Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education)
Keywords
kualitas sistem informasi, ISO 25010
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menjamin tingkat kualitas sistem informasi pantauan pembentukan karakter siswa agar tidak terjadi error serta menjamin fitur dan fugsionalitasnya dengan melakukan pengujian menggunakan standar ISO 25010. Pengujian dilakukan menggunakan 5 karakteristik pada standar ISO 25010 yaitu functional suitability, usability, reliability, performance efficiency, dan maintainability. Instrumen yang digunakan yaitu kuesioner fungsionalitas, USE Questionnaire, stress testing, load testing, dan maintainability index. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah sistem informasi telah memenuhi standar ISO 25010 pada karakteristik functional suitability dengan nilai 1 (baik), karakteristik usability sebesar 85,3% (sangat layak) dan nilai alpha cronbach sebesar 0,944 (excellent), karakteristik reliability sebesar 100% (lolos), karakteristik performance efficiency sebesar 2,5 detik (diterima), dan karakteristik maintainability sebesar 100 (sangat mudah dirawat).
First Page
102
Last Page
109
Page Range
102-109
Issue
1
Volume
2
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/elinvo.v2i1.16427
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/elinvo/article/view/16427
Recommended Citation
H. Setiawan, "ANALISIS KUALITAS SISTEM INFORMASI PANTAUAN PEMBENTUKAN KARAKTER SISWA DI SMK N 2 DEPOK SLEMAN,", vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 102 - 109, Dec 2017.
The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.21831/elinvo.v2i1.16427
References
Ancharya,A., & Sinha, D. 2013. Assessing the Quality of M-Learning System using ISO/IEC 25010. International Journal of Advanced Computer Research, 67-75
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1998. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Asthana, A., & Olivieri, J. 2009. Quantifying Software Reliability and Readliness. IEEE
Gilem, J., & Gilem, R. 2003. Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability, Coeficient for Liker-Type Scales. Midwest Research-to-Ptractice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education
Lund, A. 2001. Measuring Usability with the USE Questionnaire. Retrieved December 26, 2016, from http://stcig.org/usability/newsletter/0110_measuring_with_use.html
Miguel, J.,Mauricio, D., & Rodriguez, G. 2014. A Review of Software Quality Models for the Evaluation of Software Product. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, 31-53
Nielsen, J. 2010. Website Response Times. Retrieved December 28, 2016, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/website-response-times/
Nielsen, J. 2012. How Many Test users in a Usability Study? Retrieved December 28 2016, from https://www.nngroup/articles/how-many/test-users/
Pressman, R. 2012. Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, Seventh Edition. (A. Nugroho, G Nikijuluw, T. Rochadiani, & I. Wijaya, Trans.) Yogyakarta: Andi
Rosa A. S., & Shalahuddin, M. 2011. Modul Pembelajaran Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak (Terstruktur dan Berorientasi Objek). Bandung: Modula
Sommerville, I. 2003. Software engineering/ Sixth Edition. (Z. Hanun, Trans.)Jakarta: Erlangga.
Sudaryono.2015. Metode Riset di bidang TI(Panduan praktis, teori dan contoh kasus). Yogyakarta: Andi
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode penelitian pendidikan: pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif fan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Veenendal, E. 2014. The new standard for software product quality. Testing Experience.