•  
  •  
 

PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika

Keywords

Model berpikir induktif, Probing-prompting learning, Argumentasi, Subgrup, Inductive thinking model, Argumentation

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan peningkatan kemampuan argumentasi maha­siswa sesudah mengikuti perkuliahan yang menerapkan model berpikir induktif dengan metode probing-prompting learning pada materi subgrup. Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi eksperimen dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Sampel penelitian adalah 38 mahasiswa angkatan 2016/2017 Prodi Pendidikan Matematika UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. Instrumen yang digu­nakan adalah lembar tes kemampuan argumentasi. Kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa diiden­tifikasi berdasarkan komponen argumentasi McNeill dan Krajcik yang terdiri dari claim, evidence, reasoning, dan rebuttal. Peningkatan kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa dianalisis dengan statistik non parametrik menggunakan uji Wilcoxon Signed-Rank pada taraf signifikan 5% (α = 0,05). Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa setelah perlakuan lebih baik dibandingkan sebelum perlakuan dan terdapat perbedaan signi­fikan (Z = -7,397, p = 0,000) kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa sebelum dan setelah diterap­kan model berpikir induktif dengan metode probing-prompting learning pada materi subgrup. Dengan demikian, penerapan model berpikir induktif dengan metode probing-prompting learning pada materi subgrup efektif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumen­tasi maha­siswa.

Students' argumentation ability through inductive thinking model with the probing-prompting learning method

Abstract

This study aimed to describe an increase in students' argumentative abilities after attending lectures that apply inductive thinking models with probing-prompting learning methods in subgroup material. This type of research was quasi-experimental with a quantitative approach. The study sample was 38 students of Mathematics Education Department of State Islamic University Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia. The instrument used was the argumentation ability test sheet. The student's argumentation ability was identified based on McNeill and Krajcik's argumentation component consisting of claims, evidence, reasoning, and rebuttal. Improved student argumentation skills were analyzed by non-parametric statistics using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. The results of data analysis showed that the students' argumen­tation ability after treatment was better than before treatment and there was a significant difference (Z = -7,397, p = 0,000) the ability of students' argumentation before and after the inductive thinking model with the probing-prompting learning method was applied in the subgroup material. Thus, the implementation of inductive thinking models with probing-prompting learning methods in subgroup material was effective for improving students' argu­men­tation abilities.

Page Range

23 - 32

Issue

1

Volume

14

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pg.v14i1.24038

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/24038

References

Bell, F. H. (1981). Teaching and learning mathematics in secondary schools. Debuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Company Publisher.

Chin, E. T. (2003). Mathematical proof as formal process in advanced mathematical thinking. Retrieved from http://www.lettredelapreuve.org/OldPreuve/PME/PME27/RR_chin.pdf

Danaryanti, A., & Tanaffasa, D. (2016). Penerapan Model Probing Prompting Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa SMP. EDU-MAT Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 8-14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v4i1.2283

Ennis, R. (1981). Critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Farida, I., & Gusniarti, W. F. (2014). Profil keterampilan argumentasi siswa pada konsep koloid yang dikembangkan melalui pembelajaran inkuiri argumentatif. EDUSAINS, 6(1), 31-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v6i1.1098

Gumelar, F. (2016). Efektivitas metode probing prompting learning dalam pembelajaran menulis argumentasi. Riksa Bahasa: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pembelajarannya, 2(2), 168-173. Retrieved from http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/RBSPs/article/view/9557

Huang, R. (2005). Verification or proof: Justification of pythagoras' theorem in chinese mathematics classroom. In Chick, H. L. & Vincent, J. L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 161-168). Melbourne: PME. Retrieved from https://www.emis.de/proceedings/PME29/PME29RRPapers/PME29Vol3Huang.pdf

Huda, M. (2017). Model-model pengajaran dan pembelajaran: Isu-isu metodis dan paradigmatis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Inglis, M., Ramos, J. M., & Simpson, A. (2007). Modelling mathematical argumentation: The importance of qualification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 3-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9059-8

McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Suporting grade 5-8 students in constructing explanation in science. London, UK: Pearson.

Meghan, B., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. (2015). The learning benefits of being willing and able to engage in scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590-1612. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045958

Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290570

Ruggiero, V. R. (2009). Becoming a critical thinker. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Shirley, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2), 235-260. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336957

Siakad UIN Sunan Ampel. (2017). Retrieved from http://siakad.uinsby.ac.id/akademik/siakad/index.php? page=list_nilai

Soedjadi, R. (1998). Kiat pendidikan matematika di indonesia: konstatansi keadaan masa kini menuju harapan masa depan. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.

Soekisno, R. A. (2015). Pembelajaran berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi matematis mahasiswa. Infinity Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 4(2), 120-139. doi: https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v4i2.p120-139

Stein, N., & Bernas, R. (1999). The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and skill. Amsterdam, Netherland: Amsterdam University Press.

Sumaryati, E., & Sumarmo, U. (2013). Pendekatan induktif-deduktif disertai strategi think-pair-square-share untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman dan berpikir kritis serta disposisi matematis siswa SMA. Infinity Journal, 2(1), 26-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v2i1.p26-42

Tristanti, L. B., Sutawidjaja, A., As'ari, A. R., & Muksar, M. (2015). Modelling student mathematical argumentation with structural-intuitive and deductive warrant to solve mathematics problem. Procedings ICERD 2015 (pp.130-139). Surabaya: The State University of Surabaya.

Zeidler, D. L. (1997). The central role of fallacious thinking in science education. Science Education, 81(4), 483-496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199707)81:4<483::AID-SCE7>3.0.CO;2-8

Download

Share

COinS