Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika
Keywords
analisis kesalahan, ujian negara, operasi bilangan, error analysis, state examination, number operation
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan jenis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal operasi bilangan model Ujian Negara (UN) untuk tingkat SMP. Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian survei dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Survei dilaksanakan pada siswa SMP kelas IX se-Kabupaten Dharmasraya, Indonesia. Sampel penelitian sebanyak 104 siswa dipilih menggunakan teknik stratified propotional random sampling. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan tes diagnostik berupa soal uraian yang dimodifikasi dari soal pilihan ganda pada UN tingkat SMP. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa jenis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal operasi bilangan model UN untuk tingkat SMP yaitu kesalahan membaca (reading erorrs) sebanyak 30%; kesalahan pemahaman (comprehension errors) sebanyak 40%; kesalahan transformasi (transformations errors) sebanyak 83%; kesalahan keterampilan proses (processing skill errors) sebanyak 85%; dan kesalahan menarik kesimpulan (encoding errors) sebanyak 85%.
Abstract
This study aimed to describe the types of students' errors in solving the number operation problem of the state examination (Ujian Negara or UN) model for the junior high school level. This study was a survey with a quantitative approach. The survey was conducted on ninth-grade junior high school students in Dharmasraya Regency, Indonesia. The number of study samples was 104 students who were selected using the stratified proportional random sampling technique. The instrument used was a diagnostic test in the form of an essay problem which was modified from the multiple-choice national examination test at the junior high school level. The results showed that the types of students' errors in solving the UN model problem on the topic of number operations were: reading errors (30%); comprehension error (40%); transformations errors (83%); processing skill errors (85%); and encoding errors (85%).
Page Range
117 - 127
Issue
1
Volume
8
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jrpm.v8i1.16447
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/16447
Recommended Citation
Vionita, A., & Hartono, H. (2021). Kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal operasi bilangan model ujian negara tingkat SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v8i1.16447
References
Azis, A., & Sugiman, S. (2015). Analisis kesulitan kognitif dan masalah afektif siswa SMA dalam belajar matematika menghadapi ujian nasional. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 162-174. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i2.7331
Barbu, C. O., & Beal, C. R. (2010). Effects of linguistic complexity and math difficulty on word problem solving by english learners. International Journal of Education, 2(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v2i2.508
Blanco, L., & Garrote, M. (2007). Difficulties in learning inequalities in student of first year of pre-university education in Spain. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(3), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75401
BSNP. (2013). Panduan pemanfaatan hasil UN tahun pelajaran 2012/2013 untuk perbaikan mutu pendidikan. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Kemendikbud.
BSNP. (2014). Panduan pemanfaatan hasil UN tahun pelajaran 2013/2014 untuk perbaikan mutu pendidikan. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Kemendikbud.
BSNP. (2015). Panduan pemanfaatan hasil UN tahun pelajaran 2014/2015 untuk perbaikan mutu pendidikan. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Kemendikbud.
BSNP. (2016). Panduan pemanfaatan hasil UN tahun pelajaran 2015/2016 untuk perbaikan mutu pendidikan. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Kemendikbud.
Cooney, T. J., Davis, E. J., & Henderson, K. B. (1975). Dinamics of teaching secondary school mathematics. Houghton Mifflin Company.
Isgiyanto, A. (2011). Analisis untuk menemukan informasi diagnostik data ujian nasional matematika sekolah menengah pertama [Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta]. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/42262/
Jha, S. K. (2012). Mathematics performance of primary school students in Assam (India): An analysis using Newman procedure. International Journal of Computer Applications in Engineering Sciences, 2(1), 17-21.
Kemendikbud. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 59 Tahun 2014 tentang Kurikulum 2013 SMA/MA. https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/arsip/Permendikbud%20Nomor%2059%20Tahun%202014.pdf
Kemendikbud. (2016a). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. http://bsnp-indonesia.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/Permendikbud_Tahun2016_Nomor020_Lampiran.pdf
Kemendikbud. (2016b). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. http://bsnp-indonesia.org/wpcontent/uploads/2009/09/Permendikbud_Tahun2016_ Nomor023.pdf
Leighton, J. P., & Gierl, M. J. (2007). Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education. Cambridge University Press.
Prakitipong, N., & Nakamura, S. (2006). Analysis of mathematics performance of grade five students in Thailand using Newman procedure. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 9(1), 111-122. http://doi.org/10.15027/34243
Rumasoreng, M. I., & Sugiman, S. (2014). Analisis kesulitan matematika siswa SMA/MA dalam menyelesaikan soal setara UN di Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 22-34. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i1.2661
Singh, P., Rahman, A. A., & Hoon, T. S. (2010). The Newman procedure for analyzing primary four pupils errors on written mathematical task: A Malaysian perspective. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.036
Smith, C. W., Elkins, J., & Gunn, S. (2011). Multiple perspectives on difficulties in learning literacy and numeracy. Springer.
Suwarto, S. (2013). Pengembangan tes diagnostik dalam pembelajaran. Pustaka Belajar.
Suyitno, A. (2015). Learning therapy for students in mathematics communication correctly based-on application of Newman procedure (a case of Indonesia student). International Journal of Education and Research, 3(1), 529-538. https://ijern.com/journal/2015/January-2015/44.pdf
White, A. L. (2005). Active mathematics in classrooms finding out why children make mistakes and then doing something to help them. Journal of The Primary Association for Mathematics, 15(4), 15-19.
Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: an analysis of students' errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555-584.
Wurinanda, I. (2016, June 10). Matematika paling sulit di UN SMP 2016. http://news.okezone.com