mate-matik siswa SLTP Negeri 1: Suatu studi eksperimen pada siswa kelas II. Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Septiati, E. (2012). Kefektifan pendekatan konstruktivisme terhadap kemampuan koneksi matematis mahasiswa pada mata kuliah analisis real I. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika di FMIPA UNY, Yogyakarta, 34, 319-324.

Steven, J. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.

Sulistyaningsih, D., Waluya, S.B., & Kartono. (2012). Model pembelajaran tipe CIRC dengan pendekatan konstruktivisme untuk meningkatkan koneksi matematik. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 121-127.

Susan, R. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning. ProQuest, 77, 1, 40-41.

Tatsuoka, M. M. (1971). Multivariate analysis: techniques for educational and psycho-logical research. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Theofilus Fautngilyanan. (2009). Perbandingan keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan kontekstual dan pembelajaran dengan penemuan terbim-bing di SMA Negeri 1 Tual Provinsi Maluku. Tesis magister, tidak diterbit-kan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

TIMSS. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

Walz, C., Lincoln, N.E. (2008). Exploring the connections between math journals and the competion of homework assignments. Journal writing in mathematics, 1-32

Umar, W. (2009). Penerapan pembelajaran matematika SMP dengan contextual teaching and learning (CTL). Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

Wilburne, J.M., & Napoli, M. (2008). Connecting mathematics and literature: an analysis of pre-servise elementary school teacher's changisng beliefs and knowledge. Journal issues in the undergraduate mathematics preparition of school teachers, 2, 1-10.

Yuniawatika. (2011). Penerapan pembelajaran matematika dengan strategi REACT untuk meningkatkan kemampuan koneksi dan representasi matematika siswa Sekolah Dasar [Versi electronik]. Edisi Khusus, 2, 107-120.

Share

COinS