PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika
Keywords
contextual teaching and learning, open ended, hasil belajar kognitif, hasil belajar sikap, hasil belajar keterampilan
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menemukan (1) pengaruh pembelajaran pada bangun ruang sisi lengkung dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) dan Open Ended terhadap hasil belajar kognitif siswa, (2) pengaruh pembelajaran pada bangun ruang sisi lengkung dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif CTL dan Open Ended terhadap sikap siswa, dan (3) pengaruh pembelajaran pada bangun ruang sisi lengkung dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif CTL dan Open Ended terhadap keterampilan matematika siswa. Jenis penelitian adalah eksperimen semu. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh siswa kelas IX SMP Muhammadiyah 8 Yogyakarta tahun pelajaran 2014/2015, sedangkan sampel penelitian adalah siswa kelas IX D dipilih secara acak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh pembelajaran bangun ruang sisi lengkung dengan strategi kooperatif CTL dan Open Endedterhadap hasil belajar kognitif, sikap, dan keterampilan siswa.
Kata Kunci: contextual teaching and learning, open ended, hasil belajar kognitif, hasil belajar sikap, hasil belajar keterampilan
The Influence of the Space Curved Side Up Learning Through CTL and Open Ended toward the Learning Result of Cognitive, Attitude, and Skill
Abstract
The aims of this research was to investigate: (1) the influence of the space curved side up learning with CTL cooperative learning strategy and Open Ended toward the students learning result of cognitive, (2) the influence of the space curved side up learning with CTL cooperative learning strategy and Open Ended toward the students learning result of attitude, and (3) the influence of the space curved side up learning with CTL cooperative learning strategy and Open Ended toward the students learning result of mathematical skills. This research was quasi experiment. The population of research was all students grade IX SMP Muhammadiyah 8 Yogyakarta, while the sample of research was students in class IX D selected randomly. The results show that the space curved side up learning with the of contextual teaching learning and open ended has influence toward the students learning result of cognitive, attitude, and skills. Keywords: contextual teaching and learning, open ended, the learning result of cognitive, the learning result of attitude, the learning result of skills.
Page Range
102-110
Issue
1
Volume
11
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/pg.v11i1.9677
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/9677
Recommended Citation
Yamti, Y. (2016). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Bangun Ruang Sisi Lengkung Melalui CTL dan Open Ended terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif, Sikap, dan Keterampilan. PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i1.9677
References
Alwasilah, C. (2011). CTL Contextual teaching and learning. Bandung: Kaifa Learning.
Ambrose et.al. (2010). How learning works. 7 research-based principles for smart teaching. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Aras, I., Ardiny, V., Djafar, S.. (2013). Pendekatan open-ended dalam pembelajaran matematika. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Arend, R. I., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning: Becoming an accomplished teacher. New York, NY: Routledge.
Becker, J. P., & Shimada, S. (1997). The openended approach: A new proposal for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Hamalik, O. (2008). Kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching learning: Why it is and why it is here to stay. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication Ltd.
Kusaeri & Suprananto. (2012). Pengukuran dan penilaian pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Kwon, O. N, Park, J. S & Park, J. H. (2006). Cultivating divergent thingking in mathematics through an open-ended approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), 51-61.
Majid, A. (2014). Pembelajaran tematik terpadu. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standard for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Nitko, A. J. & Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Educational assesment of students. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2003). Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 20, Tahun 2003, tentang Sistem Pendidikan Indonesia.
Putri, R., & Abadi, A. (2014). Keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan CTL dan problem posing ditinjau dari ketercapaian SK/KD dan kemampuan koneksi matematik. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 79-89. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v9i1.9070
Rahmawati ES, Y., & Harta, I. (2014). Keefektifan pendekatan open-ended dan CTL ditinjau dari hasil belajar kognitif dan afektif. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 113-126. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i1.2669
Rohayati, A. (2010). Pengembangan bahan ajar dengan pendekatan open ended untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis, kreatif, dan reflektif siswa SMA. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Rusman. (2014). Model-model pembelajaran: Mengembangkan profesional guru. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Widoyoko, E. P. (2014). Penilaian hasil pembelajaran di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Zan, R. & Martino, P. D. (2007). Attitude Toward Matematics: Overcoming The Positive/ Negative Dichotomy. TTME Monograph3, pp.157-168.