•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika

Keywords

pembelajaran berbasis masalah, problem posing, kemampuan berpikir logis, kemampuan berpikir kritis

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan keefektifan pembelajaran matematika berbasis masalah, problem posing, dan pendekatan konvensional serta perbandingan keefektifannya ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir logis dan kritis. Jenis penelitian adalah quasi experiment dengan pretest-posttest with nonequivalent group design. Populasi penelitian adalah 240 siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 2 Ciamis. Tiga kelas diambil secara acak untuk sampel penelitian, kemudian ditentukan lagi secara acak kelas eksperimen pertama, kelas eksperimen kedua, dan kelas kontrol. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes kemampuan berpikir logis dan tes kemampuan berpikir kritis yang terdiri atas soal pretest dan posttest. Teknik analisis data meliputi t-one sample test untuk menguji keefektifan masing-masing pendekatan pembelajaran dan MANOVA untuk menguji perbedaannya yang dilanjutkan dengan uji univariat. Semua uji menggunakan taraf signifikansi 5%. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) pembelajaran berbasis masalah dan problem posing keduanya efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis tetapi tidak efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir logis sedangkan pembelajaran konvensional tidak efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir logis maupun kemampuan berpikir kritis; (2) ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir logis, tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan antara pembelajaran berbasis masalah dan problem posing tetapi keduanya lebih unggul dibandingkan pembelajaran konvensional sedangkan jika ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, pembelajaran berbasis masalah lebih unggul dibandingkan pembelajaran problem posing dan pembelajaran konvensional serta pembelajaran problem posing lebih unggul dibandingkan pembelajaran konvensional.

Kata Kunci: pembelajaran berbasis masalah, problem posing, kemampuan berpikir logis, kemampuan berpikir kritis

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING AND PROBLEM POSING IN TERM OF THE LOGICAL AND CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY

Abstract

This study aims to describe the effectiveness of mathematics instruction through the problem-based learning, problem posing, and conventional learning approach with their effectiveness compa-ration in terms of logical and critical thinking ability. This research was a quasi-experimental study using the pretest-posttest with nonequivalent group design. The population of this research was all 240 students of grade VIII SMPN 2 Ciamis. Three classes were randomly established as the research sample, later established randomly the first experimental class, second experimental class, and control class. The instruments used in the research were a logical thinking ability test and critical thinking ability test, consisting of a pretest and posttest. The data analysis techniques consisted of the t-one sample test to investigate the effectiveness of each learning approaches and MANOVA to investigate their difference and continue by univariate test. All of tests use the 5% of significance level. The results of the research show that: (1) both of the problem-based learning and problem posing are effective in terms of critical thinking but they are not effective in terms of logical thinking and the conventional approach is not effective in terms of both the logical and critical thinking; (2) in terms of logical thinking, there are not signifficant difference between problem-based learning and problem posing approaches but they are better than conventional approach and in terms of critical thinking, problem-based learning is better than both of problem posing and conventional approaches and problem posing is better than the conventional approach. Keywords: problem-based learning, problem posing, logical thinking ability, critical thinking ability

Page Range

107 - 120

Issue

1

Volume

2

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jrpm.v2i1.7154

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/7154

References

Abu, R., & El Sayed, E. (2000). Effectiveness of problem posing strategies on perspective mathematics teachers' problem solving performance. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in S.E. Asia, Vol. XXV, No.1, 56-69.

Albrecht, K. (1992). Brain power: learn to improve your thinking skills. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Artzt, A.F. & Femia, S.Y. (1999). Dalam Stiff, Lee V. & Curcio, Frances R. (Eds). Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K-12 (pp. 115). Reston, VA: NCTM.

Ary, D., et al. (2010). Introductions to research in education, (8th ed). Belmont: Wadsworth

Baden, M.S. & Major, C.H. (2004). Foundations of problem-based learning. Open University Press.

Barwise, J. & Etchemendy, J. (1999). Language, proof and logic. New York: Seven Bridges Press.

Bonotto, C. (2010). Engaging students in mathematical modelling and problem posing activities. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application. Vol. 1, No. 3, 18-32

Brown, S.I. & Walter, M.I. (2005). The art of problem posing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Chaffee, John. (2012). Thinking critically (10th ed). Boston: Wadsworth.

Delisle, R. (1997). How to use problem-based learning in the classroom. Virginia: ASCD.

Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No. 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi.

Epstein, R.L. (2006). Critical thinking. Toronto: Thomson Wadsworth.

Ennis, R. H., (1985). Goals for a critical thinking curriculum. Dalam Costa, A. L. (Ed), Developing minds: a resource book for teaching thinking (pp. 54-57). Alexandria: ASCD.

Hunter, D.A. (2009). A practical guide to critical thinking, deciding what to do and believe. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Judge, B., Jones, P. & McCreery. (2009). Critical thinking skills for education students. Exeter: Learning Matters Ltd.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J. & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: helping children learn mathematics. Washington DC: National Academy Press

Kneedler, Peter. (1985). Dalam Costa, A. L. (Ed), Developing minds: a resource book for teaching thinking (pp. 54-57). Alexandria: ASCD

Krulik, S., & Rudnick. J. A. (1999). Innovative Task to Improve Critical and Creative Thinking Skill. Dalam Stiff, Lee V. & Curcio, Frances R.(Eds). Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K-12 (pp. 138). Reston: NCTM.

Matlin, M.W. (2009). Cognition (7th ed). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Moore, B.N & Parker, R. (2000). Critical thinking (9th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Mora, M.A. et al. (2002). Mathematics problem-based learning through spreadsheet-like documents. Diambil pada tanggal 15 Maret 2014, dari http://www.math. uoc.gr/~ictm2/Proceedings/pap170.pdf

Mukhayat, T. (2004). Mengembangkan metode belajar yang baik pada anak. Yogyakarta: FMIPA UGM.

Mullis, I. V. S., et al. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international result in mathematics. Chestnut hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of student (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do - student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I, revised edition, February 2014). Diambil pada 30 Desember 2013, dari http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/ 9789264208780-en.

Pittalis, M. (2004). A structural model for problem posing. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol 4 pp 49-56.

Pressesisen, B. Z. (1985). Thinking skill: meanings and models. Dalam Costa, A. L. (Ed), Developing minds: a resource book for teaching thinking (pp. 43-48). Alexandria: ASCD

Roh, Kyeong Ha. (2003). Problem-based Learning in Mathematics. U.S. Department of Education: Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC).

Ruggiero, V.R. (2009). Becoming a critical thinker, a master student text. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Diambil pada tanggal 2 Juli 2013 dari http://www.fizkarlsruhe.de/fiz/publication/zdm/2dm97343.pdf

Tan, Oon-Seng (2003). Problem-based learning innovation: using problem to powers learning in the 21st century. Singapura: Cengage.

Tan, Oon-Seng (2004). Enhancing thinking throught problem-based learning approach; international perspectives. Singapura: Thomson.

Tatsuoka, M. M. (1971). Multivariate analysis: techniques for educational and psychological research. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Xia, X., Lu, C., & Wang, B.B. (2008). Research on mathematics instruction experiment based problem posing. Journal of mathematics education. Vol.1, no.1, p.153-163.

Download

Share

COinS