PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika
Keywords
problem posing approach, problem solving approach, students' achievement and curiosity
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan: keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan Pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving ditinjau dari prestasi dan curiosity siswa terhadap matematika, dan membandingkan keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan Pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving ditinjau dari prestasi dan curiosity siswa terhadap matematika. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu yang menggunakan dua kelompok eksperimen. Populasi penelitian mencakup seluruh siswa kelas VIII MTS NW Gunung Rajak yang berjumlah 90 siswa dan terbagi dalam tiga kelas, sedangkan sampel penelitian terdiri atas dua kelas yang ditentukan secara acak. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan adalah instrumen tes prestasi yang terdiri atas soal pretest dan posttest serta angket curiosity. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving tidak efektif ditinjau dari prestasi dan curiosity siswa terhadap matematika, pendekatan problem solving tidak lebih efektif secara signifikan daripada pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari prestasi belajar siswa, dan pendekatan problem posing tidak lebih efektif secara signifikan daripada pendekatan problem solving ditinjau dari curiosity siswa.
Kata Kunci: pendekatan problem posing, pendekatan problem solving, prestasi dan curiosity siswa terhadap matematika.
Effectiveness of Mathematics Instruction through the Problem Posing Approach and Problem Solving Approach in Terms of the Achievement and Curiosity
Abstract
This study aims to describe: the effectiveness of mathematics instruction through the Problem posing approach and problem solving approach in terms of achievement and curiosity, and to compare the effectiveness of mathematics instruction through the problem posing approach and through problem solving approach in terms of achievement and curiosity. This research was a quasi-experimental study using two experimental groups. The population of this research was all grade VIII students of MTs NW Gunung Rajak, totaling 90 students in three classes, from which two classes were randomly selected as the research sample. The instruments used in the research were an achievement test which consisted of a pretest and posttest and a curiosity. The results of the research show that: the problem posing approach and the problem solving approach are not effective in terms of students' achievement and curiosity, the problem solving approach is not more effective than the problem posing approach in terms of students' achievement, and the problem posing approach is not more effective than the problem solving approach in terms of students' curiosity. Keywords: problem posing approach, problem solving approach, students' achievement and curiosity
Page Range
11-21
Issue
1
Volume
9
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/pg.v9i1.9058
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/9058
Recommended Citation
Husni, M. A. (2014). Keefektifan Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Problem posing dan Problem solving Ditinjau dari Prestasi dan Curiosity. PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v9i1.9058
References
Azwar, S. (1996). Tes prestasi (2th ed). Yogyakarata: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bonotto, C. (2010). Engaging students in mathematical modelling and problem posing activities. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application. 2010, Vol. 1, No. 3, 18-32
BSNP. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 41, Tahun 2007, tentang Standar Proses.
Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20, Tahun 2003, tentang Sistem Pendidian Nasional.
Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No. 22, Tahun 2006, tentang Standar Isi.
Kemdikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No. 68 Tahun 2013 tentang Kurikulum 2013.
Honig, A.S., et.al, (2006). How curiosity leads to learning. Scholastic Early Childhood. Today. 2006;21,2.pg. 19
Hudojo, H. (2003). Pengembangan kurikulum dan pembelajaran matematika. Malang: JICA
Jirout, J. & Klahr, D. (2012). Children's scientific curiosity: in search of an operational definition of an elusive concept. Developmental Review. Vol 32, Issue 2, June 2012, pages 125-160.
Khalid, M. (2007). Incorporating mathematical thinking in addition and substraction of fraction: real issues and challenges. www.crme.kku.ac.th/APEC/PDF%202007/Madihah%20Khalid.pdf
Lavy, I. & Shriki, A. (2007). Problem posing as a means for developing mathematical knowledge of prospective teachers. Makalah disajikan pada Proceedings of the 31th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, di Oranim Academic College of Education.
NCTM. (2000). Principle and standards for school mathematic. Virginia: NCTM.
Rowson, J. (2012). The power of curiosity. London: RSA Sosial Brain Centre.
Schunk, D.H. (2012). Teori-teori pembelajaran perspektif pendidikan. (Terjemahan Eva Hamdiah & Rahmat Fajar). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sparks, J.C. (2008). The Pythagorean theorem crown jewel of mathematics. Ohio: Sparrow-Hawke Reasures.
Zuss, M. (2008). The practice of theoretical curiosity. New York: Springer.