Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Profile of Mathematics Prospective Teachers in the Micro Teaching Course from the Perspective of Teaching Style

Authors

Nenden Suciyati Sartika, Mathla'ul Anwar University, Indonesia

Keywords

TPACK Profile, Prospective Teachers, Teaching Styles

Document Type

Article

Abstract

The objective of this research is to ascertain the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) profile of prospective mathematics teachers in the microteaching course, as well as to explore the interrelation between teaching styles and TPACK. The research methodology employed in this study adopts a quantitative approach, specifically utilizing a survey research design. The target population for this investigation comprises prospective mathematics teacher students enrolled at Mathla'ul Anwar University in Banten, Indonesia. The sample for this study comprises students in their sixth semester of the Mathematics Education program who are currently enrolled in the microteaching course. The inclusion criteria for the sample require that these students have successfully completed coursework in foundational technology use, pedagogical principles, and both basic and advanced mathematics subjects. The research findings indicate that the majority of students exhibit a high level of Technological Content Knowledge (TCK) and Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK), with percentages of 50% and 81.25% respectively. On the other hand, the majority of students demonstrate a moderate level of Pedagogical Knowledge (PK) and Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK), with percentages of 56.25% and 31.25% respectively. Moreover, a significant portion of students show a low level of Technological Knowledge (TK) at 31.25%, Content Knowledge (CK) at 37.5%, and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) at 37.5%. The teaching style of prospective mathematics teachers tends to lean towards technological teaching and personalized teaching styles, wherein students utilize technology in the learning process and adapt teaching materials to match the readiness level of the students.

Issue

2

Volume

10

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jrpm.v10i2.64215

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/64215

Recommended Citation

Sartika, N. S. (2023). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Profile of Mathematics Prospective Teachers in the Micro Teaching Course from the Perspective of Teaching Style. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v10i2.64215

References

Alqurashi, E., Gokbel, E. N., & Carbonara, D. (2017). Teachers' Knowledge in Content, Pedagogy and Technology Integration: A Comparative Analysis Between Teachers in Saudi Arabia and United States. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12514

Ball, A., Joyce, H. D., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2016). Exploring 21st Century Skills and Learning Environments for Middle School Youth. International Journal of School Social Work, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.4148/2161-4148.1012

Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (2013). Cognitive Activation in The Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers: Results from the COACTIV Project. In Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers: Results from the COACTIV Project. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research Methods in Education. In Research Methods in Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Lestari, S. (2018). Peran Teknologi dalam Pendidikan di Era Globalisasi. EDURELIGIA; JURNAL PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33650/edureligia.v2i2.459.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054

Nevrita, N., Asikin, N., & Amelia, T. (2020). Analisis Kompetensi TPACK pada Media Pembelajaran Guru Biologi SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i2.16709

Nuangchalerm, P. (2020). Tpack in Asean Perspectives: Case Study on Thai Pre-Service Teacher. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20700

Nurhalimah, N., Baisa, H., & Asmahasanah, S. (2020). Pengaruh Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa di MI I'anatusshibyan. JPG: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.32832/jpg.v1i1.2865

Rafi, I., & Sabrina, N. (2019). Pengintegrasian TPACK dalam Pembelajaran Transformasi Geometri SMA untuk Mengembangkan Profesionalitas Guru Matematika. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v3i1.1430

Safari, M., Jaenudin, R., & Koryati, D. D. (2014). Analisa Gaya Mengajar Guru Ekonomi di SMA Negeri Se-Kecamatan Lahat. Journal Profit, 1(2).

Surani, D. (2019). Studi literatur: Peran Teknologi Pendidikan dalam Pendidikan 4.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP, 2(1).

Swallow, M. J. C., & Olofson, M. W. (2017). Contextual Understandings in the TPACK Framework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3-4). https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1347537.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.