Keefektifan Model PBL dan PjBL Ditinjau dari Prestasi, Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, dan Motivasi Belajar Matematika Siswa SMP

Authors

Esti Rahayu, SMP Negeri 3 Pengadegan Desa Pasunggingan, Kabupaten Purbalingga, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Hartono Hartono, Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Jalan Colombo No. 1, Karangmalang, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia

Keywords

model PBL setting GI, model PjBL setting GI, prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan motivasi belajar

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan membandingkan keefektifan antara model PBL setting GI dan PjBL setting GI ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan motivasi belajar matematika siswa SMP. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMPN 3 Pengadegan Kabupaten Purbalingga, sedangkan sampel yang diperoleh melalui pemilihan secara acak yaitu siswa kelas VIII C dan VIII B. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes prestasi belajar, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan angket motivasi belajar matematika. Data dianalisis secara univariat dengan statistik uji one sample t-test untuk mengetahui keefektifan model pembelajaran, sedangkan data dianalisis secara multivariat dengan statistik uji two group MANOVA untuk membandingkan keefektifan model pembelajaran. Setiap analisis menggunakan taraf signifikansi 5%. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa model PBL setting GI dan PjBL setting GI efektif dan tidak ada perbedaan keefektifan antara kedua model pembelajaran ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan motivasi belajar matematika.

Kata Kunci: model PBL setting GI, model PjBL setting GI, prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan motivasi belajar.

The Effectiveness of PBL and PjBL Models in Term of Achievement, Critical Thinking Skills, and Motivation in Mathematics Learning of SMP Students

Abstract

This study aimed to describe and to compare the effectiveness of PBL model in the setting of GI and PjBL model in the setting of GI in term of learning achievement, critical thinking skills, and motivation in mathematics learning of SMP students. This study was a quasi-experimental research employing the pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. The research population comprised all students in grade VIII of SMPN 3 Pengadegan Purbalingga. The Samples were students of class VIII C and D were selected randomly from the population.. The data collecting instruments were a test of learning achievement, a test of critical thinking skills, and a questionnaire of motivation in mathematics learning. The data were analyzed using the univariatetechnique with the one sample t-test to determine the effectiveness of learning models, while to compare the effectiveness of learning models, the data were analyzed using the multivariate technique with the two groups MANOVA. Each analysis was done at the significance level of 5%. The results of the study show that the PBL and PjBL models in the setting of GI is effective and there is no difference the effectiveness of the two models in term of learning achievement, critical thinking skills, and motivation in mathematics learning. Keywords: PBL model in the setting of GI, PjBL model in the setting of GI, learning achievement, critical thinking skills, and learning motivation.

Page Range

1-10

Issue

1

Volume

11

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pg.v11i1.9629

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/9629

Recommended Citation

Rahayu, E., & Hartono, H. (2016). Keefektifan Model PBL dan PjBL Ditinjau dari Prestasi, Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, dan Motivasi Belajar Matematika Siswa SMP. PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i1.9629

References

Aiedah, A.K, & Audrey, L. K. C. (2012). Application of project-based learning in student's engagement in malaysian studies and english language. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research In Education, 2 (1), 37-46.

Arends, R. I., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning: becoming an accomplished taecher. New York, NY: Routledge.

Azwar, S. (2014). Tes prestasi: fungsi dan pengembangan pengukuran prestasi belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.

Baki, A., et.al. (2010). The application of group investigation technique: the views of the teacher and students. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 166-186.

Barrett, T. (2005). Understanding problem-based learning. Diakses tanggal 16 Agustus 2014 dari http://www.aishe.org

Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). Stem project-based learning. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers

Chang, C. S., Wong, W. T., & Chang, C. Y. (2011). Integration of project based learning strategy with mobile learning: case study of mangrove wetland ecology exploration project. Tamkang Journal of Science and Engineering, 14 (3), 265 - 273.

Ebel, R. I. & Frisbie, D. A.(1991). Essential of educational measurement. (5th ed). New Delhi, India: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Eggen, P & Kauchak, D. (2012). Strategi dan model pembelajaran: mengajarkan konten dan keterampilan berpikir. (Terjemahan Satrio Wahono). Boston, MA: Pearson Education. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 2012).

Fahrurrozi, F., & Mahmudi, A. (2014). Pengaruh PBM dalam setting pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan GI terhadap prestasi belajar dan kecerdasan emosional siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 1-11. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i1.2653

Farhan, M., & Retnawati, H. (2014). Keefektifan PBL dan IBL ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan representasi matematis, dan motivasi belajar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 227-240. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2678

Filippatou, D., & Kaldi, S. (2010). The effectiveness of project-based learning on pupils with learning difficulties regarding academic performance, group work and motivation. International Journal of Special Education, 25 (1), 17-26.

French, D. (2004). Teaching and learning geometry: issues and methods in mathematical education. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Imawan, O. (2015). Perbandingan antara keefektifan model guided discovery learning dan project-based learning pada matakuliah geometri. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 179-188. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v10i2.9156

Jhonson, R.A., & Wichern, D.W. (2007). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Kagan, S., & Kagan, M. (2009). Kagan cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publishing.

Kurniawan, D., & Wustqa, D. (2014). Pengaruh perhatian orangtua, motivasi belajar, dan lingkungan sosial terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 176-187. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2674

Quigley, D. (2010). Project-based learning and student achievement. Disertasi. Walden University, United States.

Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1 (1), 9-20.

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: theory, research, and practice. (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Sholikhah. (2014). Perbandingan keefektifan problem-based learning (PBL) setting model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe numbered head together (NHT) dengan tipe jigsaw pada materi geometri ditinjau dari prestasi belajar matematika, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan disposisi matematis siswa kelas X SMA. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta

Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistic for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group