•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan

Keywords

intercultural sensitivity, multicultural

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Di dalam masyarakat majemuk atau multikultural seperti Indonesia ini, sensitivitas antarbudaya yang dimiliki warga masyarakat menjadi elemen penting untuk terciptanya kehidupan bermasyarakat, berbangsa dan bernegara yang damai. Namun demikian, penelitian yang memfokuskan pada sensitivitas antarbudaya belum banyak dilakukan. Oleh karena itu, peneliti tertarik untuk meneliti masalah sensitivitas antarbudaya, khususnya di kalangan mahasiswa. Secara khusus, penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk membandingkan tingkat sensitivitas antarbudaya mahasiswa di tiga program studi yang ada di UNY, UPNV, dan UNRIYO. Penelitian yang menghasilkan luaran berupa tulisan ini merupakan penelitian komparatif, berusaha membandingkan tingkat sensitivitas antarbudaya mahasiswa tiga program studi (Keperawatan, PKn, dan Teknik Perminyakan). Responden penelitian ini sebanyak 90 mahasiswa yang dipilih secara acak dari tiga program studi tersebut (Keperawatan: 30; PKn: 30; dan Teknik Perminyakan: 30). Metode pengumpulan data adalah dengan penyebaran angket. Data dianalisis secara statistik baik secara deskriptif maupun komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan tingkat sensitivitas antarbudaya di antara tiga program studi tersebut. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa mahasiswa dari ketiga program studi tersebut memiliki tingkat sensitivitas antarbudaya yang tinggi, karena berada pada kategori pendukung cultural relativism, bukan cultural egocentrism.

ABSTRACT

In a pluralistic or multicultural society like Indonesia, intercultural sensitivity possessed by citizens is an important element for the creation of a peaceful society, nation, and state. However, there has not been much research focusing on intercultural sensitivity. Therefore, researchers are interested in examining the issue of intercultural sensitivity, especially among students. Specifically, this research was intended to compare the level of intercultural sensitivity among students in the three study programs at UNY, UPNV, and UNRIYO. The research report written in this paper is a comparative study, trying to compare the level of sensitivity among students of three study programs (Nursing, Civics, and Petroleum Engineering). The research respondents were 90 students who were randomly selected from the three study programs (Nursing: 30; Civics: 30; and Petroleum Engineering: 30). The method of collecting data is by distributing questionnaires. Data were analyzed statistically both descriptively and comparatively. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the level of intercultural sensitivity among the three study programs. Thus, it can be concluded that students from the three study programs have a high level of intercultural sensitivity, because it is in the category of supporting cultural relativism, not cultural egocentrism.

First Page

195

Last Page

202

Page Range

195-202

Issue

2

Volume

17

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jc.v17i2.35314

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/civics/article/view/35314

References

Bank, J.A. and Bank, C.A.M. (2016). Multicultural Education, issues and perspectives, Ninth Edition. Danvers: Wiley.

Bank, J.A. (2008). Diversity, group identity, and citizenship education in a global age.

Educational Researcher, 37 (3); Education Database.

Benhabib, S. (2004). The rights of others: Aliens, residents, and citizens. Cambridge, UK:

Cambridge University Press.

Bennet, M.J. (1986). A development approach to training for intercultural sensitivity.

International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10 (2), 179-196.

Bennet, M.J. (1993). Toward Ethnorelativism: A Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity. In M.R. Paige (Ed.) Education for the Intercultural Experience (pp.21-71). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.

Castles, S., & Davidson, A., (2000). Citizenship and migration: Globalization and the politics of belonging. New York: Routledge.

Cheng, Y.C. (2005). New paradigm for re-engineering education, globalization, localization, and individualization.: Dordrecht: Springer.

Giddens, A. (1989). The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy.Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hammer, M.R., Bennet, M.J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 421-443.

Holm, K., Nokelainen, P., & Tirri, K. (2009). Intercultural and Religious Sensitivity of Finnish Lutheran 7th -9th Grade Student. In C. Bakker, H.G. Heimbrock, R. Jackson, G. Skeie, & W. Weisse (Eds.). Religious Diversity and Education-Nordic Perspectives (pp. 131-144). Munster: Waxmann.

Luchtenberg, S., (Ed.). (2004). Migration, education and change. London: Routledge.

Meyer, L.H., Park, H.S., Bevan-Brown, J.M., and Savage, C. (2016). "Culturally Responsive Special education in Inclusive School" in Bank and Bank (Eds.).Multicultural Education, issues and perspectives, Ninth edition. Danvers: Wiley.

Nash, R. (2005). A letter to secondary school teachers: teaching about religious pluralism in the public schools. In Noddings (Ed.). Educating citizens for global awareness (pp. 93-106). New York: Teachers College Press.

Noddings, N. (1993). Educating for intelligent belief or unbelief. New York: Teachers College Press.

Noddings, N. (2005). Educating citizens for global awareness. New York: Teachers College Press.

Osler, A. & Starkey, H. (2005). Changing citizenship. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.

Ricci, C., and Pritscher, C.P., (2015). Holistic pedagogy, the self and quality willed learning. London: Springer.

Tirri, K. & Nokelainen, P. (2011). Measuring multiple intelligences and moral sensitivities in education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Download

Share

COinS