•  
  •  
 

PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika

Keywords

kesiapan guru, pembelajaran matematika, Kurikulum 2013, teacher readiness, learning of mathematics, Curriculum 2013

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap kesiapan guru matematika SMP negeri di Kabupaten Cilacap dalam melaksanakan Kurikulum 2013, terdiri dari: pengetahuan guru tentang pembelajaran matematika Kurikulum 2013, upaya yang dilakukan guru untuk meningkatkan pemahaman terhadap pembelajaran matematika Kurikulum 2013, sikap guru terhadap pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013, perencanaan pelaksanaan pembelajaran matematika yang sesuai dengan Kurikulum 2013, dan ketersediaan sarana dan prasarana sekolah yang menunjang pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian survei yang menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan didukung pendekatan kualitatif. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 31 guru ditentukan dengan teknik stratified purposive sampling. Pengumpulan data dilaksanakan melalui angket, wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kesiapan guru matematika SMP negeri di Kabupaten Cilacap termasuk kriteria cukup. Kesimpulan tersebut didukung oleh komponen: pengetahuan guru tentang pembelajaran matematika Kurikulum 2013 yang termasuk kriteria cukup; upaya yang dilakukan guru untuk meningkatkan pemahaman terhadap pembelajaran matematika Kurikulum 2013 yang termasuk kriteria kurang; sikap guru terhadap pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 yang termasuk kriteria cukup; perencanaan pelaksanaan pembelajaran matematika yang sesuai dengan Kurikulum 2013 yang termasuk kriteria cukup; dan ketersediaan sarana dan prasarana sekolah yang menunjang pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 yang termasuk kriteria kurang.

The readiness of mathematics teachers of state junior high schools to implement curriculum 2103

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the readiness of mathematics teachers of state junior high schools (SJHS's) in Cilacap Regency in implementing Curriculum 2013, consisting of: teachers' knowledge of the teaching of mathematics in Curriculum 2013, the teachers' efforts to improve their understanding of the teaching of mathematics in Curriculum 2013, the teachers'attitudes towards the implementation of Curriculum 2013, the planning of the implementation of teaching mathematics in accordance with Curriculum 2013, and the availability of facilities that support the implementation of Curriculum 2013. This study was a survey that used the quantitative approach supported by the qualitative approach. A sample of this study was 31 teachers using the stratified purposive sampling technique. The data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, observation, and documentation. The data were analyzed using the quantitative and qualitative descriptive techniques. The results of the research show that the readiness of mathematics teachers of state junior high schools in Cilacap Regency is included in the sufficient criterion. These conclusions are supported by the following components: the teachers'knowledge of the teaching of mathematics in Curriculum 2013, which is in the sufficient criterion; the teachers'efforts to improve their understanding of teaching mathematics in Curriculum 2013, which is in the insufficient criterion; the teachers'attitudes towards the implementation of Curriculum 2013, which is in the sufficient criterion; the planning the implementation of teaching mathematics in accordance with Curriculum 2013 which is in the sufficient criterion, and the availability of facilities that support the implementation of Curriculum 2013, which is in of the insufficient criterion.

Page Range

43-51

Issue

1

Volume

13

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pg.v13i1.21214

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/21214

References

Allen, T. (2007). Methods for success as a middle school science teacher. Science Scope, 31(1), 18.

Anderson, L.W & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assesing:a revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc

Beyene, G&Tizazu,Y. (2010). Attitudes of teachers towards inclusive education in Ethiopia. Ethiopia Journal Education And Science,6(1). Diambil dari https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejesc/article/view/65383

Dilekli, Y., & Tezci, E. (2016). The relationship among teachers’ classroom practices for teaching thinking skills, teachers’ self-efficacy towards teaching thinking skills and teachers’ teaching styles. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.06.001

Fulton, J. P., & Sabatino, L. (2008). Using the scientific method to motivate biology students to study precalculus. Primus, 18(1), 5-21.Retrived fromhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10511970701745007

Gable, R.K, McCoach, D.B, &Madura, J.P.(2013). Instrumentdevelopment in the affective domain. New York, NY: Springer Science Business MediaHandal, B., & Herrington, A. (2003). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and curriculum reform. Mathematics education research journal, 15(1), 59-69. Diambil dari https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03217369

