PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika
Keywords
development, learning kits, collaborative learning, geometry
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran geometri SMP dengan pembelajaran kolaboratif yang valid, praktis, dan efektif. Model pengembangan diadaptasi dari model pengembangan Dick & Carey. Tahap-tahap pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran meliputi analisis kebutuhan dan perumusan tujuan, rancangan/pengembangan produk, uji coba, revisi dan kajian produk akhir. Produk berupa perangkat pembelajaran yang meliputi silabus, rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran (RPP), lembar kegiatan siswa (LKS), dan tes hasil belajar (THB) telah memenuhi kriteria valid, praktis, dan efektif. Kevalidan produk ditunjukkan dari hasil validasi ahli yang menunjukkan produk telah memenuhi kriteria sangat valid. Kepraktisan produk terlihat dari hasil penilaian guru yang menunjukkan bahwa produk memenuhi kriteria sangat baik, penilaian siswa menunjukkan produk mencapai kriteria minimal baik, dan rata-rata keterlaksanaan pembelajaran telah memenuhi kriteria baik sebesar 89,4%. Kefektifan produk dilihat dari minimal 75% siswa telah mencapai nilai ketuntasan minimal 75 (82,4%), hasil angket komunikasi interpersonal siswa mencapai kriteria minimal baik (82,3%), dan hasil penilaian aktivitas kolaborasi mencapai kriteria minimal baik (76,5%).
Kata kunci: pengembangan, perangkat pembelajaran, pembelajaran kolaboratif, geometri.
Developing Geometry Learning Kits for Junior High Schools with Collaborative Learning Strategies
Abstract
This study aimed to develop geometry learning kits for junior high schools with collaborative learning which is valid, practical, and effective. The development model was adapted from Dick & Carey Model. The steps to get valid, practical and effective learning kits were need assessment and the formulation of purpose, product design, try-out, revision, and final product review. This study produces geometry learning kits consisting of the syllabus, lesson plan, worksheets, and learning outcome test. The result of this study shows that the products are valid, practical, and effective. The validity of the product can be seen from the result of expert's validation that the product is valid. The practicality of the product can be seen from: the teachers' assessment sheet which shows that the product is in a good category; students' assessment sheet which shows that the product is in a good category; and the teacher's observation sheet which shows that the average learning activity is in a good category. The effectiveness of the product can be seen from minimally 75% students attain KKM score of 75 (82.4%); the students' interpersonal communication questionnaire result is good and very good (82.3%); and the collaborative activity assesement result is good and very good (76.5 %). Keywords: development, learning kits, collaborative learning, geometry
Page Range
146-159
Issue
2
Volume
8
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/pg.v8i2.8942
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/8942
Recommended Citation
Marlina, M. (2013). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Geometri SMP dengan Strategi Pembelajaran Kolaboratif. PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v8i2.8942
References
Barkley, E. E., Cross, K.P., & Major, C.H. (2012). Collaborative learning techniques. (Terjemahan Narulita Yusron). Bandung: Nusa Media.
Depdiknas. (2007). Peraturan menteri pendidikan nasional RI Nomor 41 tahun 2007 tentang standar proses.
Dick, W., Carey, J., & Carey, J.O. (2001). The systematic design of instruction. Boston: Pearson.
González, G. (2009). Mathematical task and the collective memory: how do the teachers manages student's prior knowledge when teaching geometry with problems?. Diakses tanggal 11 Oktober 2012 dari www.proquest.com.
Good, T. L., Mulryan, C., & MacCaslin, L. (1992). Grouping for instruction in mathematics: a call for pragmatic research on small-group processes. Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Ilknur., & Kaya. (2011). Collaborative learning in teaching a second language trough the internet. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE 11(3) Article 3. Diakses tanggal 11 Juli 2012 dari http://eric.edu.gov.
Kennedy, M.L., Tipps, S., & Johnson A. (2008). Eleventh edition guiding childern's learning of mathematics. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
Lin, C.P., et.al. (2011). The impact of using synchronous collaborative virtual tagram in childern's geometric. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2). Diakses tanggal 11 Juli 2012 dari http://eric.edu.gov.
Mert, S., & Karaca, D. (2010). The attitude of the perspective mathematics teachers toward instructional technologies and material development course. TOJET: The Tutkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (9) 1. Diunduh tanggal 11 Oktober 2012 dari www.proquest.com.
Muijs, D. & Reynolds, D. (2011). Effective teaching evidence and practice. (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, inc.
Safaria, T. (2005). Interpersonal intelligence. Yogyakarta: Amara Book.
Sato, M. (2007). Tantangan yang harus dihadapi sekolah. Makalah dalam bacaan rujukan untuk lesson study-berdasarkan pengalaman Jepang dan IMSTEP. Jakarta: Sisttems.
Suwaji, U. T. (2009). Permasalahan pembelajaran geometri ruang SMP dan alternatif pemecahannya. Yogyakarta: PPPPTK.
Uno, H. B. (2008). Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Van De Walle, J (2008). Matematika sekolah dasar dan menengah Jilid 2. (Terjemahan Suyono). Jakarta: Erlangga.