An analysis of mathematics understanding of prospective student-teachers of mathematics

Authors

Ali Mahmudi, Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Keywords

Mathematical representation, procedural instrumental understanding, prospective mathematics teacher, relational understanding

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This quantitative-qualitative descriptive study aims to reveal the mathematics understanding of prospective student-teachers, describe the types of their mistakes in mathematics understanding, and recommend appropriate teaching of mathematics understanding. The subjects were 34 first-year students taking the Geometry course in the Mathematics Education Study Program, at a State University in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The test instrument was consisting of four items, two of which were about the problems of procedural instrumental understanding and the other two were about the problems of relational understanding. The data were analyzed through the stages of reducing data, presenting data, and concluding data. The results show that students' mathematical understanding is categorized as good (87.75%). Students' procedural instrumental understanding (87.75%) is better than their relational understanding (77.52%) which is in good and sufficient categories, respectively. Some students made mistakes in representing theorems, performing mathematical procedural using appropriate concepts/theorems, and interpreting conclusions or proofs using appropriate notation and representation. It is recommended that mathematical learning should prioritize relational understanding by exploring a concept with other concepts and using various representations, situations, and contexts. Learning should focus more on relational understanding, namely discussing a concept and its relationship with other concepts with different representations, situations, and contexts.

Page Range

167-178

Issue

2

Volume

8

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jrpm.v8i2.44422

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/44422

Recommended Citation

Mahmudi, A. (2021). An analysis of mathematics understanding of prospective student-teachers of mathematics. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v8i2.44422

References

Ayvaz, Ãœ., Gündüz, N., & BozkuÅŸ, F. (2017). Understanding of prospective mathematics teachers of the concept of diagonal. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(2), 165-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.2.4102.165-184

Baktemur, G., Ayan Civak, R., & Isiksal Bostan, M. (2021). Pre-service middle school mathematics teachers' (mis)conceptions of definitions, classifications and inclusion relations of quadrilaterals. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(4), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11206

Bardini, C., Pierce, R., Vincent, J., & King, D. (2014). Undergraduate mathematics students' understanding of the concept function. IndoMS-JME, 5(2), 85-107. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.5.2.1495.85-107

Boaler, J., Chen, L., Williams, C., & Cordero, M. (2016). Seeing as understanding: the importance of visual mathematics for our brain and learning. Journal of Applied & Computational Mathematics. 5(5), 1-6. https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/seeing-as-understanding-the-importance-of-visual-mathematics-for-our-brain-and-learning-2168-9679-1000325.pdf

Borji, V., Font, V., Alamolhodaei, H., & Sánchez, A. (2018). Application of the complementarities of two theories, APOS and OSA, for the analysis of the university students' understanding on the graph of the function and its derivative. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2301-2315. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89514

Cramer, K., & Karnowski, L. (1995). The importance of informal language in representing mathematical ideas. Teaching Children Mathematics, 1(6), 332-335. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.1.6.0332

Depdiknas. (2007). Permendiknas nomor 16 tahun 2007 tentang standar kualifikasi dan kompetensi guru [Permendiknas number 16 of 2007 concerning teacher qualification and competency standards]. Jakarta, Indonesia: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional RI.

Donevska-Todorova, A. (2016). Procedural and conceptual understanding in undergraduate linear algebra. Proceedings of the First Conference of International Network for Didactic (pp 1-12). Montpellier (France): University Mathematics. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01337932/document

Engin, Ö., & Pusmaz, A. (2021). An analysis of high school students' understanding and reasoning of average concept. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 187-201. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.780680

Gokalpa, N. D., & Bulut, S. (2018). A new form of understanding maps: multiple representations with Pirie and Kieren Model of understanding. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 26(6), 1-21. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229408574.pdf

Hammad, S., Dimitriadis, C., & Graham, T. (2021). Using concepts maps in a foundation mathematics course: what have we learnt?. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9700

Li, H., & Yang, Z. (2019). Research on teaching strategies to realize mathematical understanding in university mathematics classes. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(4), 428-431. http://files.aiscience.org/journal/article/pdf/70320331.pdf

Hoosain, E. (2001). What does it mean to understand mathematics? Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal, 8(1), 19-22. https://doi.org/10.5642/hmnj.200101.25.09

Ibrahim, M. Y., Yusof, M. R., Yaakob, M. F. M., & Othman, Z. (2019). Communication skills: Top priority of teaching competency. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(8), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.8.2

Kemdikbud. (2016). Permendikbud nomor 24 tahun 2016 tentang standar kompetensi inti dan kompetensi dasar sekolah dasar dan menengah Kurikulum 2013 [Permendikbud number 24 of 2016 concerning core competency standards and basic competencies for elementary and secondary schools 2013 Curriculum]. Jakarta, Indoneisa: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.

Khan, A., Khan, S., Zia-Ul-Islam, S., & Khan, M. (2017). Communication skills of a teacher and its role in the development of the students' academic success. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 18-21. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1131770

Martín-Fernández, E., & Ruiz-Hidalgo, J. F. (2019). Meaning and understanding of school mathematical concepts by secondary students: the study of sine and cosine. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110490

NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

NCTM. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Patkin, D. & Plaksin, O. (2018) Procedural and relational understanding of pre-service mathematics teachers regarding spatial perception of angles in pyramids. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(1), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1480808

Poladian, L. & Zheng, C. (2016). Context, connections and communication: using journal articles in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 24(5), 14-23. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/CAL/article/view/10873

Sahin, Z., Yenmez, A. A. & Erbas, A. K. (2014). Relational understanding of the derivative concept through mathematical modeling: A case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1149a

Sierpinska, A. (2000). Mathematics classroom that promote understanding. https://www.emis.de/journals/ZDM/zdm002r2.pdf

Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77(1), 20-26. http://math.coe.uga.edu/olive/EMAT3500f08/instrumental-relational.pdf

Skemp, R. (1978). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 26(3), 9-15.

Utomo, D. P. (2020). The pattern of a relational understanding of fifth-grade students on integer operations. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 5(2), 119-129. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1267457.pdf.

Ãœnlüer, Ä ., & Kurtulus, A. (2021). The examination of conceptual and procedural understanding processes of eighth grade students in the subjects of identities and factoring. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 22-70. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.698535

Zhao, K., Zezhong, Y. & Sun, D. (2015). Research on mathematical understanding in Mainland China. International Conference on Management, Computer and Education Informatization (MCEI 2015). https://doi.org/10.2991/mcei-15.2015.39