Hunt, D.P. (2003). Theconcept of knowledge and how to measure it. Journal of intelectuall capital, 4(1), 100-113. Diambil dari https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdf/10.1108/14691930310455414

Jusoh, R. (2012). Effects of teachers readiness in teaching and learning of entrepreneurship education in primary schools. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(1027), 1-5.Diambil dari https://platform.almanhal.com/GoogleScholar/Details/?ID=2-42736

Keyes, G. (2010). Teaching the scientific methods in the social science. The Journal of the Effective Teaching, 10(2),18-28. Diambil dari https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092185

Koo, A. C. (2008). Factors affecting teachers’ perceived readiness for online collaborative learning: acase study in Malaysia. Journal of educational technology & society, 11 (1), 266-278.Diambil dari https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.11.1.266.pdfMarsh, C. J. (2008). Key concept for understanding curriculum. Great Britain: Routledge.

Mendikbud RI. (2013). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan Republik Indonesia nomor 81A tahun 2013 tentang implementasi kurikulum. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Diambil dari https://goo.gl/2nSrNr

Nel, N., Müller, H., Hugo, A., Helldin, R., Bäckmann, Ö., Dwyer, H., & Skarlind, A. (2011). A comparative perspective on teacher attitude-constructs that impact on inclusive education in South Africa and Sweden. South African Journal of Education, 31(1). Diambil dari https://www.ajol.info/index.php/saje/article/view/63492

Parker, L. (2017). Religious environmental education? the new school curriculum in Indonesia. Environmental Education Research, 23(9), 1249–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1150425

Posch, P. (1996). Curriculum change and school sevelopment. Environmental Education Research, 2(3), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462960020307Pugach, M.C. (2006). Becauseteaching matters. USA: John Wiley &Sons, Inc

Purnomo, Y. W. (2017). The complex relationship between teachers’ mathematics-relatedbeliefs and their practices in mathematics class. New Educational Review, 47(1), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2017.47.1.16

Raved, L., & Assaraf, O. B. Z. (2011). Attitudes towards science learning among 10th‐grade students: A qualitative look. International Journal of Science Education, 33(9), 1219-1243. Diambil dari https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500693.2010.508503

Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang sistem pendidikan nasional. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.

Retnawati, H. (2015). Hambatan guru matematika sekolah menengah pertama dalam menerapkan kurikulum baru. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 34(3), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v3i3.7694

Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, K., Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problem of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215–230. Diambil dari http://oaji.net/articles/2017/457-1524597598.pdf

Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., & Nugraha, A. C. (2016). Vocational high school teachers’ difficulties in implementing the assessment in curriculum 2013 in Yogyakarta province of Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.914a

Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., Nugraha, A. C., Arlinwibowo, J., Sulistyaningsih, E., Djidu, H., ... Iryanti, H. D. (2017). Implementing the computer-based national examination in Indonesian schools: the challenges and strategies. Problem of Education in the 21st Century, 75(6), 612–633. Diambil dari http://oaji.net/articles/2017/457-1513710818.pdf

Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., Arlinwibowo, J., Wulandari, N. F., & Sulistyaningsih, E.(2017). Teachers’ difficulties in implementing thematic teaching and learning in elementary schools. The New Educational Review, 49(3), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2017.48.2.16

Ritzema,E. S., Deunk, M. I., Bosker, R. J., & van Kuijk, M. F. (2016). The relation between teacher-set performance goals and students’ mathematical achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 51, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.003

Rusindrayanti, R., & Santoso, R. H. (2015). Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik Mapel Matematika Kelas VII Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014 pada Kurikulum 2013 DIY. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 80–94. Diambil dari http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/9112/pdf

Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya (cetakan 5). Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.Soemanto, W. (2003). Psikologi pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta

Syukriya, H., Herpratiwi, H., & Yulianti, D. (2016). Evaluasi implementasi penilaian Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Pendidikan, 4(1). Diambil dari https://www.neliti.com/publications/193309/evaluasi-implementasi-penilaian-kurikulum-2013

Wati, S., & Jailani, J. (2016). Kesiapan guru matematika SMP di kabupaten Purworejo dalam implementasi kurikulum 2013. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i1.9675

Wibowo, R & Wutsqa, D. (2014). Evaluasi pelaksanaan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP) mata pelajaran matematika SMP di kota Yogyakarta.Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 58-68. Diambil dari https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/2664

Download

Share

COinS