•  
  •  
 

PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika

Keywords

cooperative learning tipe STAD, cooperative learning tipe jigsaw, prestasi belajar, motivasi belajar, dan akhlak mulia

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan cooperative learning tipe Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) dan cooperative learning tipe Jigsaw serta membandingkan keefektifan kedua pendekatan tersebut ditinjau dari prestasi, motivasi belajar, dan akhlak mulia siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi experiment dengan pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X MA Ali Maksum, sedangkan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X-E dan X-G. Untuk menguji keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan cooperative learning tipe STAD dan cooperative learning tipe Jigsaw ditinjau dari masing-masing variabel, data dianalisis menggunakan uji t-test one sample, sedangkan untuk membandingkan keefektifan pembelajaran menggunakan kedua pendekatan tersebut, data dianalisis secara multivariat dengan statistik uji two-group MANOVA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan cooperative learning tipe STAD dan tipe Jigsaw efektif digunakan dalam pembelajaran matematika dan tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan penggunaan kedua pendekatan tersebut dalam pembelajaran matematika ditinjau dari prestasi, motivasi belajar, dan akhlak mulia siswa.

Kata kunci: cooperative learning tipe STAD, cooperative learning tipe jigsaw, prestasi belajar, motivasi belajar, dan akhlak mulia

Learning Mathematics with Cooperative Learning Approach in Terms of Students' Achievement, Motivation, and Noble Character

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the effectiveness of mathematics learning using cooperative learning approach type Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) and cooperative learning type Jigsaw and to compare the effectiveness of both approaches in terms of students' achievement, learning motivation, and noble character. This study was a quasi experiment research with pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. The study population included all students of class X MA Ali Maksum and the sample was class X-E and X-G that were selected randomly. To determine the effectiveness of mathematics learning using cooperative learning approach type STAD and cooperative learning type Jigsaw in terms of each variables, the data were analyzed using one sample t-test. Then to compare the effectiveness of mathematics learning using both approaches, the data were analyzed using multivariate statistical with two-group MANOVA test. The results show that the mathematics learning with cooperative learning type STAD and jigsaw was effective and there is no difference in the effectiveness of mathematics learning using cooperative learning type STAD and jigsaw in terms of students' achievement, learning motivation, and noble character. Keywords: cooperative learning type STAD, cooperative learning type jigsaw, learning achievement, learning motivation, and noble character.

Page Range

45-58

Issue

1

Volume

11

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pg.v11i1.9676

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/9676

References

Al-Qasimi, M. J. (1998). Mau'idhatul mu'minin. Beirut: Darul Fikri.

Arends, R. I. (1997). Clasroom instruction and management. New York,: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Arends, R. I. (2008). Learning to teach. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Arends, R. I., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teacing for student learning: Becoming an accomplished teacher. New York: Routledge Published.

Begle, E. G. (1979). Critical variables in mathematics education. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Assosiation of American.

Borich, G. D. (2007). Efective teaching methods. (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merril Prentice-Hall.

Cohen, J. (2006). Social, emotional, ethnical and academic education: Creating climate for learning, participation in democracy and well being. Harvard Education Riview, 71(2), 201-237.

Depdiknas. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 19, Tahun 2005, tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Ebel, R. I, & Frisbie, D. A. (1986). Essential of educational mesurement (4th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hell, Inc.

Fahrurrozi, F., & Mahmudi, A. (2014). Pengaruh PBM dalam setting pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan GI terhadap prestasi belajar dan kecerdasan emosional siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 1-11. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i1.2653

Huitt, G. W. (2001). Educational psychology interactive: Motivation to learn. Diakses pada 10 Oktober 2012 dari http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/-topics/motivation/motivate.html

Harian Kompas. (2011). Prevalensi penyalahgunaan narkoba di Indonesia.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Meaningful assessment: A manageable and cooperative proses. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Lickona, T. (1991). Educting for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York, NY: Bantam Books.

Mendiknas. (2007) Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 41 Tahun 2007, tentang Standar Proses.

Moore, L. L., Grabsch, D. K., Rotter, C. (2010). Using achievement motivation theory to explain student participation in a residential leadership learning commu-nity. Journal of Leadership Education, 9(1), 22-34.

Musfiroh, T. (2008). Cerdas melalui bermain. Jakarta: PT Grasindo

Musfiroh, T. (2008). Pengembangan karakter anak melalui pendidikan karakter. Dalam buku Tinjauan Berbagai Aspek Character Building, Penyunting Aris-mantoro. Yogyakarta: Lemlit UNY dan Penerbit Tiara Wacana.

Persky, A. M. & Pollack, G. M. (2009). Instructional design and assessment: a hybrid jigsaw approach to teaching renal clearance concepts. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73 (3), 1-12.

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2003). Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 20, Tahun 2003, tentang Sistem Pendidikan Indonesia.

Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Organizational behaviour. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Educational.

Romberg, T.A., & Shafer, M.C. (2008). The impact of reform instruction on student mathematics achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.

Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi proses standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prima

Santrock, J. W. (2008). Psikologi pendidikan. (Terjemahan Tri Wibowo). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Buku asli terbit tahun 2008.

Sardiman, A. M. (2001). Interaksi dan motivasi belajar mengajar pedoman bagi guru dan calon guru. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Schunk, D. H, Pintrich, P. R & Meece, J. L. (2010). Motivation in education theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Educational.

Slavin, R. E. .(2008). Cooperative learning: Teori, riset, dan praktik. (Terjemahan Zubaedi). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Buku asli terbit tahun 2005.

Slavin, R. E. (2005). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Slavin, R.E. (1994). Educational psychology theory: Theory and practice (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Suratno, S. (2014). Keefektifan pembelajaran tipe TPS dan JIGSAW ditinjau dari prestasi belajar matematika dan karakter siswa. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 70-78. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v9i1.9069

Tercanlioglu, L. (2004). Achievement goal theory: A perspective on foreign-language-learners' motivation. Tesl Canada Journal, 2(2), 34-49.

Wahyuni, A., & Abadi, A. (2014). Perbandingan keefektifan pembelajaran cooperative learning type STAD dan type TPS pada pembelajaran bangun ruang siswa SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 164-175. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2673

Winkel, W. S. (1996). Psikologi pengajaran. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Woolfolk, A. (2004). Educational psychology (10th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.

Ilyas, Y. (2006). Kuliah akhlak. Yogyakarta: LPPI UMY

Yunus, A. S., & Wan, A. W. Z. (2009). Motivation in the learning of mathematics. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 93-101.

Zuriah, N. (2007). Pendidikan moral dan budi pekerti dalam persfektif perubahan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Download

Share

COinS