•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika

Keywords

HOTS, junior high school mathematics, teachers competence

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This study is a survey research with a cross sectional survey design, which aims to describe the ability of junior high school mathematics teachers in writing HOTS items. The population of this study was junior high school mathematics teachers in Sleman Regency, while the sample was 21 teachers determined by non-stratified random sampling. The sample teachers came from 11 schools totaling 21 teachers. Each teacher created three HOTS items along with their grids. The question items made by the sample teachers were descriptive questions. The question items that had been prepared were then reviewed by two mathematics teachers from leading junior high schools in Yogyakarta. The next stage after validation is the trial. The number of respondents used was 263 students for testing teacher-made questions, namely 127 students in class VIII and 136 students in class VII. The results showed that the quality of the questions produced by the teacher based on the reliability estimation results obtained an estimate of 0.635 for class VII and 0.416 for class VIII. Likewise, the resulting differentiating power is less than 50% of the questions made by teachers who have differentiating power in the good, good, and very good categories. Factors that cause this include the lack of experience of teachers in writing HOTS questions. This is a special note to familiarize teachers with using HOTS questions in daily tests, UTS, and UAS proportionally so that the experience and ability of teachers to write HOTS questions increases.

Page Range

115-123

Issue

2

Volume

9

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jrpm.v9i2.55191

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/55191

References

Abosalem. (2016). Assessment Techniques and Students' Higher-Order Thinking Skills. International Journal of Secondary Education, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20160401.11

Alias, S.N. & Ibrahim F. (2015). The level of mastering forces in equilibrium topics by thinking skills. International Journal Of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 2(5), 18-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v2i5.27

Anggraini, N. P., Budiyono, & Pratiwi, H. (2019). Analysis Of Higher Order Thinking Skills Students at Junior High School in Surakarta. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 12(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1211/1/012077

Ariyadi Wijaya. (2012). Pendidikan matematika realistic: suatu alternatif pendekatan pembelajaran matematika. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Astuti, P. (2018). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 263-268. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/19599

Bayazit, I. (2013). An Investigation of Problem Solving Approaches, Strategies, and Models Used by the 7th and 8th Grade Students When Solving Real-World Problems. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 13 1-25.http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.3.1419

BSNP. (2006). Permendiknas RI No. 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta.

Iskandar, D. dan Senam, S. (2015) Studi Kemampuan Guru Kimia Sma Lulusan Uny Dalam Mengembangkan Soal Uas Berbasis HOTS, Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(1), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v1i1.4533

Mufidah, S., Wijaya, A., (2017), Pengembangan Kemampuan Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik, Seminar Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY 2017,675-680.

Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Educational measurement and evaluation. New York: MacGraw Hill Book Company.

Pramesti, S. L. (2017). Analisis Materi Dan Penyajian Buku Teks Matematika Sebagai Sumber Belajar Matematika. Delta: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 25-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.31941/delta.v5i1.386.

Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers' knowledge about higherorder thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.215.

Rohmawati (2013). Kurikulum 2013, 87 persen guru kesulitan dalam cara penilaian. www. unnes.ac.id Berita edisi sabtu, 14 desember 2013.

Saifuddin Azwar. (2013). Reliabilitas dan validitas (Edisi keempat). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Schulz, H., & FitzPatrick, B. (2016). Teachers' understandings of critical and higher order thinking and what this means for their teaching and assessments. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 62(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/10.11575/ajer.v62i1.56168

Setiawati, Wiwik., Asmira., A. (2019). Penilaian Berorientasi Hinger Order Thinking Skill. Direktorat Jendral Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Stiggins, R. And Chapuis, J. (2012). Introduction to student involved assessment for learning 2 nd edition. Boston: Addison Wesley.

Thomas, A., & Thorne, G. (2014). How to Increase Higher Order Thinking. http://www.readingrockets.org/article/34655

Undang-undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen

Wanty Widjaja. (2013). The use of contextual problems to support mathematical learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(2), 151-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.2.413.151-159

Download

Share

COinS