Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika
Keywords
keefektifan, pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah, ketercapaian standar kompetensi, motivasi belajar, minat belajar, bangun ruang sisi datar
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah dan keefektifan pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah dibandingkan dengan pembelajaran langsung pada pembelajaran bangun ruang sisi datar ditinjau dari ketercapaian standar kompetensi, motivasi, dan minat belajar di SMP.Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi experiment dengan pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa SMP Negeri 4 Kertosono, kabupaten Nganjuk dan diambil secara acak dua kelas sebagai sampel yaitu kelas VIII-E dan VIII-H. Untuk menguji keefektifan pembelajaran, dianalisis menggunakan uji one sample t-test. Untuk menguji bahwa pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah lebih efektif dari pada pembelajaran langsung, dianalisis menggunakan MANOVA yang dilanjutkan dengan uji t-Benferroni dan untuk mendeskripsikan peningkatan dianalisis menggunakan uji score gain ternormalisasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah efektif dan pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah lebih efektif daripada pembelajaran langsung, serta rata-rata skor gain ternormalisasi pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah lebih tinggi daripada pembelajaran langsung ditinjau dari penguasaan standar kompetensi, motivasi, dan minat belajar siswa SMP.
Kata Kunci: keefektifan, pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah, ketercapaian standar kompetensi, motivasi belajar, minat belajar, bangun ruang sisi datar
The Effectiveness of the Problem-Based Learning on Plane Solid Figure in Terms of Mastery of Competency Standard, Learning Motivation and Learning Interest of Junior High School Students
Abstract
This study aims to describe the effectiveness of the problem-based learning approach and problem-based learning approach compared with direct instruction approach in a plane solid figure in terms of achievement of competency standard, learning motivation and learning interest of junior high school students. This study was a quasi-experimental study employing the pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group design. The research population comprised years VIII students in SMP Negeri 4 Kertosono, Nganjuk Regency and two classes, class VIII-E and VIII-H were randomly selected as the research sample. To test the effectiveness of the problem-based learning approach, the one sample t-test were used. Then, to test the more effectiveness of the problem-based learning approach than the direct instruction approach, the MANOVA was carried out and then continued by the t-Bonferroni test, and to describe increase the data were analyzed using the normalized gain score. The result of the study show that the problem-based learning approach effective and the problem-based learning approach is more effective than the direct instruction approach, and the means normalized score gain the problem-based learning approach is more than direct instruction approach in term of achievement of competency standard, learning motivation, and learning interest of elementary Scholl students.
Keywords: effectiveness, problem-based learning, achievement of competency standard, motivation learning, learning interest, plane solid figure
Page Range
56-66
Issue
1
Volume
4
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jrpm.v4i1.12722
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/12722
Recommended Citation
Astutik, H. S. (2017). Keefektifan pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah pada bangun ruang sisi datar ditinjau dari penguasaan SK, motivasi, dan minat siswa SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i1.12722
References
Aiken, L. R. (1999). Personality assessment: Methods and practices. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th Editio). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Arends, R. I., & Kilcher, A. R. (2010). Teaching for student learning: Becoming an accomplished teacher. Routledge. New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203866771
Arends, R. I., Prajitno, H., & Mulyantini, S. (2008). Belajar untuk mengajar (Learning to teach), 1 Edisi 9 (7 edition). Yogyakarta: Salemba Humanika .
Bell, F. H. (1981). Teaching and learning mathematics (in secondary schools). Des Moines: W.C. Brown Co.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. New York: McGrawHill. Retrieved from https://www.umweltbildung-noe.at/upload/files/OEKOLOG 2014/2_49657968-Teaching-for-Quality-Learning-at-University.pdf
Borich, G. D. (2007). Effective teaching methods : research-based practice. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Publication.
Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2005). Psychological testing and assesment: an introduction to tests and measurement 6th ed. New York: Tata McGraw Hill.
Delisle, R. (1997). How to use problem-based learning in the classroom. Alexandria: Assosiation for supervision and curiculum development. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/197166.aspx
Dell'Olio, J. M., & Donk, T. (2007). Models of teaching : connecting student learning with standards. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Elliott, S. N. (2000). Educational psychology: Effective teaching, effective learning. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Gable, R. K. (1986). Instrument development in the affective domain. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7259-0
Hook, P., & Vass, A. (2000). Creating winning classrooms. London: D. Fulton.
Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Joyce, B. R., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2014). Models of teaching. London: Pearson Education Inc.
Killen, R. (2007). Effective teaching strategies: Lessons from research and practice. Victoria: Thomson Social Science Press.
Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitrs Cendikia Offset.
Mawardi, D. N. (2011). Komparasi keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendidikan matematika realistik indonesia dan problem based learning pada hasil belajar, motivasi belajar, dan sikap siswa SD. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Retrieved from http://eprints.uny.ac.id/48144/
Maxwell, N. L., Mergendoller, J. R., & Bellisimo, Y. (2005). Problem-based learning and high school macroeconomics: A comparative study of instructional methods. The Journal of Economic Education, 36(4), 315-329. http://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.36.4.315-331
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible hidden variable'' in diagnostic pretest scores. Am. J. Phys, 70(12), 1259-1268. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215Í”
Middleton, J. A., & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65. http://doi.org/10.2307/749630
Muhson, A. (2010). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 8(2), 1-10.
Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2005). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice. London: SAGE Publications.
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of students. New Jersey: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Ormrod, J. E. (2003). Educational psychology: Developing learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Pretice Hall.
Presiden Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang sistem pendidikan nasional, Pub. L. No. 20 (2003). Retrieved from http://sindikker.dikti.go.id/dok/UU/UU20-2003-Sisdiknas.pdf
Rencher, A. C. (1998). Multivariate statistical inference and applications. New York: Wiley.
Santrock, J. W., & Wibowo B.S., T. (2008). Psikologi pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana. http://doi.org/2008
Savickas, M., & Spokane, A. R. (1999). Vocational interests: Meaning, measurement, and counseling use. Palo Alto: Davies-Black Pub.
Sax, G. (1997). Principles of educational and psychological measurement and evaluation. California: Wadsworth.
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. New Jersey: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
Seifert, K., & Sutton, R. (2009). Educational psychology. Orange Grove.
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Pearson College Div.
Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York: Routledge.
Tan, O. S. (2003). Problem-based learning innovation : using problems to power learning in the 21st century. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia.
Uno, H. B. (2007). Teori motivasi dan pengukurannya: Analisis di bidang pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Wijayanti, D. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran statistika dan peluang dengan metode penemuan terbimbing berorientasi kurikulum 2013 untuk siswa kelas X. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 23. http://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i1.6449
Williams, K. C., & Williams, C. C. (2011). Five key ingredients for improving student motivation. Research in Higher Education Journal, 11, 1-23. Retrieved from http://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/math_fac_scholar
Winkel, W. S. (2004). Psikologi pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Media Abadi. http://doi.org/2004
Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.